Gender (Social Gender): Its Reality and Beyond
The Tragedy of the "Reimer" Twins: The Story That Shook the World
Peace be upon you. What was the incident that happened to these innocent twins in 1967, which was exploited to promote the concept of "gender" and then impose it on the entire world and on our children and students in our schools? Why did Oprah Winfrey, host of the famous American program, say about the study conducted on these two children that it was promoted as a scientific victory, when in fact it was a failure that destroyed the lives of all those affected by it?
And how is this concept being used to destroy the lives of human communities around the world and in Muslim countries as well? And why were the international slogans changed from "Opposing Violence Against Women" to "Opposing Gender-Based Violence"? This is what we will learn about in this dangerous and shocking episode.
Medical Error and the Beginning of the Criminal Experiment
In 1965, Canadian Janet Reimer gave birth to two beautiful twins, Bruce and Brian. The children grew up normally until they began to have problems urinating, so the doctor told her that they were suffering from a condition called phimosis and needed a circumcision procedure.
During Bruce's operation, the doctor used a cauterizing tool that was heated more than necessary, causing a large part of his male organ to burn. The parents were severely depressed, and in their search for a solution, they watched a television interview with John Money, a psychologist from Harvard University who worked in what is called sexology.
John Money's Theory: Nurture vs. Nature
Money was delighted with Bruce's condition because he wanted to use it to prove his theory. He proposed to the parents that Bruce be turned into a female through the removal of the testicles and the later administration of female hormones. When the parents asked, "Won't Bruce feel like a male?", he replied with his famous theory: "Nurture is more important than nature."
Money claimed that gender identity is not something innate or biological, but rather a product of upbringing and the environment. He said, "If you treat Bruce as a female, he will grow up as a psychologically and emotionally balanced female." From here, Money began to separate the term "biological sex" from "gender/social gender," claiming that gender is a "social construct" and not a biological reality.
The Creation of "Brenda" and the Real Failure of the Experiment
Based on Money's recommendations, the parents changed Bruce's name to Brenda and began treating him as a girl. However, nature was stronger; from a young age, Brenda would tear the clothes of girls, refuse to play with dolls, and prefer rough play with boys and climbing trees.
Despite this obvious suffering, John Money falsified the facts and published a book in 1972 claiming that the experiment was a complete success and that Brenda was a happy and well-adjusted girl. This lie became the "scientific basis" on which the concept of gender was built globally, while the reality behind closed doors was tragic; Money was forcing the twins to engage in abnormal and disgusting sexual practices and training under the guise of "psychological treatment."
The Horrifying Truth and the Tragic End
When Bruce reached the age of thirteen, he threatened to commit suicide if he was forced to complete the female surgical procedures. Then his parents told him the truth. Bruce finally felt relief because he understood the reason for his inner conflict and decided to return to his male identity, underwent corrective surgeries, and named himself David Reimer.
David married and lived a life trying to forget the past, but the trauma was deeper than could be healed. In 2002, his brother Brian committed suicide with an overdose of drugs due to depression, and two years later, in 2004, David Reimer committed suicide with a gunshot to his head, ending the lives of the victims of this scientific lie.
Gender: From Personal Crime to International Ideology
The shocking thing is that despite the exposure of John Money's lies and the failure of his experiment, the extreme feminist lobby and international organizations had already adopted the term "gender." The term appeared in United Nations documents (Cairo 1994 and Beijing 1995) as a tool to combat what they call "stereotypical roles."
The goal of spreading this concept in Muslim countries is to strike the concept of "fitrah" (innate nature) and eliminate the legal differences between men and women, leading to the elimination of the concept of "Qawamah" (male guardianship) and the authority, and the legitimization of deviance and gender transition under the name of "gender identity."
Simone de Beauvoir: The Other Face of Gender
John Money was not alone in this battle against fitrah, but the extreme feminist movements relied on the ideas of Simone de Beauvoir, who launched her famous saying: "One is not born, but rather becomes a woman." She believed that a person's identity is a product of "conditioning" imposed by the environment and culture, not the creation of God Almighty, who said: "And the male is not like the female."
Looking at de Beauvoir's biography, we find her to be a person immersed in deviance and sexual assault on her students, to the point of being dismissed from teaching in France. Nevertheless, she is presented today as an icon of human rights in United Nations documents, and her ideas, which aim to equate men and women in everything and eliminate the innate roles that God has created people with, are celebrated.
The War on Fitrah and Qawamah
The conclusion of Money's and de Beauvoir's theory is what is being asked of our children today in schools to raise in signs to obtain international grants: "Gender does not mean sex." Through this separation, the legal rulings are being undermined; if the male is not distinguished by anything in his original creation and fitrah from the female, then why does he have Qawamah? And why are inheritances or family roles different?
This war stems from a materialistic atheistic vision that denies the existence of a divine design for man and considers our bodies to be mere "matter" whose identity can be shaped according to social or personal desire.
Gender as a Gateway to Deviance and Gender Transition
Why do they insist on this wicked term despite its proven failure scientifically and morally? The reason is that the term "gender" is the "package" through which deviance, gender transition, and sexual perversion enter our countries.
When this term is established in local laws, it is later interpreted according to United Nations interpretations that open the door to "multiple sexual orientations." Thus, the bodies and mental and physical health of Muslims become assets for the capitalists and those who conspire with them to destroy the family and society.
Sales Representatives of Intellectual Waste
Those who promote the concept of "social gender" in our countries for money or career promotions are, in fact, "sales representatives" of intellectual waste taken from the minds of Money and de Beauvoir. They sell their religion and the future of their societies for a small offer from this world and contribute to the destruction of the sound fitrah with which God has distinguished man.
Conclusion and Future Questions
I've taken up a lot of your time, esteemed audience, but there are many questions we need to address in our upcoming episodes, God willing:
- How is this wicked concept promoted under the guise of verses from the Noble Quran sometimes?
- What are the subtle methods used to deceive people, exploiting the lack of critical thinking?
- How does Satan lure humans to delve deeper into error instead of acknowledging it?
- What are the profound lessons learned from the story of "David Reimer" that every parent should be aware of?
We ask you to be active in sharing this episode under the hashtag #Gender_Intellectual_Waste, for God tests you with deniers to see how you respond.
Peace be upon you, and may the mercy and blessings of God be with you.