← Back to The Journey of Certainty
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Peace be upon you.
I published an episode in which I responded to "O Fortunate Coincidences" by Dihye. I noticed in the comments that many of his followers defended him, saying, "No, do not wrong Dihye. He is just a transmitter of sciences and theories. He can be right or wrong, but he does not intend to spread atheism. You cannot judge based on one episode alone."
Although Dihye's approach was completely clear in that episode, I reviewed and followed many of his episodes and found that most of them promote atheism under the guise of science and materialism. In this episode, I will present you with ten examples from Dihye's episodes.
By the way, I am not Egyptian, but I am very keen to simplify the speech in this episode so that language is not a barrier. I love and cherish my brothers from Egypt and elsewhere, with whom I am united by the bond of faith.
Listen up, guys, so you can understand where people like Al-Dahhi are going and comprehend the full picture; we'll start with a highly important introduction that we won't skip. We've shown in "Journey of Certainty" that we believe in Allah through reason, innate disposition, and experimental sciences.
Atheism begins with insisting on a predetermined result; the denial of Allah's existence, as we've explained in "The Captive." However, atheism doesn't admit this; because it would appear as a denier and insistent on the predetermined result, not neutral or scientific. So, atheism hides behind the veil of purely materialistic interpretation of existence, claiming that it doesn't acknowledge anything called the unseen, but only material things.
But when atheism insists on contradicting the evidence of innate disposition, reason, and true experimental science, and excludes the existence of the Creator, the universe and life become inexplicable to it, all of it gaps. Atheism comes to fill these gaps... how does it fill them? With interpretations that are, in reality, supernatural interpretations, but they are foolish, as we've explained in the previous episode.
Alright, since you've resorted to the unseen - O atheism - in the end, why don't you acknowledge the existence of the Creator; the true unseen that all evidence points to, instead of your foolish unseen? No, neither the Creator nor anything. And so that atheism doesn't appear bigoted, it hides behind "experimental science," and when you examine its evidence, you find that it's either pseudoscience or real science that points to Allah, but atheism reverses its indication to make it evidence for the denial of Allah's existence.
The episodes you've followed with Al-Dahhi revolve around these methods. And for those who follow with us "Journey of Certainty," this episode will be a practical exercise on Al-Dahhi's style, after we've discussed the style of (Adnan Ibrahim); so you know how to listen critically.
Al-Dahhi denied the precise intention of the universe in the episode "O Beauties of Coincidence," and replaced it with the idea of multiple universes, a foolish assumed unseen as we've explained in the previous episode. Then, Al-Dahhi attributed the creation of man to random evolution, then denied the precise design in the human body using false evidence in all of this as we will see.
Then, he denied man's innate disposition by doubting the existence of a purpose in life, the tendency towards religion, intellectual necessities, the moral tendency, and free will. Then, he gave materialistic explanations for death and life, and claimed man's ability to resurrect the dead. Then, Al-Dahhi hinted that Allah is not a real existence, but rather a meaning that man invented.
And for those surprised by our saying that Al-Dahhi promotes atheism, beware, Al-Dahhi's method is different from someone like (Sharif Jaber) who tells you directly: "I want you to disbelieve"... No, Al-Dahhi doesn't talk about Islam directly, but he undermines the foundations on which Islam is built, such as innate disposition, belief in creation, and the soul. And he presents himself as speaking in science, so you don't feel that he's attacking your religion, but you start to doubt little by little.
And the sources of information that Al-Dahhi boasts about in all of this are the books of atheists. And for those who say: "Al-Dahhi brings sciences and theories and cites sources," do you not see that he only quotes from the books of atheists filled with false science and foolish unseen as we will see? Do you not see that he doesn't quote from respected research that shows these theories are empty talk? And even if Al-Dahhi brings real research, why does he use it to make false inferences to prove atheistic ideas?
Come on, let's look at them one by one, brothers.
We spoke about the precise order of the universe, and the skepticism of Al-Dahhi regarding it in the episode "Oh, the Wonders of Coincidence." Let's talk about living organisms. If these organisms do not have a Creator who created them intentionally, with knowledge and wisdom, how did living organisms come to be? Al-Dahhi responds in the episode "Dinosaur Shawarma" that it is evolution, of course.
It is strange that Al-Dahhi completely avoided mentioning Darwin's name, his book, or the theory of evolution throughout the episode. He says:
"A book from 1859... the important thing is the year 1859, one of the scientists, I don't know his name honestly, published a book, I don't know its name, it was talking about the origin of species... before us, this terrifying evidence from the fossils, which contains this awful mixture, which was predicted by the book from the year 1859."
Come on, Al-Dahhi, are you ashamed to confront your audience with these names or what? Anyway, do you have evidence, Al-Dahhi, for the accuracy of your statement about the evolution of organisms from one another? Al-Dahhi says: Of course, the fossil of Archaeopteryx represents a transitional stage between reptiles and birds, meaning it can be considered the first bird.
And Al-Dahhi says about dinosaurs:
"It is agreed upon by the scientific community that these are the ancestors of the ten thousand species of birds that exist today."
Of course, I had pointed out in the episode "Tarzan," and with papers from the most famous magazines such as Science and Nature, that this is not an agreement by the scientific community at all. I mentioned the research that refutes that Archaeopteryx is a transitional link with birds, but Al-Dahhi selects what he likes and claims consensus on it. Apart from the fact that I had pointed out in the episode "Who Stole the Million?" why the idea of transitional stages is, from its very basis, a highly comical and absurd idea.
