← Back to Videos

This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic

Do you think men can get pregnant?

January 17, 2026

Imagine! For five minutes this doctor kept evading a question that is exactly like 1+1 = 2, even though she claims to follow science and evidence, just as some of our own people say "I believe in science" then promote myths and stab at rational, scientific, and religious facts in the name of science. This evasive doctor, supporter of malicious agendas, is present in all the banners, titles, and advertisements of "Gender" spread like a burden on the heart in Muslim lands. This term which is intended to drag our societies to the abyss that Western societies suffer from and which the interrogator in the clip expresses disgust for. I advise every father/mother/teacher to bring their children and say to them: Let us see a model of the scammers, the pretenders of science, the soldiers of Iblis in fighting the natural disposition, how their argument is refuted and their falsehood is exposed. So take your precautions, and educate your children!

Dialogue on Biological Facts and Identity

Evading the Answer and Seeking the Purpose

The dialogue began with a fundamental question: "Do you believe that men can become pregnant?" The response was characterized by hesitation and uncertainty about the purpose of the discussion. The speaker stated that he cares for patients with diverse identities, including many women and individuals with multiple identities. At this point, the conversation stopped, with the speaker explaining that he was unsure about the perspective being presented.

However, the other party insisted that the goal was to reach "the truth" and prove the existence of a fixed biological truth. The doctor was reminded of what he had stated in his previous testimony, that science and evidence should be the arbiters and decisive factors in these matters, away from political agendas.

Science Between Evidence and Political Agendas

The question was repeated clearly: "Can men become pregnant?", especially since the doctor emphasized that medicine should be guided by science. However, the response was that science and evidence confirm - according to the doctor's claim - that men are capable of pregnancy, considering that questions requiring a "yes" or "no" answer are merely political tools.

In contrast, this logic was rejected, and it was emphasized that these questions are about truth and not just theories, as they affect real people's lives. Since the doctor was called as an expert who follows science, his credibility as a scientist was put to the test based on his answer to this simple and fundamental question.

Biological Distinction Between Male and Female

The dialogue shifted to the distinction between concepts, emphasizing that there is a fundamental biological difference between male and female. Women are the ones who can become pregnant, and this is a scientific fact that should not be confused. The questioning party pointed out that refusing to acknowledge this basic truth makes it difficult to take other scientific claims seriously.

Health issues related to women's well-being were also discussed, such as the side effects of certain medications, which data show cause harm at rates exceeding officially announced figures. It was considered that denying the biological truth of men and women is part of a broader neglect of scientific facts.

In conclusion, it was emphasized that stating there is a scientific difference between men and women is not a controversial matter but a truth that must be protected. The constitution provides unique protection for women based on their biological nature.

Denying the recognition of women as women and men as men is destructive to science, public trust, and constitutional protection. The conversation ended with a reference that attempting to impose a political agenda that clashes with natural and biological facts is disheartening and leads to polarization that does not serve society.