Darwin's Bullet Against Humanity - Part 2
What values are many Darwinist
atheists advocating nowadays?
Freedom
Equality
Human rights
Women's rights
Let's see the status of women
in the Darwinian "scientific" framework
Charles Darwin planted the seed for
the evolutionary
inferiority for women.
In his book,
"The Descent of Man",
In a section titled,
"Difference in the mental powers
of the two sexes" he described
some female characteristics as:
"characteristics of lower races"
Then came the well-known
French scientist
Gustave Le Bon.
In a "scientific" publication
in the science journal
"Revue d'Anthropologie",
Vol 2, No 2, 1879,
—What I will say is shocking
so I'll provide the reference
for you to see for yourself
This is a summary of the actual text
yet still very long
so I will tell you when it ends—
Gustave Le Bon says,
"In the most intelligent races
(e.g. Parisians) there is a considerable"
percentage of (women) whose brains
come nearer in volume to the
skulls of gorillas than to the skulls
of the most developed males.
This inferiority is so obvious that
no one can contest it
for a moment
All psychologists who have studied,
the intelligence of women
recognize today that they represent
the most inferior forms of human
evolution and are much nearer
to savages and children than to
the civilized adult male.
Without doubt there exist
some distinguished women,
very superior to the average man,
but they are as exceptional
as the birth of any monstrosity,
as, for example,
of a gorilla with two heads;
consequently,
we may neglect them entirely!"
This is the end of Le Bon's quote
I apologize to my female viewers
But I'm just the messenger!
Dr. Jerry Bergman wrote
several articles to highlight
the inferiority of women
concept in Darwinism
They are all summarized in the book,
"ُWomen: between Darwinism and Atheism"
I think it's clear now that
based on Darwinian evolution
—which atheists adopt— there is:
No equality,
no freedom,
no human rights,
and no women’s rights!
The values that they call to
are demolished by their Darwinism!
Now, dear viewers, let's engage in
discussion with the atheist
Some atheists will say,
"We do not agree with all
the practices that were committed
in the name of Darwinism and atheism
Rather, we believe in equality
among all mankind."
But then, the question to them becomes:
"Aren't you betraying
your Darwinism
in this case?
Aren't you deviating from
the "scientific" conclusions of
Darwinism (in your perspective)
by bowing to popular slogans such as
human rights and women's rights?
Based on your Darwinism
you must abide by your belief
in the "Survival of the fittest"
—nature's law—
which brought you to this life
You should not betray
blind "mother nature"
that brought you to existence
or put any obstacles in her path
to select the fittest
In Darwinism, there is no
justification for moral values
Rather, the Darwinian struggle requires
the races that consider
themselves superior
to be selfish,
greedy,
monopolizing,
to attack the inferior races,
exterminate them and reproduce
at their expense
You, atheist, have one of two options:
You either follow your aforementioned
predecessors and their criminal legacy
Sorry!
I mean "moral" legacy per your Darwinism
or you acknowledge the existence
of inherent moral
values and original equality among humans
and reject the previously-mentioned
Darwinian practices
But then, you would be
contradicting yourself;
as —in your materialist worldview—
there is no place for values
as discussed in the previous episode
and borrowing morals from outside
your materialistic viewpoint
is an implicit acceptance
of the failure of your
materialistic Darwinian viewpoint
and an admission of its
inadequacy for human needs
Thus, when you, the atheist,
adopt human values
in dealing with other races
without discrimination
and adopt the value of mercy
towards the weak;
you are committing
"immoral acts"
per your Darwinistic viewpoint
Because, as per the example
we gave earlier
you allowed lower species
in the evolutionary ladder
to reproduce at the expense
of higher species!
If we take care of monkeys at the expense
of humans, it would not be a moral act
Your Darwinism makes your mercy
towards other races,
the weak and the disabled "immoral"!
Listen to your scholars who
remained true to their Darwinism
and did not contradict themselves
According to Herbert Spencer,
the idea of providing
preventive healthcare,
state sponsorship of healthcare,
and vaccinating citizens
is contradictory to the basic
principles of natural selection;
as is supporting the weak
and trying to protect
the sick to ensure their survival!
