← Back to Videos
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon the seal of the prophets, the leader of the mujahideen, and the delight of the eyes of the monotheists, Muhammad ibn Abdullah, and upon his family and companions altogether. To proceed.
When the Pope of the Vatican read a text describing the beloved Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, as having come with nothing but evil and inhumanity, and that he commanded the spread of his religion by the sword, Muslims were outraged and insulted this dove, who is worthy of that. However, the problem is that most Muslims in their response denied the use of the sword by the Prophet, peace be upon him, in spreading Islam.
Of course, people agree on the validity of fighting for self-defense, but the discussion now is about offensive jihad. It is known that when Muslims have a state, they must offer Islam to the peoples to enter it. If they refuse, Muslims demand the jizya, which symbolizes the submission of these peoples to the dominance of Islam. If they refuse, Muslims fight them. This is the jihad that the enemies of Islam criticize, the offensive jihad. Indeed, this is the jihad that many Muslims find discomforting in their hearts.
One might say to himself, "Indeed, why encroach on the freedoms of others? Why does Islam not urge Muslims to live in their state in safety and leave others to also enjoy peace and security?" A Muslim may forget these questions, but they will leave a negative impact on his confidence in his religion.
And ask yourself, brother, if you were among your colleagues at work and the voice of the reciter came with verses like Allah's saying: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah nor the Last Day and do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and do not practice the religion of truth among the People of the Book until they pay the jizya willingly while they are humbled" [At-Tawbah: 29], or with the verse: "But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them" [An-Nisa: 89], how do you feel? Do you love these verses like other words of Allah, the Most High? Or perhaps your face will show before your colleagues and your hand will reach for your device to lower the volume?
It is not enough for Muslims to be angry at the words of the Christian dove of the Vatican, but one must be proud of every detail of their religion and have complete conviction, satisfaction, and submission of the heart to every Islamic ruling and every verse of the Book of Allah, the Most High. Allah, the Most High, said: "But no, by your Lord, they will not believe until they make you judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves; then they will not find within themselves discomfort from what you have judged and they will submit completely" [An-Nisa: 65].
Come with me, O one who wants to be proud of his religion, let us cooperate in these minutes to make this matter, the command of offensive jihad, beloved to our hearts from the commands of Allah, the Most High.
Someone might say, "So where is the Islamic state that can carry out offensive jihad today? And what is the benefit of raising this topic if its application is not possible at the present time?"
The answer is that regardless of the current situation, the Muslim must strive to ensure that there is no hatred in his heart for any ruling of the religion of Allah, the Most High, and that there is no doubt or aversion in his heart when he reads verses and hadiths of fighting. For hatred of what Allah has revealed is discouraging of action. Allah, the Most High, said: "That is because they hated what Allah has revealed, so He rendered their deeds fruitless" [Muhammad: 9]. And I have explained this in the series "Hating What Allah, the Most High, Has Revealed."
Then I want to clarify with this presentation the falsehood and deceit of the Christian dove of the Vatican and his likes who criticize the praised severity in Islam, and they have in their corrupted religion and history multiples of this severity, but with falsehood, injustice, and aggression.
I do not mean forcing people to convert to Islam, for it is {There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion} [Al-Baqarah: 256]. However, the intention is that peoples should submit to the Islamic state, whether by entering Islam or by paying the jizya and hearing the call to Islam in the subjugated lands.
There are many points to address this question. Our focus in these minutes is to illustrate the state in which humanity lives in the absence of Islam's dominance over peoples. Some imagine that the world lived in safety and harmony before Islam, but when Islam came and its people sought to impose its dominance on the earth through jihad of invitation, it disrupted the peace and disturbed the tranquility, plunging humanity into a whirlpool of bloodshed. Therefore, if the world today were to be free from jihad of invitation, it would return to happiness, peace, and harmony. This is the theory advocated by the defeated among the Muslims. It is, therefore, the theory of the "happy world," a world that is happy under religious and intellectual pluralism, where no one oppresses another and no one tries to impose the dominance of their religion on others.
