Has Materialism Hijacked Science
Isn’t it fair to admit that materialism
—even though it excludes the Creator
from its explanations
for life and the universe—
has achieved great benefits
for Mankind through science
and its various discoveries?
So, is our need to acknowledge
the existence of the Creator simply
to satisfy our spiritual needs,
regulate our social relationships,
and improve our Afterlife?
If we prove that most
scientists —of any given time—
are materialists
in their interpretations
isn't this an indication that
acknowledging a Creator for the universe
is not necessary for progress
in sciences and discoveries?
In fact, didn't the West advance
only after
they limited the role
of religion in their lives?
Doesn't this indicate that religion
obstructs progress in science?
Or is there a fundamental
flaw in all aforementioned concepts
because of the big lie
that we've unconsciously accepted?
In this episode, we will answer these
questions and many more, so stay tuned
Peace be upon you
While sitting enjoying Allah's
blessings, we hear a loud noise
We head toward the source of the
noise and see a handsome boy
called Science
whose face is smeared with black paint
grabbed by a masked person
planning to kidnap him and
claiming to be the boy's father!
Another person accuses the masked man
of stealing the boy from him
We listen to each of them
and feel that
the masked man's voice is familiar
but we don't know who he is
In this episode
we will examine
the ancestry of this boy
in order to hand the boy
over to his true father
and unmask the masked man
to identify him
Let's perform a DNA test to see
who is telling the truth and who's lying
Both men are claiming
to be the father of "Science"
The first represents the system
of "Belief in the Creator"
which acknowledges that there must be
a Creator for this universe and life
Who is needed by everything
while needing nothing
We took a sample from the system
of "Belief in the Creator"
and we found that its knowledge
is based on four bases
(just like the nitrogenous bases
in genetic material):
innate nature, mind,
testimony, and senses
This system
explains the universe and life
based on input
from these four bases
These interpretations include
unseen things
that has been validated by
the integration of these bases
We turned our attention
to the masked man
But, before examining his genetic material
we asked him: "Who are you?"
He answered:
"My name is Materialism
and sometimes they call me Naturalism."
"What does materialism
or naturalism mean?"
He said: "It means that
I do not acknowledge
intangibles in interpreting
the universe and life.
Instead, I revert everything to matter
and explain the universe and life
based on material things; nothing else.
Because of this, I was able
to father my son, Science.
So, you can say that I am
the father of Science
or his mother
as "Manbendra N. Roy" says:
'The materialist conception of the origin
and evolution of the universe
is the mother of Science.'"
"Wait a minute! You don't acknowledge
the Unseen! Are you atheism?"
He said:
"No! What atheism?
I have nothing to do with atheism
or the conflict between
religion and atheism.
I judge everything objectively.
Atheism is a predetermined
dogmatic position.
While I do not have
any predetermined viewpoints."
"But you said that you
proceed on the basis
of denying the Unseen.
Isn't this an ideological position?"
He said: "No. I exclude the Unseen
because this is what Science indicates.
Science has proven to me
that the Unseen is not required."
"Come on man! You say that
you fathered "Science"
after you excluded the Unseen from the
interpretations of life and the universe
but now you are saying
that you excluded the Unseen
as a result of "Science"
So, let's get this straight:
Is "Science" a premise or a result?
Did he result from excluding the Unseen
or did he produce this exclusion?
Is he your father
or are you his?"
The masked man said:
"Science and I are one thing
as many scientists believe."
"Hmmm...It looks like
we're facing another Trinity...
You are the father
"Science" is the son;
vice versa;
and both of you are one!
Don't you, masked man
notice your confusion in determining
your relationship with Science?
The masked man said: "You can say
that Science and I have common origins.
We revolve around each other.
If Science shows me something new,
I will accept it; no matter what
As per this 2018 paper:
'The naturalism of the sciences'"
"You don't have any pre-existing
judgments?" He said: "No!"
"Are you ready to go
where Science takes you?"
He said: "Yes!"
"Are you sure?"
He said: "Of course! That's why
they call me 'Scientific Materialism'
Science and I are one thing."