In the same episode "Dinosaur Shawarma," Al-Dahhi provides another piece of evidence for evolution, especially the evolution of humans:
"When you want to see things called atavism, which are things that remain hidden in our DNA from the traces of our ancestors, you sometimes find children born with a tail."
So, we are animals with tails, and the evidence is the children who are born with tails. Of course, I had pointed out in the episode "The Tail You Don't Know Much About" that this is an old, very old lie started by Darwin in his book "The Descent of Man" based on external similarities, and that there are scientific studies by researchers, some of whom are followers of the theory of evolution in Nature and others, which have shown that what is called the human tail is actually growths and appendages of fatty tissue and fibers, with no bones or cartilage, meaning it has no relation to the animal's tail.
And these growths can appear in many places, for example, in the neck as in this paper in Nature, so what Al-Dahhi and its forms (tail) is a disease with scientific names: (Spinal dysraphism, bifida, lipoma) not a tail indicating animal origins, but Al-Dahhi uses any old superstitions (pseudoscience) and pretends that he is presenting neutral science with sources.
Okay, if humans came about by chance through evolution, Al-Dahhi, how do you explain the precise order, perfection, and precision in the human body? Al-Dahhi responds in the episode "Colors of Time": "No, who told you that the human body is perfect, it has flaws." Let's see:
"And then under the cornea, there is a lens that focuses light, so your eyes have evolved greatly over history, so your eyes - praise be to God - are flawed, meaning I hear someone saying: 'Oh, we have reached the pinnacle of miracle, the eyes of humans have become the best thing, the greatest thing.' I don't want to surprise you and tell you this story, but your eyes as humans have some flaws, how is that possible?!"
Of course, brothers, the lie that the human eye is flawed was promoted by the atheist writer whom Al-Dahhi cites in his episodes, Richard Dawkins, and we had responded to it in the episode "I Embarrassed You," in which we detailed the scientific research that the composition of the eye that they criticize is a necessity and a superior solution for utilizing the space of the eye, as in the journal Vision Research.
And that this composition exposes light to dozens of different types of cells before it reaches the retinal cells, which increases the strength and purity of vision, as in the research of the most famous journals PNAS, Nature, and others. Even the evolutionary site Phys.org states that the presence of sensitive cells in the back of the retina is a design feature, and that the claim that the eye would be better if the cells were at the front of the retina is folly.
Al-Dahhi ignores all scientific research and cites the nonsense of Richard Dawkins, which we have detailed examples of his lies and falsification of science in order to convince people that (there is no god).
Good morning - ya Dahhi - let's go beyond the human body, how do you explain the existence of human nature in it? What does (fitrah) mean? It means that when people are born, they have roots for the tendency of religiosity, resorting to the Almighty, and intellectual necessities, such as: the principle of causality, that every event has a cause, and a moral tendency: loving good and hating evil, and a feeling that our lives must have a purpose, which is called (teleology), and free will: that we do things or we don't, and we bear the responsibility for our choices. All of this is from human nature.
Human nature - ya brothers - creates a big dilemma for atheists; because its existence means the necessity of an external intervention, from an omniscient, omnipotent being, which cannot be explained by mere random biochemical interactions. Imagine a person saying: this computer device was formed by mere chance, its parts were assembled and coordinated without a maker, but a violent storm gathered it in this way. We opened the computer and found in it a complete, coordinated operating system, and programs each with a purpose, how do you explain the existence of these programs, O atheist? If we swallow your funny lie about the hardware, how do you explain the existence of the software on the device?
Abstract biological and chemical interactions, random mutations, and natural selection in the theory of evolution, if we assume that they can actually create a human being and instill life in him as well. These blind meanings, where do they get the ability to deposit in the human soul these consistent, directed natural components, in every new soul that is born?
Atheism here is completely lost, so some atheists look for material causes for these natural components, so we say to them: let us assume for the sake of argument, that you found genes for the tendency of religiosity, others for intellectual necessities, a third group for morality, and genes for the feeling of the purpose of life. This coordinated, directed package, which makes people believe in the existence of a creator, loving His worship, resorting to Him, possessing intellectual necessities such as causality, from which they infer His existence, and a moral tendency consistent with His commands, and a feeling of teleology, which drives them to seek His will and adhere to it?
If you actually found material causes for the natural components, it is nothing but another proof of the greatness of this creator, who deposited them in humans, and perfected them and made them consistent with His legal commands. Also, if the matter is a matter of genes and biochemical interactions, how do you explain the free will of man? Which is also from human nature. If it is matter and that's it, then man would be a puppet whose genes move him in a specific, predetermined direction, and he has no choice. And you won't say that there are genes that force you to be free in your choices?
Here, atheism has put its feet in the wall, and was forced to deny human nature, forced to deny the needs that people realize about themselves instinctively. By the way, I have spoken in detail about the crisis of atheism with human nature in episodes 3 to 12 of "Journey of Certainty" if you follow them, you will see the scientific responses, and you will understand completely the atheist and the forms of his opinion going to us where.