Let us see models of the "happy world" that Islam disrupted its security. These models are taken from the Wikipedia website, the free global encyclopedia, translated from English. I quote from this encyclopedia for two reasons: First: it mentions the sources of its information. Second: those who provided this information are not Muslims, so no one can criticize the facts I will mention by claiming they are biased towards Muslims. Rather, the facts I will mention are taken from the result of searching Wikipedia for the phrase "Total Deaths," meaning "List of fatalities." It will take you to a page titled "List of wars and disasters by death toll," meaning "List of wars and disasters by total fatalities." Its authors are non-Muslims, and the page has no relation to defending Muslims or condemning them, but it is a historical documentation of the most bloody wars, massacres, and famines in human history. I advise you to refer to it completely because I will only summarize the most important events in it.
Let us see models of the world that would live in harmony and religious and intellectual pluralism were it not for the jihad of invitation that causes Islam to cause violence and rejection of the other, as these people say.
Of course, brothers, these numbers are the death tolls, but the disabled as a result of these wars, the wounded, the tortured, the prisoners, and the displaced are multiples of these numbers. To those who consider Islam a religion of bloodshed, we say to you: it is assumed that after the absence of the Islamic caliphate ruling by Islam and enforcing the duty of jihad of invitation, the twentieth century should have been free of such bloodshed and should have been a century of safety and peace because it was free of such a caliphate that enforced the duty of jihad of invitation. Yet, the twentieth century is as you have seen.
Thus, as we have seen, Muslims enjoy safety, and the world enjoys it with them if they abandon jihad of invitation and stop reciting the verses of fighting and narrating the hadiths of the sword.
Peace be upon you. Because they were not affected by the bloodshed of Islam and its exclusion of others, as they say.
I will conclude these models with models of human happiness in the fourth group, which are striking models.
To know the way they killed, refer for example to the book "American Indian Chronology" by the author Philip White, and how, for example, the state of Massachusetts would declare 40 pounds for whoever brought the scalp of a hostile red Indian over the age of 12, and 25 pounds for the scalp of a hostile red Indian over the age of 12, and 20 pounds for the scalp of a hostile red Indian under the age of 12. Of course, the definition of hostility from the indigenous people will be like the definition of hostiles from the people of occupied Palestine.
David Stannard in the aforementioned book quoted extensively from Bartolome de las Casas, and this Casas is a Spanish bishop who accompanied Columbus and recorded some images of the brutality practiced by the Christian invaders against the indigenous people. Among what Casas said: "It was a general rule among the Spaniards that they had to be harsh, not only harsh, but harsh beyond imagination, so that the harsh treatment of the Indians would not allow them to think that they were any of the Indians human, but this treatment would not leave them a moment to think at all."
The invaders would enter the villages and would not leave a child, a pregnant woman, or a woman without cutting open their stomachs and cutting their entrails as they cut sheep in the pen. They would bet on who would cut a man with a knife stab, cut off his head, or spill his intestines with a sword strike. They had various types of torture. Some would catch the living and cut off their hands so that they would appear as if they were hanging from their bodies and then say to them: "Go, carry the messages, go spread the news among those who fled to the forests." As for the lords of the Indians and the nobles, they were killed by making grills for them from the bars and placing their pieces on top of them, then tying these poor people to them and lighting a quiet fire under them so that they would die slowly amidst torture, pain, and moaning. Bartolome says: "I once saw four of these lords on the grill, and because they were screaming loudly, the Spanish police commissioner who was sleeping was disturbed by their screams, so they put pieces of wood in their throats to silence them." These quotes are collected from different places in the aforementioned book "American Holocaust."
This, while Bartolome was describing the killer and the Christian. Is it from the scene of the killer while slaughtering his victim or burning her or feeding her to the dogs? Or from the scene of the Catholic missionary who, with cold blood, you see him afraid that the victim would exhale her last breath before he would deign to baptize her, so he would run to her panting to baptize her after her body was roasted by fire or bathed in her blood or half of her intestines were eaten by the dogs? They were not humans, brothers. For Bartolome describes how the Christian invaders would tear the infant from his mother's breast and throw him to the hungry dogs in front of his mother's eyes, and if the child cried in captivity, they would tear him from his mother and hit his head against the walls or swing him in the air and throw him away. These are the gentle lambs that if the Muslims had not harmed them and had not provoked their sensitive feelings with the jihad of demand, they would not have transgressed against anyone, and everyone would live within their borders safely from each other.
