The term "Abrahamic religions" is invalid

The term "Abrahamic religions" is invalid in itself, meaning it does not need to be explained to say whether it is true or false, but it is invalid in itself, used to mislead and remove the differences between the Tawheed (monotheism) for which the heavens and the earth were established, the scales were set, and Paradise was created, and on the other hand: shirk (polytheism) which the heavens almost split from, the earth cracks, and the mountains crumble! To put this and that in one pot!

There are no "religions" that are Abrahamic. Rather: (The religion with Allah is Islam). It is the religion of Ibrahim, Musa, Isa, and all the prophets, peace be upon them. And the "religions" other than Islam have been infiltrated by shirk (polytheism) and distortion after the prophets, peace be upon them.

So what about the differences? They are differences in some laws, not in the religion and beliefs. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said: (I am the closest of people to Isa ibn Maryam in this world and the Hereafter, and the prophets are brothers from different mothers, but their religion is one) (Al-Bukhari).

Look at those who try to put in one pot a religion about which Allah said: (And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted from him, and in the Hereafter he will be among the losers), with religions and sayings that Allah described by saying: (Indeed, they have disbelieved who say), and by saying: (That is their saying with their mouths, imitating the saying of those who disbelieved before them)!!

( Ibrahim was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a Hanif (upright) Muslim and not of the polytheists (67). Indeed, the closest of people to Ibrahim are those who followed him and this Prophet and those who believed. And Allah is the Protector of the believers (68)) (Al-Imran).