← Back to The Journey of Certainty
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
"Tarzan" must remain hanging in the air, but the ropes he hangs by keep breaking one by one. Therefore, we must keep providing him with more ropes throughout the hour to keep him hanging in the air. Thus is the myth of "spontaneous evolution": ropes are cut, evidence is refuted, forgeries are exposed, yet after keeping the myth hanging, its followers keep providing it with more ropes so that it does not fall.
Who supports the theory of evolution so that it does not fall? What is their interest? What is the story behind their saying, "Even if it turns out that this piece of evidence for the theory is incorrect, it does not matter? There are so many pieces of evidence." What is the problem if science reveals the falsity of the forged evidence? Does this not indicate the integrity of Western science that we criticize? This is what we will learn in this episode, so stay tuned...
(Sound effects)
The theory of evolution was born 160 years ago. If you look at its alleged evidence and supposed mechanisms at that time, you would know that its followers now admit the inaccuracy of much of it. Yet, they insist on the validity of the theory. Why? Because, according to their claim, there is a lot of evidence that has emerged since then. The theory came out of the bottle in a moment in time and became "unquestionable" in English: no dispute in it, not subject to questioning or doubt. Therefore, its followers gave themselves the right to wear "Darwinian" glasses to look at everything in the world.
If it turns out that a piece of evidence they have held onto for years is false, they repeat their well-known phrase: "Even if, it does not matter, there are so many pieces of evidence for the theory of evolution."
Let us review the timeline. There will be repetition in some of the titles, brothers, but we will bring new information under these titles that serves the topic of our episode.
In Darwin's life, a group of ropes were extended to his myth. First: the Archaeopteryx fossil discovered in 1861 in Germany, upon which Darwin and his followers built the idea of the evolution of birds from dinosaurs. They consider it the strongest evidence for this, considering it the intermediate link between dinosaurs and birds, and gave it an alleged timeline.
Then, after 140 years in the year 2000, a fossil of a bird was discovered that dismantled this timeline, and the journal Science published that it might precede the Archaeopteryx. The New York Times published an article titled: "Discovery of a fossil threatening the theory of bird evolution." Why does it threaten it? Because even to "fix" the Darwinian scenario, the first bird to appear should be within a specific time frame. They claimed that the Archaeopteryx is this bird that should not have any bird before it. Then they are surprised by this discovery of a bird that they estimate was 75 million years before the Archaeopteryx.
Then discoveries followed until Nature published an article in 2011 titled: "Archaeopteryx is no longer the first bird." The article began with the sentence: "Analysis of the fossil's characteristics indicates that Archaeopteryx is not a bird at all." "Not a bird at all." By God! Did they wake up? Meaning after 150 years, you discovered that one of your biggest supporters for the myth was a mistake?!
Okay, why are you upset? Here is science correcting itself, what is the problem? No, no problem... except that this mistake was part of what the myth was consecrated in the minds of generations over a century and a half, and its images spread in textbooks and scientific websites. No problem except that even after this rope was cut, the myth's Tarzan did not fall; because he had already clung to new ropes. No problem, except that the followers of the myth remain asleep or oblivious to the cutting of this rope, so they keep repeating it even after the scientific invalidity is exposed, as in this film produced for children in 2015: "Welcome... I am Dr. Scott, an expert in ancient biology, and this is the Archaeopteryx." "Archaeopteryx." No problem... except that in 2015, when did this bird or the ancient wing live? 145 million years ago. Meaning within the correct range.
With the cutting of the Archaeopteryx rope, do they admit the fall of the myth? No... why? (Do you have any knowledge, then bring it out to us) [Al-An'am: 148]. Yes, there are a lot of evidence. Bring them on.
They said: We found a fossil of the coelacanth fish, it is clear that it is a creature that evolved 400 million years ago and became extinct 66 million years ago, it is the transitional link between fish and amphibians. And it is clear that it used to live near the surface of the sea and had two lungs. See? Those are the lungs. Do you know why it has two lungs? To prepare it to transform into amphibians that will form the genus of all land creatures after that. And its full fins are the beginnings of feet.