Slavery by Christians: David Stannard mentioned in his book "American Holocaust" that the number of Africans who were killed during the process of enslavement and before reaching the lands of their enslavers to work as slaves is 30 to 60 million Africans, most of whom were in the beginning of their lives, children and youth. We have, if God wills, a stop with the topic of slavery practiced by the Christians to shed light on some painful events, and to know that some of these Africans were Muslims and sons of wealthy families and memorizers of the Quran like Omar bin Said.
Inquisition Courts: The third prominent manifestation of religious tolerance is the inquisition courts such as those experienced by the Muslims in Andalusia after they concluded the surrender treaty in Granada in the year 1492 AD. And in fact, I do not advise reading much about the inquisition because reading about it leaves a wound in the heart that is difficult to heal. Rather, I advise those who still believe in the theory of the "happy world" mentioned at the beginning to read about it. Let them then refer to the book "The Inquisition in Spain, Portugal, and Others" by Dr. Ali Mashhur. In short, if the Spaniards did what they did to the poor Indians, what do you think they did to the Muslims who had wars between them and the Spaniards before the fall of Andalusia, which filled their black hearts with hatred for the Muslims, especially if you know that the year Granada fell is the same year Columbus discovered America and the massacres against the Native Americans began, the year 1492 AD.
After this review of 21 of the bloodiest events in human history, come four surprises:
If we know that on the Wikipedia page mentioned, we do not find any of the events that devastated millions were carried out by the hands of Muslims, except for the Armenian massacres carried out by the Ottoman state. And regardless of the reasons and the credibility of the numbers mentioned, we know that there is no argument in what any of the Muslims do, but in the act of the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him or the act agreed upon by the Muslims. Nevertheless, Muslims, even with many of them being far from their religion, are the least bloody of nations.
This is the total number of casualties in the wars that took place during the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Among the disbelievers, there were 900 casualties, about two-thirds of whom were from the Banu Qurayza, whom the Prophet (peace be upon him) punished when they betrayed him during the Battle of the Trench. Among the Muslims, there were 326 martyrs, according to Al-Liwa' Ahmad Abd al-Wahhab in his book "The Sanctioned Wars in Religions" on page 44. This number is less than the casualties in what is known as the "Football War" between El Salvador and Honduras in South America in 1969 during the preparatory matches for the World Cup, where 1,000 civilians were killed and more than 300,000 were displaced in four days.
Of course, my brothers, here is a very important note: we should not measure the issue by the number of casualties, but by what they were killed for and whether they deserved to be killed or not. The conviction of the principle of jihad to impose the dominance of Islam is a result of the conviction that this religion is from Allah the Almighty, so it is not appropriate to discuss the validity of this jihad with those who do not accept the origin that Islam is from Allah the Almighty. Whoever believes in Islam believes that Allah the Almighty has the right to legislate for the spread of His religion and for His benefit whatever He wills of jihad and otherwise. And whoever does not believe, how can we discuss with him the validity of a method for spreading a religion that he considers null and void in the first place? But I mention these numbers to show that even if the debater says, "I want the language of numbers to prove that your Prophet was sent only as a mercy to the worlds," we say to him, "Here are the numbers speaking."
These are the massacres carried out by the Christians, which were done in the name of their religion, their corrupted religion, which they claim is, unlike Islam, a religion of love and peace. David Stannard mentioned in his book "American Holocaust" that the invading Spaniards were required to recite the following phrases to those they faced among the Native Americans. The phrase: "I acknowledge to you that with the help of God we will take you and your wives and children and enslave them, and therefore we will sell them according to what their Excellencies command, and we will take your belongings and subject you to all the harm and destruction that we can." This is what the Christian invaders were supposed to face the poor Indians with. Compare this speech with what the Muslim conquerors were doing.