The masked man —trying to show
his impartiality and objectivity—
continues: "It is not my job to deny
or prove the existence of God.
This issue does not concern me
Science, including evolution
has not disproven God's existence
'because it cannot be allowed
to consider it'
according to Dr. Scott C. Todd
in "Nature".
The important thing is that I do
not acknowledge
that there must be a Creator
for life and the universe
Who overseas the affairs
of His creation.
I will give you an independent
interpretation of the universe and life
As Dr. Franklin Harold says:
'Let me, therefore, state
unambiguously
that I, like the vast majority
of contemporary scientists
see the living world as wholly
the product of natural causes.'"
The masked man continued: "I alone
can provide convincing explanations
through my son, Science.
And then, if you want
to resort to religion
for your psychological needs
and so-called spirituality
you are free to do so.
Keep in mind that I am on my way
to solve all problems
including psychological issues
by controlling 'Neurobiochemistry'."
Can you, masked man
give us an independent
interpretation that does NOT require
the presence of a Creator?
"Of course!"
The masked man did not realize that we
were recording his statements and promises
Remember them well, dear viewers
as we go through them one by one
Just as we did with the system of
"Belief in the Creator"
—when we took a sample
and found it to have four bases—
we took a sample
from the masked man
and examined his fertility.
We were surprised at the result!
First: Excluding the Unseen led
to the exclusion of innate nature;
denying it or contesting its credibility
This is because the existence
of a credible innate nature
means the existence of a Creator
Who instilled it in people
as we discussed in episode 5
and this is an Unseen matter
that the masked man rejects
So, the sample from the masked man:
"Materialism" did not include
the first element in the system of
"Belief in the Creator"
innate nature
Second: Innate nature
is the basis for mental axioms
such as acknowledging that
every emergent thing has a cause
From these axioms, we can build
logical evidence in our discussions
as we start with these axioms
to reach logical conclusions
Without innate nature
there are no absolute mental axioms
which destroys mental evidence
Likewise
as we've seen repeatedly
when materialism tried to bridge
the gap of the Unseen it denied
it produced Unseen myths
that conflict with the simplest axioms
and with necessary truths
agreed upon by rational people
So, it tried to persuade people
that the flaw was not in its myths
but in their minds and
in what they consider to be axioms!
Just as Richard Dawkins
and Lawrence Krauss did
when they tried to explain
the spontaneous creation
of the universe from nothing:
So they trivialize common sense
—a term with no agreed definition—
which comes in the context of axioms
i.e. agreed upon things
between rational people
So, Dawkins tells you that a universe
originating spontaneously from nothing
"does violate common sense
But as I said earlier this evening,
you can't go by common sense.
If you could do things by common sense,
we wouldn't need physicists."
This is the same logic used
by Prof. Richard Lewontin
when he justified the acceptance
of scientific assumptions
—contradictory to common sense—
no matter how absurd they seem:
"…we are forced by our a priori adherence
to material causes
to create an apparatus
of investigation and
a set of concepts that produce
material explanations,
no matter how counter-intuitive…"
So, this is their logic:
1) Materialism and science go hand in hand
2) Science is sacred
3) Science discredits mental axioms
4) Anything discredited by science
is invalid
5) So, mental axioms are invalid!
Also, according to materialism
that relies on evolution
in its attempts to explain
the origin of living things;
the human mind evolved
by a set of random changes
so there is no guarantee that
it will be guided to the truth
This is what Darwin expressed
doubts about:
"But then with me the horrid doubt
always arises
whether the convictions of man's
mind, which has been developed
from the mind
of the lower animals,
are of any value or at all trustworthy."
This is confirmed by Dawkins:
"Common sense of course comes from
what was necessary for our brains
to survive in the Pleistocene of Africa.
So, they had to survive. They had
to know how to catch a buffalo,
and how to find a water hole,
and how to climb a tree when being
pursued by a lion or something.
So, our brains were never shaped by
natural selection to understand
either Quantum Mechanics:
the theory of the very small, or
Relativity: the theory of the very fast.