Then, if the coelacanth is discovered alive in 1938, and in large numbers! It is not extinct from millions of years, nothing. And in the depths of the oceans; not near the surface of the sea! And it has two air sacs; not lungs! And it refuted all their claims, and the falsity of this alleged transitional link appeared completely. Even Nature published this article which stated: "Half a century of research shows that it - meaning the coelacanth - is not the hoped-for missing link between fish and terrestrial vertebrates." Therefore, the rope of the transitional creature was cut as the rope of the transitional between reptiles and birds was cut.
Did they admit the fall of Tarzan? No! But they said: "The coelacanth is alive?!" Then, this is evidence that it stopped evolving millions of years ago, time forgot it, and thus the coelacanth is a living fossil, meaning a living evidence among us about evolution and the correctness of our theory. "This coelacanth fish, this fish is a living fossil described as: that it is a living fossil, a living researcher, living from hundreds of millions of years as it is, this fish was a great discovery in the world of science, and in the world of the theory of evolution."
If the coelacanth is extinct, it is evidence of evolution, and if it is not extinct, it is also evidence of evolution! If it lived near the surface of the sea, this is evidence of evolution! If the opposite appears; that it is in the depths, this is also evidence of evolution! If it had two lungs, this indicates evolution! If they are not two lungs, this is also evidence of evolution! Yes, we have the right to interpret things in this way; the evidence of evolution is very numerous!
(Sound effects)
Before it was acknowledged that the coelacanth is not transitional, another rope was extended to Darwin: Haeckel's embryo drawings, which show a significant similarity between the embryos of different creatures. Darwin was very pleased with them. This rope was extended to Darwin in 1868: "Embryos of creatures are similar in the early stages, which means they have a shared origin!" Flawed logic, even if the claim of similarity were true, and yet the claim was not true; with many accusations from embryologists against Haeckel of forging his drawings, he was forced in 1909 to admit in an article published by the journal München Allgemeine Zeitung that 6-8% of the drawings were forged! And Haeckel tried to justify this forgery! The evidence, oh Haeckel, showed you something different from 6-8% as you notice...
By the way, what makes me think that Haeckel actually admitted? Am I quoting someone here, as it pleases those who are completely bankrupt in arguments and have failed to respond to what we present, so they started repeating: "You are repeating the words of the Christian creationists." No, my dear friends... look for another nonsense to counter our presentation; for I - praise be to God - strive for accuracy to the utmost, and I do not parrot like parakeets of superstition. I even asked brothers in Germany to bring me Haeckel's original article in German, and they did, thankfully, went to the Munich library, then obtained the electronic link to the article and translated it for me, and we will put the links in the comments for verification.
We return; Haeckel admitted in an evasive manner, - the important thing is that he admitted! Why are you angry? Here is science correcting itself, negating its evil, and revealing the truths, so what is the problem? Never, there is no problem except that the "scientific" books in schools and universities remained referring to Haeckel's forged drawings for 100 years. 100 years! 100 years after the evasive admission, and research is published that completely contradicts Haeckel's drawings. As in this scientific paper titled: "There are no preserved embryonic stages." Meaning very similar "evolutionarily" among vertebrates. Which reviewed many of the efforts made in the field in detail and reached the following conclusion: "Our research seriously undermines the credibility of Haeckel's drawings." And the scientific books are in a deep sleep, and they continue to publish the forged drawings after this, and this is a list of 13 different books, some of which continued to publish them until recently.
It is only in recent years that these drawings have begun to disappear from books; to put in their place a new rope for Tarzan to fill the gap of embryonic evidence for evolution; so they said: "There is a similarity between arches present in the fish embryo and the human embryo; which indicates their shared origin." Just to inform you, brothers, these arches are the ones that later turn into gills in the fish, which it needs to breathe underwater, while in humans they turn into structures in the ear, which are needed for hearing, and into the parathyroid gland that regulates blood calcium. Structures that have no relation to each other, neither near nor far, in function between the fish and the human. Yet, their external similarity is evidence - to them - of the shared origin. Yes, the gap of embryonic evidence for evolution must be filled and not left empty. And God knows how long they will sleep on this joke, before they remove it as well from the books.