Here are some texts from what they call the Holy Book to learn their motivations in their massacres and their methods of killing. The book that the Christians are held accountable to in Ezekiel Chapter 9, Verse 5 says: "Pass through the city after him; do not pity or spare them. Kill old and young men, maidens, children, and women, but do not come near anyone on whom is the mark. Begin at My sanctuary." So they began with the men and the elders who were in front of the house. And He said to them: "Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain. Defile the house, and fill the courts with the slain. Go out!" And they went out and killed in the city.
Then He says in Hosea Chapter 13, Verse 16: "Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword; their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped open." These are the motivations of the Spanish invaders and the Crusaders in ripping open the wombs of pregnant women and smashing the heads of children. "Their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped open."
Then they claim that the Lord said in Isaiah Chapter 13, Verse 16: "Their children shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be plundered, and their wives ravished." Look at the morality. And whoever wants more of these texts should refer to the tape of Sheikh Abdullah al-Mahdi titled "Thus Christianity Spread," which is the first tape in the series of responding to the Pope of Vatican, as it contains very valuable information.
Compare these texts with the saying of the Prophet (peace be upon him) in Sahih Muslim: "Fight in the way of Allah, those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not transgress, do not betray, do not mutilate, and do not kill a child or the monks."
Check the English Wikipedia website and type in the name Benedict in the following manner: "Benedict XVI" (B, A, N, E, D, I, C, T, X, V, I, meaning the sixteenth in Roman numerals). You will get complete information from its sources, Western sources, and in it there is a title talking about the appointment of this Benedict as a distinguished member of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1981 to 2005. Directly under the title is a phrase whose literal translation is: "On November 25, 1981, Pope John Paul II bestowed upon Ratzinger the distinguished title of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the Holy Office and known in history as the Inquisition, the Inquisition."
So, the current Pope of the Christians headed the Inquisition. This is like the head of an office known historically for the Inquisition. He does not hesitate to read a text describing the Prophet (peace be upon him) as cruel. But a more shocking truth than this will come shortly for you to know that these impostors attack Islam and describe it with what they are more deserving of than us.
If we know all of this, if we know that the corrupted religion of the Vatican Pope is the first to be described as bringing what is evil and inhuman, and that it spread by the sword, then why this lying and deception from him and his followers? Why the slander against Islam?
The answer is in His saying, the Almighty: {Or do they envy people for what Allah has given them of His bounty?} [An-Nisa: 54]. And in His saying, the Almighty: {Many of the People of the Scripture wish they could turn you away as disbelievers after you have believed, out of envy from themselves, [even] after the truth has become clear to them.} [Al-Baqarah: 109].
The German Federal Statistical Office announced that the decline in Germany's population cannot be stopped. The writer Deutsche Welle on 26/11 said that Germany is heading to become an Islamic state by 2050, that is, of course, through a study of the speed of growth of Muslims compared to Christians in Germany. Germany, from which the Vatican spoke its slanders.
On the website "catholic.org," which is the official website of the global Catholic Church, there is an article titled "Muslims of the world outnumber Catholics," and in it the following phrase: "Vittorio Formenti, head of the Vatican Statistics Office, announced on 4/1/2008 that for the first time in history we are no longer in the lead, as the Muslims have surpassed us."
No wonder, then, my brothers, that they are angry when they see the growth of Muslims in terms of offspring and the entry of Christians into Islam. If you say the percentage of Christians, then who practices the Pope and his men's deception? And whose money do they extort? And who will buy their worthless indulgences from them? And where do they get the beauties who come for purification and tattooing in various parts of the body to protect themselves from Satan, as they claim? And where do they get the children to practice their perversions and filth that one is ashamed to mention?
I ask you, my brother, to go back to the internet and type the following phrase in YouTube: "Vatican sexual crimes." A well-documented documentary film produced by the BBC will appear. Watch at least the first and second parts to know who these people are.
As for the worst scandals, I will not mention them out of modesty, but I will mention significant parts from the documentary: In one rural diocese, 26 priests violated the rights of more than 100 boys and girls with their rampant sexual behavior. In the film, there is a statement from an American report stating that 2,500 American Catholic priests, meaning followers of Benedict, are accused of bad practices with children.
