← Back to Videos
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah.
Dear respected individuals, you are aware that the news circulating now is about Sweden and child abduction. Sweden completely denies that it abducts children, and some channels, such as the American-supported Al-Hurra, support this claim. It announced or published a news item titled "Sweden Responds to the Abduction of Muslim Children" in quotation marks, meaning this term used is an inaccurate term.
Alright, let's see what this news says. Al-Hurra states: "The Swedish Psychological Defense Agency, a government institution aimed at combating disinformation, said that an Arabic-language website whose founders support the Daesh organization is behind the disinformation campaign." Ah, so those behind the campaign against Sweden are people who support Daesh.
But wait, many Muslims have spoken, not just one or two or three websites, and many Muslims have provided evidence and indications. No, let's assume that all of you are "Daesh," we will not take your word, Muslims, all of you are either influenced by this organization or you are part of this organization. It's not reasonable that a country like Sweden, this Scandinavian country, known for its beauty, justice, prosperity, freedom, and inclusivity, would suddenly abduct children? Fear Allah, Muslims, do not slander Sweden.
Therefore, in this statement, we will not take your word, Muslims, but rather we will take the word of people who have nothing to do with Islam at all to see what they say about Sweden.
Alright, let's first see this report from the NCHR. NCHR is an acronym for the "Nordic Committee for Human Rights," meaning the Nordic Committee representing Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and possibly Iceland for human rights. The Nordic Committee for Human Rights.
This committee issued a report in 2012. First, the title of the report: "Child Removal, Cases of Child Removal in Sweden and Neighboring Countries." Let's see who wrote this report, perhaps they are also Daesh! Let's see. Of course, I will provide you with all the sources in the comments, God willing, so that you can review them and verify the accuracy of the translation.
The text in the report says: "We, the undersigned, former lawyers, judges, law professors, psychologists, forensic psychologists, and a doctor from Sweden, including lawyers and members of the steering committee of the Nordic Committee for Human Rights to protect family rights in Nordic countries." So these are the authors of the report, and all of them are from Sweden.
Alright, can they also be Daesh as described by Swedish news? I know that the report is from 2012, and therefore I know that this organization appeared in 2012, and we have not heard that it had reached Sweden at that time, and that some of its members became lawyers, judges, law professors, and psychology professors. We have not heard this, and therefore it is assumed that they have no connection to Daesh.
They say: "We send this request to the Council of Europe, the Ministerial Committee, and the European Parliament to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the very prevalent and destructive cases of child removal that are practiced daily in neighboring Nordic countries." They are talking about the title of Sweden, meaning Sweden and its neighbors. Let's see the text in English for the strange part: "The very prevalent and destructive cases of child removal that are practiced daily." This report was written by people from Sweden who are not Muslims, at least in the majority, if not all non-Muslims.
By the way, this report has an abstract and a "full report," meaning there is an abstract of the report and a full report. In the abstract, you will find this sentence in the abstract, meaning background on the topic, translated as follows: "Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Sweden and Nordic countries have had laws that grant social authorities the power to forcibly remove children from parental care, and it seems that this happens on arbitrary grounds and then they are placed in care homes or institutions with people completely foreign to them."
In the same report, in the detailed report, the full report that we will publish for you, God willing, you will see this paragraph. What does this paragraph say in summary? They say in it: "From our experience, social services in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland, therefore not just Sweden, target single-parent families, meaning it could be a mother whose husband has died or has not entered Sweden or has divorced her, or a man whose wife has died or is not with him. Social services target this family more, the economically and educationally weaker ones, those with health problems, and immigrant families." Immigrant families, for those who say the issue has nothing to do with being an immigrant or not, this committee mentioned immigrant families.
They also say: "Parents with religious and philosophical beliefs that seem politically inappropriate are often considered unfit parents, leading to their children being taken from them and placed in alternative homes." Ah, so this committee from ten years ago says that those whose religion is not suitable for us, not suitable for Swedish authorities, and whose philosophical beliefs are not suitable for Swedish authorities, are more targeted by social services in Sweden and others to have their children taken from them and given to alternative families, leading to their children being taken and placed in alternative homes.
From the beginning of the 1980s, the report says: "A large number of families have fled Sweden to protect their children from being taken to alternative homes." So there are working families that flee, flee from the 1980s after seeing what others are exposed to.