Darwin died reassured that there are ropes for his Tarzan. Then came after him the German anatomist: Robert Wiedersheim to extend another rope, as he published in 1893 a list of 86 vestigial organs that he believed had no use. Of course, this list collapsed in turn as we have previously mentioned.
Yes,... science cuts the ropes of Tarzan's fabricated ones like Haeckel's embryos, or those based on ignorance like Wiedersheim's list. But after how much exploitation of these ropes to serve superstition and the destruction of humanity!
"Piltdown Man" was a hoax spun for (Tarzan) the myth in 1912, and cut off in 1953 after it was revealed to the scientific community that it was a forgery. So, in these 41 years before the forgery was discovered, how much research and notes were published about this Piltdown skull according to the Nature website? More than 500 research papers and notes. Click on this link and look at the research titles: "Analysis of the Piltdown skull's jaw," "Analysis of the first and second lower molars of the Piltdown skull," and one of them writes the research and refers to it from 105 other researches, a game, people... a game of children in every sense of the word! More than 500 research papers and notes on a forged skull.
And we must remind you, brothers, that the idea of transitional fossils is, from its very foundation, a highly comedic idea as we detailed in the episodes: (Speak to them as children), and (Who stole the million) when we explained that: with extreme leniency, the myth requires the availability of an endless number of transitional creatures above and below the ground. So, when you learn that the idea of transitional creatures deals with creatures in a Photoshop-like, magical, funny way, ignoring genetic coding, differences in internal organs, cell compositions, and most importantly, it ignores their deliberate denial of transitioning from one creature to another. Meaning: there is no one who intends to transform one creature into another; as their gradual lines suggest, but the creature moves "haphazardly" in every direction. So, you can imagine after that how comedic it is for them to hold a skull like (Piltdown), or fossils like (Archaeopteryx), and polish them to pieces as if they indicate the validity of their myth.
During the hoax of (Piltdown), the hoax of (Nebraska Man) was spun for the myth in 1922 based on a tooth, until it was revealed that it was a pig's tooth in 1927, and the hoax was cut off. But after what? After this tooth helped start teaching Darwin's myth in schools in many American states. When it was discovered that it was a pig's tooth, was the myth removed from the books? Of course not... because even if this evidence falls, there are many, many other pieces of evidence, let's see one of them...
After the hoaxes of (Piltdown) and (Nebraska) were cut off, they found a jaw, assumed it to be a transitional link between humans and animal ancestors, and named it Ramapithecus. They drew a complete picture based on this jaw, and (Tarzan) remained hanging on this rope until the early eighties, after many researches refuting the relationship of this creature with humans, so they no longer mention it...
But... in 1974, meaning before the hoax of (Ramapithecus) was cut off, they had already spun the rope of the Lucy fossil, which they claimed belonged to a semi-human, and gave it a resonant scientific name: Australopithecus afarensis. After more than 30 years, this rope began to break with research conducted by doctors who are followers of the myth, who said that their research raises doubts about the role of (Lucy) as an ancestor of humans. This distinguished article by our brothers in (Muslim Researchers) titled: (Google and the Lucy Fossil) shows you in detail the extent of forgery and deception in the reasoning with this fossil.
After spinning the rope of (Lucy) by a year, meaning in 1975, the German professor of human origins, Reiner von Zieten, began to spin ropes for (Tarzan) over 30 years with many skulls that he claimed belonged to transitional stages between humans and animal ancestors. Books were filled with his output before he was discovered; where a committee from the University of Frankfurt issued a decision condemning him for forgery in these alleged evidences over 30 years, and the news of (Reiner) spread on global sites, and (Reiner) did not forget to benefit himself from the service of the myth; as he agreed with those who bought chimpanzee skulls from him "alleged evidence of evolution," as if he was telling people: come and buy the skulls of your first ancestors! Exactly as the men of the church benefited from people's belief in the myth, (indulgences).