And it is actually an astonishing
compliment to the human brain
that at least some humans are
capable of understanding."
So he tells you, "Common sense
of course comes from what
was necessary for our brains
to survive in the Pleistocene of Africa.
So, they had to survive. They had
to know how to catch a buffalo,
and how to find a water hole,
and how to climb a tree when being
pursued by a lion or something.
So, our brains were never
shaped by natural selection
to understand either
Quantum Mechanics
...or Relativity...
And it is actually an astonishing
compliment to the human brain
that at least some humans
are capable of understanding."
So, simply
he wants to tell you that
if you view their claims
of a universe emerging from nothing
as contradictory
to mind and basic axioms
it is because your mind has only evolved
to the extent that allows you to survive
like other animals;
not to realize facts
So, you have to trust those
with more evolved minds
that allow them to understand
the theories
that you fail to understand
That's why you view
his (and Kraus')
interpretations
about the universe and life
as a violation of mental axioms.
As if they're saying:
"Do not read the sacred
book of the universe.
You are not qualified to understand it.
We are smarter than you,
and we will read it on your behalf."
Therefore, don't be surprised
when we say that materialism
cancels mind and logical evidence
There are three conflicts
between the mind and materialism:
1) Materialism has no basis
to establish mental axioms
as materialism denies innate nature
2) Mental axioms reject absurd
materialistic interpretations
to fill the gap of the Unseen
3) The mind has no credibility
if it developed
by chance and randomness
and was not designed to know the truth
We discussed important details
on this
in episode 5 of this series:
"How Atheism Contradicts
Mind and Science"
and we highly recommend
reviewing the episode
So, the second source of knowledge
(mind and mental evidence) is missing
in materialism; while it exists
in the system of "Belief in the Creator"
Third: The fever of materialistic
skepticism and denial
has infected the third source
of knowledge: testimony
Past observations and
experiences are valuable
if we acknowledge that
the universe and life
are in a state of order:
controlled by fixed laws;
if we acknowledge that
there is consistency in behavior
and constancy in laws
which allows us
to generalize the results of an
experiment or an observation
to all other unexamined cases
(under the same conditions)
Thus human knowledge and experience
is cumulative
Because of our masked
friend's denial of the Unseen
he was compelled to say that
the universe emerged accidentally
as stated in Alan Lightman's book:
"The Accidental Universe
The World You Thought You Knew"
which states:
"And our universe is just one
lucky draw from the hat,
in which case we are accidental.
We are an accidental universe."
So he tells us that
our entire universe is accidental
How can randomness and chance
create order, fixed rules, and systems?
If you do an experiment
and produce certain results;
your results and experiences
mean nothing to me
as what guarantees that
—if I repeat your experiment—
I will get the same results?
This is only guaranteed
under fixed laws and systems
while the randomness of Materialism
does not guarantee any of this
Therefore, the testimony of others
about their experiences
and observations are worthless;
no matter how reliable
or repetitive they are
Consequently, there is no place
for cumulative knowledge
When you hear a materialist say:
"I'm not convinced until I see for myself"
he is trying to stay true
to his materialism
But wait! The expectation
of fixed laws in the universe
is in the innate nature of Man
and even in animals
This can be clearly seen
when they avoid places of danger
even if they experience it once only
So how does materialism require
randomness? By innate nature?
Didn't we tell you that materialism
doesn't acknowledge innate nature
because it is Unseen?
Materialism also damages
the trustworthiness of testimony
because moral values such as
honesty and scientific integrity
have of no value when
the Creator is excluded
from the explanations
of life and the universe
because there is no lab experiment
—on a materialistic basis—
to prove that honesty
is a good and desired trait
Thus, there is no non-material
motive for materialistic researchers
to be honest about their
claimed research results
Such skewed motives poison
the well of scientific research
So, the sample from the
masked man: Materialism
was missing the third element
that exists the system of "Belief in
the Creator": testimonial evidence
You might say:
"But you must have found 'observation'?"
as this is consistent with
the masked man's name: "Materialism"
I'll say: "Observation is not limited
to observing things directly
but also includes
observing their effects."