You will find the atheist in his episodes presenting an atheistic presentation with each one of the components of human nature that we have spoken about: teleology: meaning the feeling of the existence of a purpose, a goal in life, the tendency of religiosity, intellectual necessities, the moral tendency, and free will.
As for the existence of a purpose in life, a clip has spread of someone asking the atheist about the purpose of life, and wants advice from him for the youth. The atheist's answer was shocking to the point that those deceived by him say that he was joking, meaning he was joking, but when you see him arguing with certain writers; to prove to you his answer, and does not change his words afterwards, and when you see that his answer is consistent with his materialistic view and atheistic presentation, you will know that he was not joking.
The question was...
The questioner: A question, we want you to give a message to the youth who have no purpose in life. The atheist: So what's the problem? Is life without a purpose that you are not satisfied with... The questioner: No, you have many goals. The atheist: This is by Albert Camus and Sartre in their existential books that assume that there is no meaning to life. Questioner: No, of course there is a meaning to life, man on the surface of the earth has requirements and for example certain goals. The atheist: So what are all the goals we want to eat and drink and reproduce.
Eat and drink and reproduce!! ﴿And they say, "There is not but our worldly life; we die and live, and we will not be resurrected.﴾ [Ghaafir: 24]. He says to you: life without a purpose means there is no place for the saying of the Almighty: ﴿And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me.﴾ [Al-Dhariyat: 56] nor for the cultivation of the earth with what pleases Allah, nor for entering Paradise and salvation from the Fire. And there are still people who doubt that the atheist is spreading atheism, nihilism, and absurdity!
As for the tendency of religiosity, it is enough for you to see his episode "A believer on Mars" to see the belittling of religion and religiosity. Nevertheless, the atheist does not talk much about religiosity, but rather speaks about matters, in which there is a clear saying. Nevertheless, the atheist comes up with statements contrary to the fact that it is science, as if revelation has no value.
And unfortunately, you see some people commenting that "my brother, why do they have to bring religion into everything?" And these people do not understand the relationship between the sources of knowledge from reason, human nature, true experience such as revelation, and experimental science. Revelation is knowledge, the verses and the authentic hadiths are knowledge, and they cannot contradict true science. From revelation, there is what is absolutely indicative, its interpretation is completely clear, so if it contradicts experimental science, then this science must be false, as I have shown a lot in "Journey of Certainty".
And if we think that there is a contradiction between experimental science - true experimental science - and revelation, then the defect may be in our understanding of revelation itself, and all this reconciliation between revelation and science has rules and principles. As for saying that religion should not be brought into science, this is extreme ignorance and those who say this need to urgently review the episode "The Captive".
As for intellectual necessities, these are the foundations upon which both religious and worldly knowledge are built. For example: the relationship of causality; every happening thing has a cause, and thus the universe and mankind must have a cause for their existence. Sciences are based on observing causal relationships. In the episode "The Cause," Al-Dahhi doubts causality from its very foundation and mentions the view of David Hume, who doubts the existence of a causal relationship between things. Someone might say, "Brother, he is presenting David Hume's words and does not necessarily endorse them." Once again, what is the benefit of presenting atheistic arguments without refuting them?
As for the moral inclination, in the episode "Children's Morality," Al-Dahhi acknowledges that we have a moral inclination to love justice and hate injustice, but he doubts its validity and fairness; because he claims - according to the alleged research - that this moral inclination is only directed towards those who are like us, meaning it is biased "Biased."
Al-Dahhi says:
"In summary, as far as I understand from these studies, these studies tell us that we are somehow born with rigid morals in our brains that we come into this world with certain morals, some of which are very good and very noble, but these good and noble things usually go to those who are like us. We love those who are like us, and we are ready to accept injustice and obstruction for those who are not like us and are different from us."
Pay attention, Al-Dahhi is not talking about the fact that one of us gets used to those who are like him more, nor is he talking about the corruption of some of our morals as we grow up and our moral standards change so that we accept injustice. No, he is trying to convince you that moral standards are fundamentally flawed, biased from the beginning. What does this mean? This statement has two dangerous consequences:
First: that the existence of these morals does not indicate a Creator. I have explained - brothers - how the existence of morals in our nature is one of the evidence for the existence of a Creator who instills good and justice in people and detests evil and injustice for them. But according to Al-Dahhi, these morals are biased so that we accept injustice and evil for those who are different from us simply because they are different from us. Therefore, this moral inclination is neither just nor wise, so it is not evidence of a wise Creator, nor is there a need for evidence that it is relative and biased.
The second dangerous consequence: that these morals cannot be relied upon; because they are not absolute truth, but rather relative and biased. Yes, pay attention, Al-Dahhi says this at the end of an episode in which he began with the following question:
"If we took a child and left him on an island until he grew up and returned to us, what would he say? What actions would upset him? Would he accept injustice? Would he accept harm? Would he betray? Would he respect his father and mother? Would he love homosexuals? These are all very important questions, would he love homosexuals?"
"Would he love homosexuals?" Ah, so you, Al-Dahhi, want us to understand that if we do not love homosexuals, it is simply because they are not like us and are different from us, not because perversion is something evil or anything. So we accept injustice and obstruction for them, and prevent them from practicing their perversion. Of course, his words will be refuted when we see how Al-Dahhi denies free will. Therefore, according to Al-Dahhi, the pervert is a person forced to commit perverted acts.