During the hanging of (Reiner's) ropes, the rope of the Archaeoraptor bird was spun for (Tarzan) in 1999, and National Geographic placed it as a cover image, and the fossil was sold for $80,000, then the rope was cut off in 2001, and Nature published that it was a forged fossil!
After the ropes of (Reiner) and (Lucy) were cut off, (Tarzan) clung to the rope of Ida, which was bought by the Norwegian doctor Jorn Hurum for a million dollars, and promoted it in the media as one of the first human ancestors, who lived 47 million years ago, and was given a resonant scientific name: Darwinius masillae in honor of (Darwin). Then media outlets said that she was the eighth wonder of the world. Google changed its logo for (Ida) and the BBC and History Channel released documentaries about her titled: "The Link." Then the journal (Nature) published an article refuting the connection of this fossil to humans, and said that it is closer to being an ancestor of the (lemur). Meaning, brothers... the greatness that your child may bring you, you tell him: go, dad, throw it away and wash your hands well. It is the same thing that the followers of (Tarzan) work on; noise, discoveries, and documentaries. Then the news sites quickly accused Dr. (Hurum) of deliberately tampering with his fossil to recover the money he paid for it.
Orce Man was a hoax spun for (Tarzan) in 1984; based on a part of a skull, and the hoax was cut off in 1997 after it was revealed that it was the skull of a small donkey! The Talk Origins website commented on the comedy of (Orce Man) and said: "Whatever the condition of the fossils; it does not affect the validity of the rest of the evidence of human evolution." Meaning, the evidence is very, very numerous... as usual!
Before the hoax of (Orce Man) was cut off, the hoax of the whale's hind limbs was spun for (Tarzan) in 1989, until it was cut off in 2014, and we detailed the details of this scandal in the episode: (Sleep Tight).
Do not worry, another foolish claim was made the same year. Dr. Karl Giberson, former vice president of the Biologos Foundation, presents a photo of a child with a tail in one of his lectures: (in English): "But some children have this, some children are born with tails, we have genes to build tails." So, Giberson considers this photo evidence of human evolution from animal origins, claiming that we humans have tail genes, but they only work in some people. However, Giberson was confronted with the fact that this photo is a fake! It was Photoshopped from a humorous website called cracked.com. And what he considers a tail gene that only works in some people, a remnant of animal origins, is in reality a gene that regulates cell growth, which every human needs. Not bad, huh, Giberson? I mean... Photoshopped images, lies in facts, and deception in everything, not bad for you!
How did Dr. Giberson respond? He replied that he was deceived by this photo, but the principle it contains is proven by other correct photos. That is, even if this is not correct, there are many, many pieces of evidence. Where are these other pieces of evidence? You go to them and find they are a mirage, a mirage...
A lot of DNA is "junk" (junk DNA) with no use, another foolish claim made and then abandoned after the publication of the Genome Project in 2012, and it is no longer mentioned.
Greetings, peace be upon you.
You may say to me: "Brother, there are sciences that had errors and were corrected, and people benefited from them." I say to you: Useful sciences, based on what does not contradict reason, innate disposition, and sense. As for the myth of evolution, we have shown you in previous episodes that it was born in contradiction to all of this and has remained completely useless. Put yourself, brother, in the place of the young man who was living before 100 years or more or less. He was told, just as you are told now: "The evidence for evolution is very numerous." Look at it now! Ropes have been cut, to the extent that even the followers of Tarzan admit it themselves.
You may say to me: "Alright, why do you talk about the evidence that the followers of the theory themselves have abandoned? Talk about the evidence they still cite." Here, I prove to you the principle of "Tarzanism," which the followers of the myth use. Every time a rope is cut, they extend another one... Otherwise, we have already addressed the ropes that Tarzan the myth currently relies on and cut them for you in previous episodes. You may not find them in their books after 10 years or even 20 years. But by then, new ropes may have been extended for Tarzan, and so on...
Yes, in the past episodes, we have cut the ropes, and from among the research, many of them are by the followers of Tarzan themselves.