Alright, let's look at another source. Is this source ISIS? No, it's not ISIS. Let's see this source, esteemed guests, it's the "Kompas" newspaper. This is "Kompas" or the "Kompas" newspaper. This "Kompas" newspaper is supported by the Swedish government and is Arabic-speaking. What's the evidence that it's supported? We will prove it for you in the comments, God willing, and this is announced. They are not ashamed of it at all.
So, in the "Kompas" newspaper, you see this report titled: "Seminar on Children Taken by the Social Services (Social Welfare)". Therefore, a seminar was held on this topic, in which year? 2018. You will be surprised by the extreme frankness in this report. What is the point, meaning words are said in halls and then nothing happens, let everyone say what they have to say, no problem, so that Sweden appears as a democratic, fair, and free country according to their words, and then that's it, nothing is implemented. Whoever wants to implement a certain agenda will implement it, and let everyone bang their head against the wall, no problem, say whatever you want.
Within this report on the "Kompas" website, which is loyal to the Swedish government, let's read together: "Then the activist" after they talk with many introductions and there were comedic paragraphs and I don't know what, "then the activist Elizabeth" is Elizabeth ISIS? No, she's not ISIS, and she doesn't seem to be Muslim from her name. "Then the activist Elizabeth gave her speech and talked about her journey and the history of the Social Welfare law in Sweden, and mentioned that the Social Welfare Department does not implement the law as it is written, and that the reports of the Social Welfare Department are approved in court at a rate of nearly 98%". What does this mean? Does the Social Welfare want the court to stamp what they want.
"And that when she decided with about 40 lawyers to protest against the Social Welfare for its arbitrariness and non-compliance, it did not avail, so she turned to the European Court". This Elizabeth has forty lawyers, the Social Welfare did not respond to them, okay, or the Social Welfare Sweden did not respond to them, so she turned to the European Court, "and they were not allowed to speak there to shed light on this case for only five minutes". Do you see justice? Do you see justice in the European Court? She was allowed to speak for five minutes after all that effort and that's it.
"She continued: In 2010, seventeen thousand two hundred children were taken, she said and this is a terrifying number, and until 2014, thirty-two thousand children were taken". And she added: "The government spends enormous amounts of money on families where children are placed, estimated in the millions". The alternative Swedish families who are atheist or Christian or a man with a man practicing sex or a woman with a woman, no problem.
"There is an incorrect situation," says Elizabeth: "There is an incorrect situation because the Social Welfare works to tempt the detained child and provides him with what he wants, meaning they provide what he wants, in order for him not to return to his family according to what Elizabeth mentioned". So Elizabeth is telling you that the Social Welfare tempts the boy: We will give you what you want, your parents are not suitable for you, don't go back to your father. "As for the salary that is paid, it is estimated between twenty thousand and forty thousand kronor monthly, and this is a serious project, and the serious thing is not only depriving the child of his original culture, but they work to tempt him and tell him if you want to go anywhere we will send you, and they tell him we are ready to buy you the latest mobile phone if you want, and all of this is to convince the child to stay with them and show him that his parents cannot buy such things".
Now, in the same report: "One of the attendees asked about how to deal with the trick of the hosting family to avoid the child attending the interview that the Social Welfare determines with his parents by tempting him with a trip and an enjoyable activity outside the home". Meaning now the original is to take the boy from the family and put him with a Swedish family. The Swedish family wants to manipulate so that the boy does not see his parents, so they go and tell him: Come, let's take you to the park, come, let's take you to a sports activity, so that he does not see his parents. Unfortunately, yes.
So the lawyer Paula, her name is Paula, another lawyer, responded: "This method should not exist, but action is one thing and the law is another, and they are not supposed to follow that method but they are supposed to facilitate the meeting so as not to confuse the child's ideas". Meaning nothing is supposed to happen, but unfortunately it happens. It happens and the hosting family, the stealing family, takes the boy and prevents him from seeing his father, and so on and much talk.
Now one meaning every six months a lawsuit is filed that we want to retrieve the child. So one of the attendees said: "I file a lawsuit every six months up to ten years". Paula answered: "There are people who do not have experience, so a lawyer should be appointed to do this task". And as she mentioned, unfortunately it's true. Due to lack of experience, things go six months after six months until things go on for several years without the parents knowing. So yes, it is possible that the matter drags on for many years and you file case after case to retrieve your children and you cannot retrieve them.
And the lawyer Jihad said: No madam Jihad is a Muslim, no no we won't take the word of a Muslim. Of course the meaning is also the same, that he speaks about these stealing families being paid huge amounts and therefore they manipulate to keep the boy with them in any way.