According to Al-Dahhi, morals are not real absolute values, there is no right and wrong, but when Al-Dahhi came to define evil, he defined it as follows:
"It is possible that one day we can treat evil, we can treat any trait that society rejects."
Of course, this is a definition subject to change, and homosexuality, meaning perversion, is not rejected in many societies, so it is not necessarily evil - according to Al-Dahhi. This is of course in addition to Al-Dahhi talking in the episode "Documentary Film" about the benefits of pornographic films, and how they have brought the world together. And he says about porn, meaning sexual images:
"Dear viewer, porn is what was behind the cables and the basic infrastructure that created the Internet, the Internet that is at least said today that it has opened many people's homes."
And Al-Dahhi attributes the credit to pornographic images for the spread of printing and microfilm, and I will not be surprised if Al-Dahhi starts openly promoting sexual perversion, after paving the way for it with the episode "He, She, and Identity Circles," and your rejection of perversion will be considered injustice and obstruction for them; because they are simply different from you - according to Al-Dahhi - not because perversion in itself is an evil thing.
Well, on what basis did Al-Dahhi build all this? On the experiments of Paul Bloom. Who is Paul Bloom?
"Here comes the role of the famous psychologist Paul Bloom, who has been featured in 500 episodes before, but I honestly love this man, his lectures are a little bit great, they are available for free on the net."
Paul Bloom is an atheist author of the article (Is God an Accident?) in which he says that general religious propositions are produced by chance as a byproduct of our cognitive systems and represents atheists in debates. He is Paul Bloom whom Al-Dahhi loves and refers you to his free lectures on the net. So, Paul Bloom is not a child or on an island, but an atheist who wants to find an atheistic explanation for morals.
Well, even if he is an atheist, does this affect the truth and honesty of his research? No, if you believe this, then you are in dire need to attend the episode "Falsifying Science, Perversion as an Example"; so that you know that this neutrality in the field of research that is employed ideologically is just a ridiculous myth.
Of course, in addition to the fallacy of reasoning with the experiment (Bloom):
"The surprise was that the beautiful, pure children we saw before, who know how to distinguish between injustice and justice, chose and cried for those who obstructed the opening of different types of chocolate."
The children chose the robot that obstructed the opening of different types of chocolate from the type they love, Al-Dahhi goes to build on this experiment - whose validity God knows for an atheist like Bloom - builds dangerous results like the ones we saw, and makes the youth feel that he is promoting science.
Peace be upon you.
So, Al-Dahhi dealt with the previous four natural components in the ways we mentioned and got used to in the atheistic presentation. Now, number 5 (free will) is what Al-Dahhi focused on the most; because it is one of the things that bother atheists the most and shows the absurdity of their claims.
If man is just matter governed by biological, chemical laws, and some electricity in the nerve cells, then we are nothing but robots programmed to do certain acts without choice. How do you explain the existence of free will, oh atheism?! This is a fact that no one can deny, man chooses in his actions, he buys or does not buy, he speaks or does not speak, he writes or does not write.
When the priest of atheism, Richard Dawkins, was asked if there is any material, evolutionary explanation for free will, he answered as follows:
"I don't think there is a scientific explanation for free will." (I do not think there is a scientific explanation for free will).
Yet, atheists chose to laugh at themselves and convince people of the opposite of what they actually know about free will, and they falsified research for that or distorted its meaning. And Al-Dahhi's job is to repeat their words in Arabic.
"The most important question is, is this what the genes want? Of course, someone will ask me, what do the genes have to do with it? This is what I want in his book (The Selfish Gene) the famous biologist (Richard Dawkins)..."
So, it is funny to imagine that you have the freedom of choice and Al-Dahhi goes to convince you with the book (The Selfish Gene) by the priest of atheism Dawkins who admitted himself that free will is a dilemma. Brother Reda Zidan published a book in which there is a scientific criticism of the myth of the selfish gene and an explanation of its dirty moral consequences. And the biological society talks about the selfish gene with contempt as in this interview with Professor Edward Wilson "Edward Wilson" refers (Wilson) to his paper published in (Nature). Yet, Al-Dahhi still cites the selfish gene.
Al-Dahhi imitates the atheists even in the pictures they use, so when the atheist Sam Harris "Sam Harris" writes a book (Free Will) and says at the beginning: "Free will is an illusion" and describes man in it as "Biochemical Puppet" meaning a biological chemical puppet, Al-Dahhi goes in the episode "Controlling the Brain" and repeats the same words and even uses the same idea of the cover of Sam Harris's book.
And he says in the episode:
"In the end, the current impression among scientists is that your movements, memories, feelings, emotions, and imagination are just some electricity, chemistry, and nerve cells... Why can't we control our brains? Why can't we control our addictions? Why can't we control our emotions? And when I say these things, why can't it be him who controls us?"
"Can't we control our addictions, our brain is the one that controls us". In the episode "The Atheist's Text" Al-Dahhi says:
"Meaning, with questions like this, we go back to one of the most important intellectual dilemmas in history, is man controlled and not free? And in this case, he cannot be controlled, but in this case, the left text makes a good story to make him understand that he is free after he takes the decision".
Meaning, part of your right brain can force you to do something, then the left text fabricates a story to convince you that you are free and you are not free. Of course, brothers, atheists focus on denying free will not only to get rid of the dilemma of nature, but also to justify all moral vices such as sexual deviation, but their call also produces a justification for crime.