Then: "Do you have any knowledge, then bring it forth to us" [Al-An'am: 148]. Where is your solid evidence that does not crumble when exposed to the needle of correct reason and respected scientific research? Where is your firm, coherent evidence? Is it in empty dazzle?! Or in mixing facts with myths?! Or in reasoning with ignorance?! Or in empty labels?! Or in addressing people as children?! Or in taking suspicions and doubts?! Or in "Khunfashariyya" and referring to the unknown?! Or in the list of 14 logical fallacies and psychological tricks we have discussed so far?! And today, we add the 15th trick: "Tarzanism"...
"Say, 'Do you have any knowledge, then bring it forth to us. You follow only conjecture, and you are but liars'" [Yunus: 36]. We want real science, not pseudo-science, not Photoshop, nor your Hollywood films that deceive the naive among people. We began the series of episodes with: "Bring your proof if you are truthful" [Al-Baqarah: 111] and are nearing its end with: This is the Quranic method: the method of science and evidence, not imaginations and myths. Our religion, by the grace of God, is based on firm, solid, coherent, independent evidence. In their light, we interpret the ambiguous verses, and the system harmonizes. Where do we find in your Darwinian religion a single firm evidence or a single solid, independent proof? Are you not, O followers of the myth, following the ambiguous parts of our religion seeking sedition to mislead people from it? Are you not hiding them from the firm evidence? So, what do you have to offer people? Except the ambiguous parts, illusions, and myths... "Say, 'Do you have any knowledge, then bring it forth to us.'"
There is a beautiful saying for the scholars of Hadith: that if a single hadith in all its routes is lost, fabricated, and accused of immorality, then the multiplicity of its routes only weakens and refutes it, and one does not strengthen the other. One person puts forth the hadith, another steals it from him, the third likes the lie and sees distinction in it, and then presents it to the people... Thus, when you see the followers of Tarzan the myth extending weak ropes, you know that they have done so only because they have lost the straight, firm, coherent evidence, so they resort to drowning in lies, just as their ancestors did when they said: "Do not listen to this Quran and make noise in it, perhaps you may overcome" [Fussilat: 26].
Remember, brothers, that we have cut all these ropes, but not only that, we have also shown that what is not fabricated among them is, in truth, evidence of the greatness of creation, and the manifestations of power, wisdom, and perfection, as in the episode: "The experiment of citrate-consuming bacteria," "Penguin wings," "The design of the eye," "The diversity of creatures with the similarity of genetic material," and much more... In these episodes, brothers, we have equipped ourselves with the keys that cut the ropes of the principles of these alleged evidence from their roots. That is, every idea of "members without benefit," we have shown you its invalidity and how to respond to them by showing that they practice the fallacy of arguing from ignorance and that the burden of proof lies on them. Every idea of "arguing from fossils," we have shown you its comedic nature and how to respond to them by obligating them to the consequences of their theory, as in the episode: "Who stole the million?" Every principle of "the ability of random mutations to do something," we have shown its comedic nature when we defined its meaning for you in the episode: "Address them as children." The principle of "resemblance," the principle of "referring to the unknown," and others... We have cut these principles from their roots so that if you hear of any new rope, you can place it in the appropriate category from the previous principles of deception. Do not trouble yourself to adjust your seat or get up from your place. Instead, cut their ropes and expose their veils that they use to hide the light of the sun, and do so in a scientific manner while you are relaxed in your place. If someone tries to deceive you, say to them: "We will never believe you. God has already informed us about your news" [At-Tawbah: 94]. We have seen your misguidance in the past, and we have seen how the Quran warned against most of your logical fallacies.
The Messenger of God (peace be upon him) said: "Trials are presented to the hearts like straw, one by one. Any heart that drinks them is marked with a black spot, and any heart that rejects them is marked with a white spot, until they become two types of hearts: one as white as crystal, which no trial harms as long as the heavens and the earth endure, and the other as black as a pitcher, blackened and hollow, knowing neither good nor evil except what it drinks from its desires" (Sahih Muslim). I ask God to make us and you among those with white hearts; followers of knowledge and guidance, not myths and desires; so that no trial, doubt, or pseudo-science harms us as long as the heavens and the earth endure. But it is expected of you, brother, after these episodes, not to be content with the stance of the refuter to what they present of veils and ropes, but to alert people to these fraudulent sellers who sell people cans of corrupt pseudo-science.