Many physicists say:
"…the known kinds of matter and energy
make up only about 4% of the universe…
The nature of 96% of physical
reality is literally obscure."
They call it dark matter and dark energy
Have you seen it?
"No!"
Then, why is the acknowledgment
of its existence 'scientific'?
They said: "From its effects;
what we observe from the behavior
of tangibles necessitates
that it must exist.
The universe is expanding rapidly
and this expansion requires energy
which we call dark energy."
Watch this clip of the
physicist Harry Cliff:
"But in 1998, astronomers
made a stunning discovery,
that the expansion of the universe
is actually speeding up.
The universe is getting bigger
and bigger, faster and faster,
driven by a mysterious repulsive
force called dark energy.
Now, whenever you hear
the word 'dark' in physics
you should get very suspicious
because it probably means
that we don't know
what we're talking about."
So he warns you
that the word 'dark'
should make you suspect
that they don't know
what they're talking about!
They know nothing about it, yet
they believe it exists from its effects
Let's set aside the issue
of whether this energy truly exists
What concerns us here is that the
scientific community fully accepts
—with conviction—the existence
of something based on its effects
While our masked friend
excluded the existence of a Creator
even though His effects (everything
in the universe) point to Him
As if he's telling us:
"Effects are meaningless.
I must see the thing.
I must feel it directly."
On the other hand
when the masked man
needed to fill the gap of the Unseen
he created, he made up stories
about extraterrestrial aliens
that seeded life on Earth;
about multiple universes to
explain the fine-tuning, and so on
He presented us with things
which none have observed
—directly or through their effects—
a clear violation of correct observation
Materialism contradicts the known
definition of sensory observation
as directly observing something
or sensing its effects
Instead it presents delusions
that contradict observation
And so the sample from the masked man
was missing the fourth and last source
of knowledge that exists in the
system of "Belief in the Creator":
Observational evidence
So, we could not find any source
of knowledge in the masked man's sample
Instead, we found him completely infertile
He could not have fathered
this handsome boy: Science
which he claims as a son!
So, both systems: Belief in the
Creator and Materialism, were examined
Before we issue our final verdict
let's take a DNA sample
from the Boy: Science
to see whose features he inherited
Thus far, we've called him
"Science" for short
because the Arabic term
is not one word
It is "observational experimental
knowledge"
which existed before
the term "Science" was coined
in a nation other than the one
that coined it, as we will see
So, from now on, whether
we say "Science" or
"Experimental Knowledge"
we're talking about the same thing
We took a sample from Science and
asked ourselves, "What is Science?"
The British Scientific Council
—after a year of working on a definition—
came up with what
they claimed to be the first
'official definition of science'
ever published
What is this definition?
"Science is the pursuit of knowledge
and understanding of
the natural and social world
following a systematic methodology
based on evidence."
Knowledge, understanding, and
evidence are all mind-based concepts
But the mind has no credibility according
to the fundamentals of materialism
British biologist Thomas Huxley
nicknamed "Darwin's bulldog"
i.e. Darwin's pet dog
because of his intense enthusiasm
for Darwin's ideas
defined science as:
"Science is simply common
sense at its best,
that is, rigidly accurate in observation,
and merciless to fallacy in logic."
Common sense
which they ended up rejecting!
As for logical fallacies, we have seen
how the materialistic myth of evolution
is the best example for
a mixture of compounded logical fallacies
Keep in mind that we have
not finished the list yet
We've only reached
the thirteenth fallacy
Empirical science formulates hypotheses
and establishes laws and theories
as Dominique Lecourt said in
"La Philosophie des Sciences"
Theories...what is the definition
of a scientific theory?
Let's see! According to the American
National Academy of Science (NAS):
"Theory: In science,
a well-substantiated explanation
of some aspect of the natural world
that can incorporate facts, laws,
inferences, and tested hypotheses."