Then Sheikh Hassan spoke, an imam of one of the mosques in Malmö, and said: "I will speak about an experience of thirty years in Sweden. I worked as an imam in the grand mosque and worked in divorce cases and I work as a consultant and expert for the state. And an expert for the state in religious and social affairs. And I will give you advice from a brother to his brothers. And the first point is: the Social Welfare does not knock on your door, but you are the one who knocks on their door. You are the one who knocks on their door".
Disappointment to you, O imam of the mosque, because these are the ones who usually come to defend Sweden and beautify the image of Sweden. The lawyer Elizabeth and the lawyer Paula and the committee composed of people who have nothing to do with Islam, they are the ones saying that they steal children and tempt them so that they do not return to their families. And His Excellency Sheikh Hassan, the consultant and expert for the state in religious and social affairs, and from these people, you come to break the back. He tells him: No no the speech is not correct. You are the reason that your children are taken from you. From such people, the misfortunes come to all.
The last question, all of this is related to the article, who is it for, folks? The article is in "the comps," the newspaper loyal to the Swedish government. The last question, meaning in the same report. The last question was about the topic of the child who died in an attack by a ferocious dog at one of the foster families in the city of Örebro, and wondered about the responsibility while he was in the protection home.
Imagine now the feeling of two Muslim parents who had their son taken from them and left with a family, and this family neglected him, got angry at him, for whatever reason, vented on him, God knows what happened, and then a dog devours and gnaws at his flesh. And the family knows that their son was devoured and his flesh was gnawed, God knows if they deliver this torn flesh or not. So, he asked: I wonder what happens in this case? The answer is simple: social services are not held accountable, but those foster families are held accountable. The protection home, social services have no relation.
As you saw also in Abdullah Al-Sharif's episode, there are cases, for example, a case of a girl given to a man on the basis that he is her alternative father and he raped her a hundred times, and when this court was discovered, there is no problem here. Social services have no relation, and the only task of social services is to kidnap the children and hand them over to alternative families and whatever happens, a dog gnaws at them, they are raped, there is no problem at all.
After this, there was a 20-minute coffee break during the conference, and after the conference ended, the lawyers answered some questions and an association presented everyone who participated and attended this conference, and presented bouquets of flowers to all the lawyers. Please take the bouquets and that's it, there is no problem. Everyone goes home, and after drinking coffee and taking a bouquet of flowers, things remain as they are. Of course, there is no problem in publishing such news as long as there is no action, no act, no action. Leave us alone.
When does the problem arise? Ah, when a big fuss is made and the Muslims raise it and the spotlight is on Sweden. Okay, they kidnap the children, and we believe, sir, okay. Can it not be that in most cases these children benefit psychologically, socially, and morally? Okay, we are present, we are evaluating with you, their hereafter is lost, they have disbelieved, and they have lost Islam. But can they, worldly, be, for example, their morals and culture have improved, and they live a life of luxury and happiness?
Come on, let's see, sir, let's see in this paper titled, of course, this paper is from "Wiley Online Library" (Wiley Online Library) and it has 132 references. A paper that was published but even when it is published in scientific circles, no one cares, they drink its water as long as there is no media hype and spotlight.
The title of the paper talks about children who were placed outside their homes, either with foster families or in centers, meaning not with their parents. These cases were followed up, 718 cases, and the paper was published in 2008. Now, this paper does not necessarily talk about Muslim children who were taken from their parents, but about some of them, meaning according to the expression in the paper, they have behavioral problems and there are other reasons. The important thing is that social services in Sweden supervised them, this paper is about Sweden supervised them, and let's see now how beautiful social services upbringing is.
Look, folks, of course in the "abstract" (Abstract) which is a summary of the study, I will read briefly: "It was noted among the young men and women in the first group compared to their peers who did not enter care, those who did not enjoy social services care, that there were very high rates of early death, serious involvement in crime, hospitalization due to mental health problems, teenage pregnancy, meaning one could have become pregnant out of wedlock and thus became a young mother, self-support problems, meaning unable to find himself, and low academic achievement."
Until they say: "High rates of hospitalization due to mental health problems were noted among young people who were placed due to behavioral problems, and it was found that failure and change of placement with foster families was a strong indicator of poor long-term prognosis after Prognosis in the long term." The effects are catastrophic. In this same paper, the scientific paper published, they talk about the results of the children who were placed in these care homes.