Therefore, my brothers, the summary of the (Tarzan-like) superstition problems we have mentioned is that even after the rope is cut off by scientific research, academic books and biased media continue to cling to the rope for a long time. And that the followers of (Tarzan) do not acknowledge its fall after the sequential disconnection of its ropes, but they repeat the parrot-like phrase: "Even if... the evidence is very numerous." The truth is that there are many lies that are still being fabricated, and that the rope is cut off after being used temporarily, in polluting the minds, beliefs, and morals of generations, and committing crimes against humanity.
The question remains: Who is supporting the ropes for (Tarzan)? And why? The claim that (99%) of scientists believe in the myth of evolution, we addressed this in detail in the previous episode. However, our question today is: Who truly supports it? Who is supporting the ropes for (Tarzan) so that he does not fall? There are many types of people:
First: Those whose professional lives depend on it; Evolutionary mythology has produced many academics who rely on it; whose scientific titles, academic degrees, professional lives, salaries, and positions depend on keeping (Tarzan) hanging in the air! Imagine saying to a specialist in (Evolutionary Biology): "We have proven that the true name of your specialization is: (Doctor of Mythological Biology)." What would be his reaction?
Second: Every failure to produce useful science, but who has an imagination to draw a semi-human from a jaw, or a tooth, or a skull, will support (Tarzan) with a rope. Every failure to produce useful science, but who can, with his wide comedic imagination, draw a scenario of how the senses or psychological tendencies originated through random mutations and blind selection, will support (Tarzan) with a rope... And you will find thousands of researches of this type, which are not worth the paper they are written on.
Third: All designers, producers, and directors of photoshopped images and Hollywood films dedicated to the myth in the minds, will support (Tarzan) with a rope.
Fourth: Every opportunist who hears about the spread of myths in the land of a people, comes to gather bones and stick them together, and sells them to them, as did Professor (Rainer) and other bone sellers, will support (Tarzan) with a rope. The matter has become a trade; as we saw with (Horum) and with (the Archaeoraptor) and others.
Fifth: Every charlatan among the priests of false science, thousands or millions of copies of his books are printed, saying that God is an illusion, the universe created itself from nothing, and falsifies science for that purpose, exploiting people's ignorance, selling them his lies and superstitions, and making money and fame, will support (Tarzan) with a rope.
Yes, evolutionary mythology has produced, over (160) years, a group of people who benefit and are attached to it, as it is attached to them. Enthusiastic soldiers in its service, who will support it with ropes and will not allow it to fall; because its fall is their fall; for many of them do not know how to serve except the idol of the myth, and they do not eat bread except from its service. The relationship between these people and (Tarzan) is a relationship of a rope hanging on both sides of a fulcrum; (Tarzan) the myth depends on them, and they depend on it, and the fall of one means the fall of the other. For some of them, the fall of (Tarzan) means in his mind sleeping in the street and raising signs: "homeless".
Okay, let's convince him that this is more honorable for him than falsifying science and misleading people, let's convince him to rely on Allah, and to prefer the truth over creation, and to adhere to scientific integrity. Have you forgotten? These meanings - brothers - mean nothing (to the evolutionist); because they are accidental feelings, brought by random mutations; for this chemical waste called man. And it is funny to see young people who are disgusted by the merchants of religion - and they are indeed present - then [trust] in the merchants of the myth as if they will be endowed with scientific integrity, and present you with the facts for the sake of Allah the Almighty.
As for those who depend on the myth in their lives, they fall into a psychological state that does not allow their minds to go beyond certain tracks; thinking about the invalidity of the theory of evolution - just thinking about it - is forbidden! The dark images of their future without (Tarzan) stand in the way of freeing their minds from the myth. It is slavery, like other pre-Islamic forms of slavery. Those who came before them created for them the idol of the myth, they followed the path and found themselves dependent on this idol in their livelihoods, and they cannot, or do not want, to get rid of this slavery. They have become new artisans of the idol of the myth; the idol must remain, and achievements and miracles of habit must be attributed to it, even though they are among those: (They cannot create even a fly, even if they gather together) [Al-Hajj: 73] but it must remain, so that people continue to throw money into its pot, which the artisans collect.