Let's go through the definition:
"Theory …is a well-substantiated
explanation…"
So, the mind is required to judge
if the evidence is substantial
"…of some aspect of the natural
world that can incorporate facts…"
In the episode "How Atheism
Contradicts Mind and Science"
we saw how there are no truths
except by acknowledging the Creator
and that denying Him leads to statements
such as: "the truth is relative"
and "there is no such thing
as the absolute truth"
"…laws…" which indicate a state of
consistency and fixed cosmic laws
which cannot exist through
randomness and coincidence
"…inferences…"
which require the mind
and the deduction of intangibles
from their tangible effects
"…and tested hypotheses" with
results from the testimonial evidence
of the researchers
who conducted the research
It is a definition packed full of
innate nature, mind, testimony,
and observations (including tangible
effects of the intangibles)!
So that our discussion
isn't purely theoretical
let's take an example
from experimental science
and —while examining it—scrutinize
the face of the boy: Science
Will we find a resemblance to the features
of Belief in the Creator or Materialism?
In 2007, I began a research expedition
with my colleagues in Jordan
in the field of wound healing
We started by studying
the molecular structure of two substances
Wait a minute!
Did we ourselves or did others
directly observe
the molecular structure
of these two substances?
No, the molecular
structure of a substance is inferred
through its observable effects even
when the structure itself is unobservable
This is achieved through analytical
and organic chemistry tests
Some research
had indicated the capacity
of these two substances to
help with wound healing
Because the published research
on one of these substances was deficient
we verified this property ourselves
using an animal sample and
following a strict methodology
We published our results in
a global scientific journal
We noticed, through the interaction
of observation and mind
that there is a common moiety
in the two compounds
and deduced with our minds
that this substructure
may be the reason for
their common wound-healing property
That is because we believe in
the innate 'principle of causality':
That the Creator creates a cause
for every emergent thing
We deduced with our minds
that other compounds
with this common substructure
may also have
the wound-healing property
Some may have other properties
that disrupt or weaken
the healing property
But the presence
of this specific substructure
made these compounds
better candidates for our experiment
We used a software program
to plot the three-dimensional structure
of the compounds
and ran it
for about forty medicinal compounds
to arrange them
according to their similarity
to the common moiety that
we noticed in the initial two compounds
We started testing the compounds
in this order
on wounds we caused in animals
How did we learn about the
benefits of all the chemical, microscopic,
and mechanical tests we used?
From the experiments of those before us
Since the universe
runs according to fixed laws
we could expect their
applicability in our case;
so we build upon it as
human knowledge accumulates
After a long journey, we proved that
two of these compounds do actually
help in improving the quality
of healed wounds,
published these results
in a US magazine,
and obtained two patents
for the two compounds
But wait a minute! Why do journals
publish the results of such experiments?
What do these results
mean for the rest of humanity?
They publish because they all believe
in the principle of consistency
and in the persistency of laws
which allows others to build upon
the results of past experiments
and benefit from them
Otherwise
the citations and references at the end
of every scientific research
have no value
if there are no fixed laws
and testimonial evidence is discredited
as materialism dictates
Every genuine scientific research is based
on causal relationships
among observed things
or their effects
This is built on the conviction that
there are facts and laws in this universe;
the testimony of other researchers
after the necessary authentication;
and the use of the mind
throughout the entire process
Causality, innate nature, mind, testimony,
authentication of the testimony,
fixed laws, observations, and effects
Do you see these features in the system
of "Belief in the Creator" or Materialism?
So, the verdict is out
to return the kidnapped boy:
Science from the masked man:
Materialism
to his true father:
the system of "Belief in the Creator"
We did this
after going through four steps:
1) Demonstrating the sources of knowledge
in the system of "Belief in the Creator"
2) Exposing the confusion
of materialism in defining
its relationship with Science
3) Revealing the breakdown in the
sources of knowledge in Materialism
4) Finally, proving that Science
is based entirely on
the sources of knowledge in
the system of "Belief in the Creator"
Wait a minute!
How did the masked man
manage to deceive so many
and persuade them
that —despite being infertile—
he was the true father of Science?