In the episode "The Rapist", Al-Dahhi says:
"The biological aspect is very important in the making of the rapist, genes, hormones, changes in the brain".
And in the same episode:
"A group of discoveries like this, as much as they are terrifying in making us look at man as a living being, who has genes that play with nature, both of his choices are limited".
Meaning, your genes - your genetic material - you do not control them, and the environment nature you do not control it, and the two of them are the ones that control you and therefore you are controlled and not free. And in the episode "Controlling the Brain" he says:
"We only change certain electricity in the brain and make certain people accept injustice".
In the episode "Free or Free" Al-Dahhi attributes child molestation to inflammation in a brain area, and says:
"A story like this, if you think about it, is terrifying, it shows that simple changes in the brain can change our desires, tendencies, behaviors, and change our ability to control these things".
Of course, Al-Dahhi will present it in a way of understanding this category of people and trying to help them instead of taking revenge on them with punishments. Is this the message that reaches the youth? Or the normalization of vices under the pretext that we are forced?! And for whose benefit is this? For the benefit of whom it is spread in Muslim societies that man is forced to commit moral vices and crimes. And of course, the youth who are convinced by Al-Dahhi's words will have a psychological complex, why would God hold me accountable for my actions if I am controlled?
Peace be upon you, we have finished discussing the atheist Dahhih's argument regarding innate disposition. Now, let's talk about divine actions, such as resurrecting the dead, as mentioned in the Quran: "When Abraham said, 'My Lord is He who gives life and causes death...'" [The Cow: 258]. The Dahhih says, "No, we also give life and cause death." In the episode "Resurrecting the Dead," the Dahhih claims that science is approaching the resurrection of the dead:
"I want you to raise your ambitions as well. Why not give life to the dead?"
How so, Dahhih? He says:
"DNA contains all the information about you, all the information about you, all the traits present in you are present in your DNA."
Pay attention to "all the information" and "all the traits." He says, therefore, if we take the DNA from dead people whose cells are frozen, and we sequence them into stem cells, and place the cells in a woman's womb, it will produce a child identical copy. It is possible to produce a copy of Einstein, for example.
Firstly, although this talk is completely empty; because even if it is done, it is not called resurrection of the dead. And although the Dahhih uses the same metaphor of the king who said to Ibrahim - peace be upon him - "My Lord is He who gives life and causes death. He said, 'I give life and cause death.' Ibrahim said, 'Then Allah brings the sun from the east, so bring it from the west.' Then the disbeliever was confounded. And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people."
With all of this, the basic information from which the Dahhih started is false, that your DNA contains all the information about you, and all the traits present in you, including moral, psychological, personality, and intelligence traits. As for obvious observations, it is known that Siamese twins have exactly the same DNA, and many of them are born in the same circumstances, yet their personalities often differ greatly.
As for scientific explanation: through the science of Epigenetics, we have been able to understand that the same DNA strand can be read in different ways, and different things can result from it. More importantly, the presence of a certain gene for a certain behavioral trait is a matter refuted by modern genetics, as in this study published in the journal Nature in 2008, which shows that even general simple physical traits have been found after the genetic code was cracked, it is not possible to limit them to a certain gene, or even a certain group of genes. How about behavioral traits that are much more complex than physical ones?
Your behavioral traits are affected by DNA, by epigenetics, and by the environment, and all of this is a body, and you are not just a body, you have a soul, and you have a spirit, and this is what atheism and materialism try to deny. As for the episode "Why Do We Die," the Dahhih mocks the idea that there is an angel of death under the guise of mocking death and builds the entire episode on the myth of Dawkins' selfish gene. Of course, without you feeling it, the need for something called a soul is denied, and the true mystery that is the soul is replaced by the myth of the selfish gene.
And I will end with a final example of the Dahhih's promotion of atheism in the episode "The Trade of Ideas." The Dahhih says:
"This is what distinguishes humanity, that it can invent ideas that do not have an objective existence that we can touch and play with, and over time, it can develop these ideas and increase their complexity. Important ideas that facilitate cooperation among us, such as: money, the state, the law, and nationalism. Although they derive their value from us, they affect us."
So, ideas that do not have a real existence, ideas that derive their value from us. Maybe, Dahhih, if I want to know more about these ideas, who should I read? The Dahhih says:
"In his book (Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow), the author Yuval Noah Harari uses these experiences and stories to ask the question, what is the difference between us as humans and the rest of the animals?"
And the Dahhih tells you Harari's answer to the question:
"So, are humans the only ones who can cooperate with each other in this way, unlike the rest of the animals? I say; because man is the only creature that can invent ideas."
Come on, let's see (Harari) of the Dahhih, what do you mean, (Harari), by the ideas that man invents? Come on, let's listen to (Harari) the atheist Israeli writer:
"God is a product of the human imagination."
In his episode, the Dahhih mentioned everything that (Harari) mentioned except God, Heaven, and Hell. The Dahhih spoke about the principle that man invents ideas that do not have a real existence, and he referred you to a book and an author who consider God, Heaven, and Hell to be among these ideas.