Well, at the age of 25 of those in the sample that was monitored, at the age of 25, 70% of them were in prison or dead. Not one of them, not one of them was living a normal life, meaning if we take into account all the criteria that were set. Therefore, folks, this is the upbringing of social services.
Let's see this report that was published by Swedish television in an investigative report in November 2020, meaning how long ago? A year and a bit, about the exposure of children and adolescents to various forms of abuse: beating, addiction, sexual exploitation in children and adolescents care centers affiliated with the social affairs authority (social services) in Sweden. The investigation included about two hundred out of about a thousand centers existing in Sweden. So, many of the children are exposed to beating, addiction, sexual exploitation.
Of course, evil me says to you: Suppose the child's father or mother used to shout at him or insult him or humiliate him. Ah, what is it? Of course, I tell you that this will certainly happen, certainly happen in some families, the child may be beaten, may be insulted, may be humiliated, may be possible. We are not defending this at all, of course. But look at the paradise that will go to when he goes with social services: you have suicide, death, psychological complexes, early death, sexual exploitation, and so on.
Well, after all this, let's read in the same newspaper loyal or in one of the newspapers loyal to the Swedish government, which is "Aktuellt" in Arabic: "In the safe hands of social services." Look at them, proud, proud of the great achievement of the year 2020. "How many children and young people were cared for by the social services department (social services) during 2020?" They boast about these great achievements: 27,300 who received care during 2020. Now, the most notable thing about them is 33% of this number, which is about 9,000, talks about compulsory care. We will resist you, my son, against your will, we will take you from your parents' home and care for you against your will. And look at the title: "In safe hands," and look at how safe they really are.
Other sources! Let's see other sources! This petition was published a long time ago with the title: "Release our children." Its subject was that we want to stop this farce that is happening and what social services do in terms of taking children from families. Hundreds of people participated in it before the Russian television closed this speech.
Look at the news eleven years ago, eleven years ago, news with the title: "Stolen by Swedish social services or Russian mother severely criticizes the authorities for taking her twin daughters." Look at the country, the two poor girls were taken from their mother against their will. Who took them? Social services. Who is talking about this? Russian television eleven years ago.
Alright, come on, after we've seen these non-Daesh sources and their words about what's happening in Sweden at the hands of the socialists, let's read again what the Swedish media is saying currently. On Swedish television SVT, this expert from the Swedish Psychological Defense Agency says: "A campaign of threats against Swedish authorities, Islamists demanding terrorist attacks." God is the greatest! And on Swedish radio: "A campaign of threats against Sweden, calls for terrorist acts."
By God, they weren't lying to us in this blatant manner while we see for ourselves that the workers are talking about you, they are not workers of terrorism or extremism or anything of the sort. How do you want us to trust your narrative of events? And some of them, unfortunately, unfortunately, meaning he calls himself an imam. And Swedish official websites celebrate his words. By God, just stop. By God, put your tongue in your mouth and stop.
These farces and tragedies have been happening throughout the past period. You did not help the parents in retrieving their children. And the parents complain about you, saying that we have knocked on the doors of the heads of the Islamic community and institutions, and you did not help us nor did you rescue us with anything. You did not warn people not to migrate to Sweden, nor did you inform them that honor, the culture of honor, is forbidden in Sweden, nor did you do anything concrete on the ground to retrieve the children of Muslims in Sweden, but rather the original, retrieve the children of people, we called for everyone. You did not do anything but legal demands, perhaps weak and faint. Bang your head against six hundred walls, the Swedish authorities will do what they want in the end and will not allow anyone to object, and whoever objects, do you want to do it?
Then, after that, when your Muslim brothers in the world rose to rescue these poor people, when the world rose for their support, you came to philosophize to them and say: You have no call, you are in Sweden, you do not know anything about Sweden. By God, stop, by God, stop, lend us your silence, this is what we want to say, people.
And in order to know the extent of the reliability and credibility of these sources, look at them, they were the ones who, when the speech was not effective, published the news, when the speech became effective, they themselves on the same sites turned the story 180 degrees. No one threatened you with terrorist attacks as you say nor acts of this kind at all. Just stop your oppression against Muslims, return their children to them, do not kidnap them. And we say to the Muslims: If this talk continues, it is forbidden for you to stay in this country. A country where honor is forbidden, it is forbidden for you to stay there. Either it changes or you leave. And peace be upon you and the mercy of God.