You will know the answer
if you observe creatures
very similar to him: Viruses
The sickening virus does
not provide any benefit;
does not have any means
for survival or reproduction
outside a live host;
and is not classified among living beings
What does it do to reproduce?
It hijacks living cells
and injects its genetic
material into the living cell
This genetic material
produces what resembles a copy
that inserts itself into
the genetic material of the cell
Genetic material readers
are then fooled by the viral
copy and read it
as they read the normal
genetic material of the cell
and produce more of the virus
which then takes off to invade
other cells, corrupt them,
and harm them;
offering them no benefit whatsoever!
This exactly is what Materialism does!
When we restricted him to his declared
starting position: Denial of the Unseen
all his sources of knowledge collapsed
beneath him;
leaving him suspended in the air!
So, he had to resort to hijacking
an integrated comprehensive system
The materialism virus injected his
harmful genes into the souls of Mankind
These souls are like cells and the system
of "Belief in the Creator" is the original
genetic material with "readers"
to translate into proteins
Souls are innately provided with
the system of belief in the Creator
The materialism virus slyly injected
its genetic material in souls
The readers came along
to read the genetic material
which contains the sources
of knowledge
along with the material
from the materialism virus
The output was a mix of beneficial
proteins and new harmful
versions of the virus
When naive people
looked at a person infected
with the materialism virus and saw
him producing useful science
they attributed this science
to the virus
as the presentation of his science
was mixed with the delirium of materialism
just like the virus genes intermixed
with the original genes of the cell
However, upon investigation
you'll find that every good thing
that comes from anyone
infected with the materialism virus
is due to the the system of
"Belief in the Creator"
originally instilled in him
While his evil and corruption
is from the materialism virus
It is impossible to find any useful theory
or discovery based on pure materialism
Rather, all useful aspects
result from
the violation of materialism
in application
Thus, they are based on stealing from
the system of "Belief in the Creator"
It's not scientific to list
names of famous materialist scientists
and for me to respond with
a list of Muslim or non-Muslim believers
like Bacon, Galileo, Kepler
Newton, Maxwell, Max Planck, etc.
Rather, the correct scientific approach
is to search for the sources
of beneficial knowledge
in both the materialist
and the believer
Show me one useful research
based on the conviction
that the universe is random;
without any laws
Show me any discovery
that resulted from the denial of innate
principles and mental axioms
You might say:
"Westerners advanced
when they got rid of religion."
I ask you: "Which religion?
They got rid of false Unseens that
contradict mind and innate nature;
related by false testimony
They were liberated from
falsely restraining the mind
They freed themselves from
the God of the Gaps concept
promoted by the Church
This liberation propelled them forward
as they used the innate principles
and mental axioms based on
the system of "Belief in the Creator"
—even while denying them
with their tongues—
They built upon the achievements
of preceding scientists
who were not afflicted by
the materialism virus
People, dear viewers
are vessels
where many inputs intermix
and an output is produced
These inputs may
contradict with each other
You may find someone
claiming a materialistic outlook
while contradicting materialism
in all his scientific activity;
violating the requirement of materialism
to ignore
innate nature and mind
He may be active in observation
and experimentation
In this case, should his
discoveries and achievements
be attributed
to the materialism he claims
but ignores in his scientific practice?
Imagine a researcher produces
research that states:
"After months of surveying
the most famous biologists
I found that most of them
lie in their daily lives,
which indicates that lying leads to
scientific success and excellence."
Is that scientific logic
or a joke?
Only with the zealots of materialism
do jokes become 'science'
to deceive people,
shut down their perception,
and limit their thinking
to naive superficiality!
We are not saying that
experimental science is a product
of scientists
who believe in the Creator
Nor are we concerned about the ratio
of believers vs. deniers
All we're saying is that all useful
science produced by any scientist
is the product of his commitment
—in his research—
to the knowledge sources in the
system of "Belief in the Creator"
whether he notices or admits
this commitment; or not
If the naive person who says:
"Most of the scientists are materialists
which shows that materialism is the
cause of progress in empirical science!"
had lived in the centuries
when Muslims
were the leaders of science
—while Europe drowned in ignorance
and backwardness— what would he say?