These are the scientists that the Dahhih relies on, (Harari) who predicts the possibility that the rich may become gods in the future, and the poor may become people of no value. And (Dawkins) who I have shown examples of his atheist charlatanism. And (Sartre) and (Camus) who say that life has no purpose. And (Paul Bloom) who represents the atheist side in debates, and whom the Dahhih says: "But honestly, I love this man." These are the Dahhih's friends. And think that the Dahhih says: "Our noble feelings go to those who are like us." So, it is not possible that, Dahhih, you love a state because they are like you, and you are like them as well.
Peace be upon you. This is what I have observed in the episodes of Al-Dahiy that I have watched. Every single one of them - without exception - contains issues, and most of them focus on atheistic concepts disguised as materialism. And Allah knows best what is in the many other episodes that I have not watched.
To the youth who objected to me last time and said, "No, Al-Dahiy does not promote atheism," honestly, if you have watched the mentioned episodes of Al-Dahiy, or some of them, and do not see any atheistic call in them, then I think our talk today should make you reconsider. Do you understand your religion well? Do you have sufficient intellectual immunity? Have you seen in Al-Dahiy's episodes an episode that exposes the lies of atheists and builds faith on a scientific basis?
I have noticed that when Al-Dahiy addresses religion, he does so with a kind of mockery, as in the episode "A Believer on Mars":
"If you please, we want to franchise the Holy Mosque in Mars for you, what's the problem? The franchise right, we won't be against development, meaning if you don't perform Hajj, you can take a franchise of Arafat and Muzdalifa, this is a business that will never perish."
"Allah will not let to waste the reward of the doers of good" [Yaseen: 12]. "This is a business that will never perish." No, he does not mean to mock the verse, he does not mean that! Okay, on the other hand, have you seen an episode of his where he argues with a verse, or mentions it as a means of glorification?
I wonder, does Al-Dahiy deliberately promote false science, or does he not know? What exactly does Al-Dahiy believe? That is not our concern, the important thing is to clarify that what he promotes is atheism and superstitions.
In conclusion, Al-Dahiy's episodes and his atheistic views are broadcast on the AJ+ channel, which is part of the Al Jazeera network, and which broadcast - months ago - a documentary (In Seven Years) which was a normalization with atheism as we have shown. Of course, we are not yet talking about the other programs that are shown on AJ+ which contain mockery of Islamic rituals, under the guise of comedy and criticism of reality.
The same country opens a channel (Al-Arabi Al-Jadid) under the supervision of Azmi Bishara, and the channel starts from the beginning by attacking the righteous caliphs and putting all the groups of Islam under suspicion. And these channels - unfortunately - are funded by the wealth of Muslims. Nations usually exploit their wealth to promote their principles, ideas, and religions, and the Islamic nation's wealth in the hands of the richest countries is exploited to destroy religion, spread atheism, and turn the youth into monsters without a goal or ideology or creed, and these countries compete in this process, and there is no power except with Allah.
We want, dear brothers, practical steps: First: Your friends, your children who have watched Al-Dahiy's episodes, I hope you make them watch this episode and the previous one (The Response to Al-Dahiy). Second: We spread this video in the appropriate places on the internet; so that we may open people's eyes. Third: I invite you to follow the episodes of (Journey of Certainty) which aims to address the mind and the innate disposition with a scientific language, and build faith on strong, fortified foundations.
And remember, dear ones, "And Allah has full control over His affairs, but most people do not know" [Yusuf: 21]. I ask Allah to use me and you in defending His religion and exposing deception.
Peace be upon you. This is what I have observed in the episodes of Al-Dahhiq that I have watched. Every single one of them, without exception, contains issues, and most of them focus on atheistic concepts disguised as materialism. God knows what is in the many other episodes that I have not watched.
To the youth who objected to me last time and said, "No, Al-Dahhiq does not promote atheism." Honestly, young people, if you have watched the mentioned episodes of Al-Dahhiq, or some of them, and do not see an atheistic call in them, then I think our talk today should make you reconsider. Do you understand your religion well? Do you have sufficient intellectual immunity? Have you seen in Al-Dahhiq's episodes an exposure of atheists' lies and building of faith on a scientific basis?
I have noticed that when Al-Dahhiq addresses religion, he does so with a kind of mockery, as in the episode "A Believer on Mars":
"He says, if you please, we want to franchise the Holy Mosque in Mars for you, what's the problem? The franchise right, we won't be against progress, meaning if you don't perform Hajj, you can take a franchise of Arafat and Muzdalifah, this is a business that will never fail."
"Allah will not suffer your deeds to be lost" [35:29]. "This is a business that will never fail." No, he does not mean to mock the verse, he does not mean that! Okay, on the other hand, have you seen an episode of his where he argues with a verse, or mentions it as a means of glorification?
I wonder, does Al-Dahhiq deliberately spread false science, or does he not know? What exactly does Al-Dahhiq believe? That is not our concern; the important thing is to show that what he spreads is atheism and superstitions.
In conclusion, Al-Dahhiq's episodes and his atheistic views are broadcast on the AJ+ channel, which is part of the Al-Jazeera network, and which broadcast - months ago - a documentary (In Seven Years) which normalized atheism as we have shown. Of course, we are not yet talking about the other programs that are shown on AJ+ which mock Islamic rituals under the guise of comedy and criticize reality.