These are your scholars who
remained true to their Darwinism
How would you reply to them?
On what basis
would you fault them?
What is your "scientific" justification
for adopting good morals?
Richard Weikart —in this regard—
says, "Darwinism —or at least some
naturalistic interpretation of Darwinism—
succeeded in turning morality on its head.
...neither Hitler nor his Nazi followers
would have had the necessary scientific
underpinnings to convince themselves
and their collaborators that
one of the world's greatest atrocities was
really morally praiseworthy."
If you, Darwinists, equate
the healthy and disabled;
the intelligent and foolish;
the male and female;
what is your rationale
for stopping at this point?
Why don't you carry on
and equate humans with
chimpanzees, gorillas, and
other species that are
evolutionary close to humans
according to your belief?
Especially since you don't believe
in any distinctive
spiritual value which
differentiates humans from animals
Francis Fukuyama, in
"The End of History", says,
—what can be summarized as—
If we truly believe that
the human is merely
an organism in an animal hierarchy
subject to the laws of nature
with no transcendent values;
then, it is inevitable that
all living organisms
have equal rights!
Consequently, we are not allowed
to defend egalitarian rights
There is either
a savage social segregation
or an impossible egalitarianism
Some people might say,
"There are atheists with good morals."
We reply, "It's not a question of
whether
an atheist can be moral or
a believer can be immoral
Rather, the rational question is:
Does atheism lead to good morals?"
Obviously, the good morals
that some atheists have
isn't because of atheism;
because the belief
that we're here in this life
without purpose,
without guardianship,
and without rewards or penalties
for our actions:
good or bad;
this belief
cannot be a motivation for good morals!
However, a person is affected by
multiple factors
such as upbringing and
the surrounding environment
and atheistic conviction isn't the only
factor shaping a person's morals
In contrast, true belief in the existence
of Allah —in the Islamic perspective—
propels the believer towards
the most noble morals
If a believer has bad morals
then it is due to
a deficiency in his belief;
and not because his belief
caused or
led to the bad morals
The atheist, however, is in harmony
with his atheistic principles
when he adopts the worst morals;
and schizophrenically contradicts
and betrays
his materialism
when he adopts good morals!
The atheist might say, "Modern science
helps us debunk errors in Darwin's theory
—which led to segregation and racism—
without tearing down the whole theory!"
Again, I reiterate, this is not the place
or time to refute Darwinism;
However, we will respond to this point
by highlighting that
Darwinism claims that all species
including humans are constantly evolving
This necessitates the existence of
a higher race and
a lower race within
the current human populations
This is indisputable among Darwinists
They might, however, debate the criterion
for this evolutionary differentiation
Is it according to the size of the skull?
the color of the eyes?
frontal bossing?
the size of the nose?
intelligence?
skills?
psychological makeup?
etc.
In principle, however,
according to Darwinism,
there must be lower and higher
races among humans;
leading inevitably to the hateful
discrimination that we saw
You can now understand
the blessing —in Islam— of stressing
the original equality among human beings
Allah says what can be translated as, "O
mankind, indeed We have created you from
male and female and made you peoples and
tribes that you may know one another.
Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight
of Allah is the most righteous of you.
Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted."
(Quran 49:13)
The most righteous of you!
In Islam, the sphere of competition is in
something people can strive to achieve:
Righteousness!
Not skin color,
size of lips,
or shape of nose!
Then, you will realize
the blessing of Islam
whose Prophet Muhammad,
Peace & Blessings be upon him said,
"No favor of an Arab over a foreigner,
nor a foreigner over an Arab,
nor white skin over black skin,
nor black skin over white except by
righteousness. Narrator: Ahmad
and, "Women are counterparts of men."
Narrator: Abu Dawood
Praise be to Allah, who guided us
to know that we do not exist on
this earth to fight for survival;
but to worship Allah Who decreed
—among of the most important
means for His worship—
kindness to people,
mercy towards the weak,
and altruistic acts!
Peace be upon you all