The most bitter truth in the film is the decree of "Crime of Seduction" issued by the former Pope of the Vatican in 1962. Strangely, this written decree ordered the victim who was sexually abused to keep silent about what happened to him and not to tell anyone, and also ordered his parents to keep silent, otherwise the victim and his parents would be subjected to severe punishment and ecclesiastical deprivation. What about the criminal man of religion who violated the child's dignity? The church investigates him and hides him from the eyes of the local authorities. In fact, he was covered up, and in the best case, he was transferred to another church where he practiced his debauchery there.
In the film, there is an interview with a man who was in charge of implementing the decree of the crime of seduction in America, but he was disgusted by his work when he knew its reality and said: "We had a budget estimated at millions of dollars in 1996 for such cases." A budget allocated for the silence of criminal clergy who practice deviance and silencing the boys and girls whose dignity was violated and silencing their parents. That is, the matter has become a normal operation for which the Catholic Church has a special budget.
The surprise now is that according to the film, the person responsible for implementing the decree of the crime of seduction for 20 years is Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the current Pope Benedict. The Pope of the Vatican is the one who supervises the covering of his deviant clergy to practice their deviance and filth freely and covers them with a special budget. In 2001, Ratzinger issued an appendix to the decision, which is just a confirmation of the decision of the crime of seduction, in addition to secrecy and ecclesiastical deprivation and threatening the victim, he added an addition: "The law of the exclusive jurisdiction of the Vatican." That is, all cases of child rape must go to the Vatican only, and a copy was sent to every bishop in the world. This man, who should be treated like a leprous sheep, is the one who is received with pomp in the lands of the Muslims, and there is no power except in Allah.
Moreover, last Thursday, 26/5/1430 AH corresponding to 21/05/2009 AD, Al Jazeera published a news item titled "Accusations of Priests of Sexual Assaults on Orphans in Ireland," which stated: "The investigation committee said that sexual abuse was an endemic problem in boys' schools run by the clergy. The report described sexual abuse of children at Artan Industrial School in the suburbs of Dublin and Letterfrack School in western Ireland as a chronic problem."
Therefore, my brothers and sisters, these are the ones who insult the Chosen One, peace be upon him. These are the ones who, in their official Catholic position, promote a book that attacks the Prophet, peace be upon him, for his noble marriage to Aisha, may God be pleased with her, and his other chaste wives, the Mothers of the Believers. The scholars of Islam, by the grace of God the Almighty, have not accused any of them of this dirty accusation in which thousands of Catholic clergy wallow.
O Muslims, if you know the blessing of God after that, then praise Him for the blessing of Islam. Praise God that your Prophet and role model is Muhammad, peace be upon him. Is it equal to have a messenger of Allah who is always his leader and another guide whose father is Abu Lahab?
If you know the blessing of God, then gather your breaths and submit your hearts and say with full mouths: "O Lord, to You be the praise that You sent to us Muhammad as a witness, a bringer of good tidings, a warner, and a caller to Allah by His permission and a shining lamp." Pray for the one whom Allah the Almighty said to him: {And indeed, you are of a great character} [Al-Qalam: 4].
If you know the blessing of God, then pray for the one who guided you to Allah so that you worshiped Him, and for the mosque, the House of Allah, which you entered, and for monotheism, the path to Paradise, which you followed, if Allah wills.
If you know the blessing of God, then pray for the one whose forehead was injured, whose ribs were broken, and whose back was lashed with the rope until he was wounded and choked with his garment until he fainted and was harmed in his daughter. She was harmed by Uqba bin Abi Mu'ait, so she was thrown and her pregnancy fell. He, peace be upon him, twisted in hunger and did not find from the bad dates what would fill his stomach. He died of hunger and did not taste the bread of barley. In all that, he did not see himself nor did he care about what befell him, and he had no demand except to say: "O Allah, my nation, my nation, O Allah, my nation, my nation." It was said to him: "We will please you in your nation and will not harm you." Pray for him and send greetings of peace.
Pray for the one whom Allah has favored you by sending him to you, saying: {Indeed, Allah has conferred a great favor upon the believers when He sent among them a Messenger from themselves} [Al-Imran: 164].