The same country opens a channel (Al-Arabi Al-Jadid) under the supervision of Azmi Bishara, and the channel starts from the beginning by attacking the righteous caliphs and putting all Islamic groups under suspicion. These channels - unfortunately - are funded by the wealth of Muslims. Nations usually exploit their wealth to promote their principles, ideas, and religions, and the Islamic nation's wealth in the hands of the richest countries is exploited to destroy religion, spread atheism, and turn youth into monsters without a goal, purpose, or creed, and these countries compete in this process, and there is no power except in Allah.
We want, dear brothers, practical steps: First: Your friends, your children who have watched Al-Dahhiq's episodes, I hope you make them watch this episode and the previous one (the response to Al-Dahhiq). Second: We spread this video in the appropriate places on the internet; so that we may open people's eyes. Third: I invite you to follow the episodes of (Journey of Certainty) which aims to address the mind and innate disposition with a scientific language, and build faith on strong, fortified foundations.
And remember, dear ones, "And Allah has full power and control over His affairs, but most people do not know" [12:21]. I ask Allah to use me and you in defending His religion and exposing deception.
Peace be upon you. This is what I have observed in the episodes of Al-Dahiy that I have watched. Every single one of them, without exception, contains issues, and most of them focus on atheistic concepts disguised as materialism. God knows best what is in the many other episodes that I have not watched.
To the young people who objected to me last time and said, "No, Al-Dahiy does not promote atheism," frankly, if you have watched the mentioned episodes of Al-Dahiy, or some of them, and do not see an atheistic call in them, then I think our talk today should make you reconsider. Do you understand your religion well? Do you have sufficient intellectual immunity? Have you seen in Al-Dahiy's episodes an episode exposing the lies of atheists and building faith on a scientific basis?
I have not noticed that when Al-Dahiy addresses religion, he does so with a kind of mockery, as in the episode "A Believer on Mars":
"He says, if you please, we want to franchise the Makkan sanctuary on Mars for you, what's the problem? The franchise right, we won't be against progress, and if you don't perform Hajj, you can take a franchise of Arafat and Muzdalifa, this is a business that will not perish."
"Allah has promised, to those of you who believe and do good deeds, that He will surely make you successors in the earth, as He made those before you successors; and He has surely established for you your religion which He has enjoined upon you; never to change it. This is My bounty which I bestow upon whomever I will, and My bounty is infinite." [Faatir: 29]. "This is a business that will not perish." No, he does not mean to mock the verse, he does not mean that! Okay, on the other hand, have you seen an episode of his in which he argues with a verse, or mentions it as a means of glorification?
I wonder, does Al-Dahiy deliberately spread false science, or does he not know? What does Al-Dahiy believe exactly? This is not what matters; what matters is that we clarify that what he spreads is atheism and superstitions.
In conclusion, Al-Dahiy's episodes and his atheistic views are broadcast on the AJ+ channel, which is part of the Al-Jazeera package, and which broadcast - months ago - a documentary (In Seven Years) which was a normalization with atheism as we have shown. Of course, we are not yet talking about the other programs that are shown on AJ+ which contain mockery of Islamic rituals, under the guise of comedy and criticism of reality.
The same country opens a channel (Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed) under the supervision of Azmi Bishara, and the channel starts from the beginning by attacking the righteous caliphs, and putting all Islamic groups under suspicion. These channels - unfortunately - are funded by the wealth of Muslims. Nations usually exploit their wealth to promote their principles, ideas, and religions, and the Islamic nation's wealth in the hands of the richest countries is exploited to destroy religion, spread atheism, and turn the youth into monsters without a goal or ideology, and these countries compete in this process, and there is no power except with Allah.
We want, dear brothers, practical steps: First: Your friends, your children who have watched Al-Dahiy's episodes, I wish you would make them watch this episode and the previous one (the response to Al-Dahiy). Second: We spread this video in the appropriate places on the internet; so that we may open people's eyes. Third: I invite you to follow the episodes of (Journey of Certainty) whose goal is to address the mind, and the innate disposition with an actual scientific language, and build faith on strong, fortified foundations.
And remember, dear ones, "And Allah has full power and control over His affairs, but most of the people do not know." [Yusuf: 21]. I ask Allah to use me and you in defending His religion and exposing deception.
Peace be upon you. This is what I have seen in the episodes of Ad-Dahiy that I have followed. Every single one of them - without exception - has a problem, and most of them focus on atheistic concepts disguised as materialism. God knows what is in the many other episodes that I have not followed.
And I am telling the youth who objected to me last time, and said: "No, Ad-Dahiy does not promote atheism." Honestly, young people, if you have followed the mentioned episodes of Ad-Dahiy, or some of them, and you do not see any atheistic call in them, then I think our talk today must make you reconsider. Do you understand your religion well? Do you have sufficient intellectual immunity? Have you seen in Ad-Dahiy's episodes an episode that exposes the lies of atheists and builds faith on a scientific basis?
I have not noticed that Ad-Dahiy, when he addresses religion, does so with a kind of mockery, as in the episode "A Believer on Mars":
"If you don't mind, we want to franchise the Makkan sanctuary on Mars for you. What's the problem? The franchise right, we won't be against progress. And if you don't perform Hajj, you can get a franchise of Arafat and Muzdalifa. This is a business that will never fail."