The world after the Nixon shock "Nixon shock" when the link between gold and the dollar was broken became the same; their ropes are extended to America because its fall means their economic fall, and their fall means its fall. Each one pulls the rope for the other. The entourage of corrupt presidents strive to defend the dignity of the president; because his existence is a matter of fate for them; his fall means their fall, just as their fall means his fall. Thus, the old and new forms of ignorance in general. And this distinguishes them from faith in Allah, where the rope is extended from Allah to the people, and He is not in need of them nor dependent on them; but all creation is in need of His rope, glorified be He. So read and contemplate this meaning, the saying of Allah the Almighty: (And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided.) [Al-Imran: 103]
Does this mean that only the beneficiaries and the failures support the myth of evolution? No...; but there are other types of rope supporters. Sixth: Everyone who has a problem with the church and does not want to seek another correct religion; for him, the division is binary: either the church or evolution. Likewise, everyone who has a psychological problem with faith, or wants to take his desire as his god and wants, at the same time, to appear consistent with himself based on scientific foundations, not bestial lust, will support (Tarzan) with a rope.
We detailed - brothers - in an episode: (Worshipers of Microbes) that the word: "Evolution" (in English): evolution has become exactly equal to the phrase: "No creation by intention and will" and that it has been completely emptied of its content, and from randomness and negligence, and its followers have differed in it to the extreme, but they agree on one thing: (denial of creation). Then we explained in two episodes: (The God of the Atheists' Gaps) and (The Abducted) that the virus of materialism - which is the basis of the myth of random evolution - is nothing but a mask for atheism. And we mentioned the words of "scientists" who confirmed that no matter how ridiculous and contrary to reason and logic their interpretations seem, they must be accepted so that religion does not intervene again; for "the theory of evolution" is an atheistic religion, a religion in the true sense of the word, and its followers defend it, and support it with ropes, just as a person defends his religion.
This all comes together with the state's support for (Darwinism); where the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) organization in America, for example, was granted a financial grant that it used starting from the year 1963 to fill textbooks with concepts of the myth of evolution. The spaces allocated for this in the books increased more than tenfold; under the pretext of its compatibility with the secular state constitution, considering creation a religion, and evolution a science. This is despite the activity of the "Teach the Controversy" movement, which demanded that students be informed in the curricula about the criticisms of the theory of evolution; so that they can think for themselves and come to their own conclusions; in accordance with the freedom of scientific research, which the American constitution also guarantees. Popular referendums came out in support of this demand by an overwhelming majority, and yet the followers of (Darwin) still prevail! Organizations like the "American Atheists" organization, founded by the libertine (Madalyn O'Hair) in 1963, also legally pursue anyone who rebels against the gods of evolution from the academics, as well as the (National Academy of Sciences), which is predominantly atheist, and which we have seen models of its falsification of facts; in service of the myth. Entire institutions support the myth!
But... wait! Does all of this explain the spread of the myth in this way? My answer to your question is: Is it reasonable for the virus, which can only be seen with electronic microscopes, to spread in a human body and kill it? The answer: Yes; if the person has a weak immune system. And so the virus of the myth... spread in the body of the West, which was exhausted by the myths of the church, repulsed by it, and tired of its tyranny. (Darwin) built his imaginary glory on the failure of his opponent, on the saying: "The vermin on our land multiply." Just as corrupt systems derive their life from frightening their peoples with enemies whom they make people imagine are evil. And this was very clear in the episode: (The God of the Atheists' Gaps).
After all of this, brothers, we still have to answer the question that many have insisted on since the beginning of this series of episodes, and the answer to which was deliberately delayed, what is the question? Why does the theory of evolution presuppose a contradiction with Islam? Why don't we reconcile it with our religion, as some Westerners have reconciled it with their religion? This is what we will answer in a comprehensive and sufficient answer - God willing - in the next episode, and peace be upon you.