O servants of Allah, imagine for a moment that Allah the Almighty did not send Muhammad. Imagine that before 14 centuries, the light did not shine in the darkness of humanity, and the centuries passed while humanity was drowning in its ignorance, misguidance, and bloodshed until you came out of your mothers' wombs, then you looked around and saw what you were chosen to be: worshipers of stone or worshipers of cows or beasts that play with minds and waste dignity and prostitute honor as we saw with the rabbis and monks.
Do you know, O servants of Allah, after hearing this speech, why the verses of the sword and the hadiths of the sword? Do you know why Muslims must impose the dominance of Islam on humanity? Do you know why, although the conquests during the time of the righteous caliphs led to the killing of thousands of soldiers, they were a mercy to humanity? Do you know why Allah the Almighty said: {And We have not sent you except as a mercy to the worlds} [Al-Anbiya: 107]?
How many noble expeditions for the Messenger In it, there is satisfaction with the truth or elevation It was severe for the soldiers of Allah in it In its aftermath, ease for the worlds They struck ignorance a blow that removed it So on ignorance and misguidance, there is forgiveness They supported peace in war and for a long time Blood was spared in time blood They supported peace in war and for a long time Blood was spared in time blood
Do you know why Allah the Almighty said: {And fight them until there is no more fitnah and until the religion is for Allah. If they cease, then Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful} [Al-Baqarah: 193]? How can one deal with such people mentioned from soldiers of priests and stubborn monks except by fighting? Is a white rose or a dove of peace useful with them? Do you know the foolishness of the statement of one who says: "It is necessary for the followers of different religions to coexist without wars"? This statement is like saying: "It is necessary for water to reconcile with fire, it is necessary for light to coexist with darkness."
There is no safety, no peace, and no protection of money, honor, and minds except under the shade of the righteous Islamic rule. {And if Allah had not repelled some people by others, the earth would have been corrupted} [Al-Baqarah: 251]. The earth would have been corrupted, but Allah is full of grace to the worlds. Therefore, the jihad of conquests is a grace from Allah to the people. Without it, humans would eat each other.
Therefore, O Muslim, raise your head with your religion, be proud of your Islamic identity, and be proud of every verse in the Book of your Lord, glorified and exalted be He, and every hadith in the Sunnah of your Prophet, peace be upon him, and your great Islamic history.
O Allah, benefit us with what You have taught us, teach us what benefits us, and make us among those who listen to the word and follow the best of it. And our final invocation is that all praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. May the blessings and peace and blessings of Allah be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and companions altogether, and those who follow them in righteousness until the Day of Judgment. Peace be upon you all, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.
{Declaration of immunity by Allah and His Messenger to those of the idolaters with whom you have made a treaty * Travel freely in the land for four months and know that you cannot escape Allah, and that Allah will disgrace the disbelievers * And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage that Allah is free from the idolaters and so is His Messenger. If you repent, it is better for you; but if you turn away, then know that you cannot escape Allah. And give tidings to those who disbelieve of a painful punishment} [At-Tawbah: 1-3].
[Music]
{Excepted are those of the idolaters with whom you made a treaty and have not subsequently failed you in anything nor supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to the end of its term. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous * Then when the sacred months have passed, kill the idolaters wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them go on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful * And if any of the idolaters seeks your protection, grant him protection so that he may hear the word of Allah. Then deliver him to his place of safety. That is because they are a people who do not know * How can there be a treaty before Allah and His Messenger with the idolaters except for those with whom you made a treaty at al-Masjid al-Haram? So as long as they are upright toward you, be upright toward them. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous * How can there be for the idolaters a treaty before Allah and His Messenger, except for those with whom you made a treaty at al-Masjid al-Haram? So if they are upright toward you, then be upright toward them. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous * But if they break their oaths after making their treaty and defame your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief - they have no oaths - that they might desist} [At-Tawbah: 4-12].
{Will you not fight a people who have broken their oaths and determined to expel the Messenger, and they attacked you first? Do you fear them? But Allah has more right that you should fear Him, if you are [truly] believers * Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and satisfy the hearts of a believing people * And remove the fury in the believers' hearts and turn the hearts of a people to Islam. And Allah is Knowing and Wise} [At-Tawbah: 13-15].