"Allah has promised those who have believed among the Children of Israel and have followed the disbelievers, the Fire, wherein they will abide eternally. That is because they took the disbelievers as allies rather than the believers. And who is more unjust than one who conceals a testimony he has been given from Allah? And Allah is not unaware of what you do." [Surah Al-Baqarah: 2:85]. "This is a business that will never fail." No, he does not mean to mock the verse, he does not mean that! Okay, on the other hand, have you seen an episode of his in which he argues with a verse, or mentions it as a means of glorification?
I wonder, does Ad-Dahiy deliberately promote false science, or does he not know? What does Ad-Dahiy actually believe? That is not our concern; the important thing is to show that what he promotes is atheism and superstitions.
In conclusion, Ad-Dahiy's episodes and his atheistic views are broadcast on the AJ+ channel, which is part of the Al Jazeera package, and which broadcast - months ago - a documentary (In Seven Years) which was a normalization with atheism as we have shown. Of course, we are not yet talking about the other programs that are shown on AJ+ which mock Islamic rituals under the guise of comedy and criticism of reality.
The same country opens a channel (Al-Arabi Al-Jadid) under the supervision of Azmi Bishara, and the channel starts from the beginning by attacking the righteous caliphs and putting all Islamic groups under suspicion. And these channels - unfortunately - are funded by the wealth of Muslims. Nations usually exploit their wealth to promote their principles, ideas, and religions, and the Islamic nation's wealth in the hands of the richest countries is exploited to destroy religion, spread atheism, and turn the youth into monsters without a goal, purpose, or creed, and these countries compete in this process, and there is no power except in Allah.
We want, brothers, practical steps: First: Your friends, your children who have followed Ad-Dahiy's episodes, I wish you would make them watch this episode and the previous one (The Response to Ad-Dahiy). Second: We spread this video in the appropriate places on the internet; so that we may open people's eyes. Third: I invite you to follow the episodes of (Journey of Certainty) whose goal is to address the mind and the innate disposition with a scientific language, and build faith on strong, fortified foundations.
And remember, beloved, "And Allah is the best of planners" [Surah Al-Imran: 3:54]. I ask Allah to use me and you in defending His religion and exposing deception.
Peace be upon you. This is what I have observed in the episodes of Al-Dahiy that I have watched. Every single episode - without exception - contains issues, and most of them focus on atheistic concepts disguised as materialism. God knows best what is in the many other episodes that I have not watched.
To the youth who objected to me last time and said, "No, Al-Dahiy does not promote atheism." Honestly, young people, if you have watched the mentioned episodes of Al-Dahiy, or some of them, and do not see any atheistic call in them, then I think our talk today should make you reconsider. Do you understand your religion well? Do you have sufficient intellectual immunity? Have you seen in Al-Dahiy's episodes an episode that exposes the lies of atheists and builds faith on a scientific basis?
I have noticed that when Al-Dahiy addresses religion, he does so with a kind of mockery, as in the episode "A Believer on Mars":
"If you please, we want to franchise the Holy Mosque in Mars for you, what's the problem? The franchise right, we won't be against progress, meaning if you don't perform Hajj, you can take a franchise of Arafat and Muzdalifah, this is a business that will never fail."
"﴿إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَتْلُونَ كِتَابَ اللَّـهِ وَأَقَامُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَأَنفَقُوا مِمَّا رَزَقْنَاهُمْ سِرًّا وَعَلَانِيَةً يَرْجُونَ تِجَارَةً لَّن تَبُورَ﴾ [Faatir:29]." "This is a business that will never fail." No, he does not mean to mock the verse, he does not mean that! Okay, on the other hand, have you seen an episode of his where he uses a verse as evidence, or mentions it as a means of glorification?
I wonder, does Al-Dahiy deliberately promote false science, or does he not know? What exactly does Al-Dahiy believe? This is not what matters; what matters is that we clarify that what he promotes is atheism and superstitions.
In conclusion, Al-Dahiy's episodes and his atheistic views are broadcast on the AJ+ channel, which is part of the Al-Jazeera package, and which broadcast - months ago - a documentary (In Seven Years) which normalized atheism as we have shown. Of course, we are not yet talking about the other programs that are shown on AJ+ which contain mockery of Islamic rituals, under the guise of comedy and criticism of reality.
The same country opens the (Al-Arabi Al-Jadid) channel under the supervision of Azmi Bishara, and the channel starts from the beginning by attacking the Righteous Caliphs, and putting all Islamic groups under suspicion. These channels - unfortunately - are funded by the wealth of Muslims. Nations usually exploit their wealth to promote their principles, ideas, and religions, and the Islamic nation's wealth in the hands of the richest countries is exploited to destroy religion, spread atheism, and turn the youth into monsters without a goal, purpose, or creed, and these countries compete in this process, and there is no power except in God.
We want, dear brothers, practical steps: First: Your friends, your children who have watched Al-Dahiy's episodes, I hope you make them watch this episode and the previous one (the response to Al-Dahiy). Second: We spread this video in the appropriate places on the internet; so that we may open people's eyes. Third: I invite you to follow the episodes of (Journey of Certainty) whose goal is to address the mind and instinct with a scientific language, and build faith on strong, fortified foundations.
And remember, dear ones, "﴿وَاللَّـهُ غَالِبٌ عَلَىٰ أَمْرِهِ وَلَـٰكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ﴾ [Yusuf:21]." I ask God to use me and you in defending His religion and exposing deception.
Peace be upon you.