What would he say
if he read Robert Briffault's book:
"The Making of Humanity"
which refutes the claim
that Bacon set the foundations
of empirical science?
Briffault says:
"…It was under their successors
at that Oxford school
that Roger Bacon learned
Arabic and Arabic science.
Neither Roger Bacon nor his later
namesake has any title to be credited
with having introduced
the experimental method.
Roger Bacon was no more than one of the
apostles of Muslim science and method
to Christian Europe…"
In this episode, our goal wasn't
to relate science to specific people
but to the the system
of "Belief in the Creator"
which exists innately
in these people
even those infected by the materialism
virus; to the point of delirium
You might say:
"Why do you combine odd statements from
Lewontin, Dawkins, Krauss, and the like?
You, believers, also have odd
statements from your scholars
and I can combine them for you!"
I tell you: "The statements
I quote from materialists
are the natural result
of their materialism
They are an embodiment of materialism
rather than an anomaly
While the statements of some
scholars in the faith system
are clearly anomalies
to the system
So their statements represent them
personally; not the system."
Accordingly
if a materialist scientist says:
"I do not deny rational axioms,
and I don't doubt the mind credibility."
We say:
"Beautiful! But you have
to admit that this contradicts
with your materialist ideology
which necessarily leads
to the denial of mind and axioms."
Now we know how the masked
man managed to delude people
into believing
that "Science" was his child
He pirated "Science" like a virus
then, to step up the deception
he blackened the boy’s face with soot
to conceal his true features
so that people would believe
his wrongful paternity claim
That is why you see them
overusing phrases
that mix the facts of science
with materialist delirium;
as if they were the same
In this paper, for example
they list
—among the Western
science assumptions—
"…the material universe is
accidentally assembled
from the smallest physical
units into larger structures
and interactive patterns through the
workings of discoverable natural laws…"
A sentence whose beginning
contradicts its end!
Accidental assembly
is a materialist hallucination
while discoverable laws
come from true science:
the offspring of the system of
"Belief in the Creator"
that believes in
consistency and persistency
Therefore, dear viewers, the materialism
system is nothing but a big lie
Thus far, what I have been
calling "system"
is neither a system
nor an independent entity
Rather, its accurate description
is the "materialism virus"
The materialism virus
has offered nothing
but harm to science;
just like other harmful viruses
It has destroyed the integrity
of many materialist researchers
leading them to falsify their results
and resulting in loss of
human life, time, and effort
It also distorted the
interpretation of scientific results
to serve its predetermined goal
of denying the true Unseens
We've seen shocking examples
of that in the episode:
"Science and Homosexuality"
and in the models of pseudoscience
reviewed in this series thus far
Then, the materialism virus
harnessed some aspects
of science for destruction
and aggression purposes
Even the senses were not spared
by the materialism virus
as it didn't forbid the forbidden
or provide a solid basis for morality
As a result, people abused liquor,
drugs, and hallucinogens
so they saw and heard
delusions and fantasies
So, nothing remains intact under
materialism; neither religion,
innate nature, mind, testimony,
senses, experimentation,
nor any integrated system
of dealing with existence
And everything falls apart!
After all that
refer to this great verse
so that your heart can
feel it word by word:
"...obey not whose heart We have made
heedless of Our Remembrance,
and who follows his own lusts, and whose
affair became a total loss." (QTM 18:28)
So, all the claims of our
masked friend were lies
He neither produced Science
not did Science lead to him
They are not the same
nor do they have common origins
He has nothing to do with science nor
does science have anything to do with him
Also, materialism can't
interpret life and the universe;
independent of other methods
as he claimed from the onset
You, dear viewer
can do this experiment yourself
Ask any "materialist" about
the nature of the relationship
between materialism and science
and see for yourself
the lies or confusion
and how they fail to differentiate
between the materialism virus
that infected them and the system of
"Belief in the Creator" rooted in them
After we separated
science from materialism
and rescued the handsome boy
from his masked abductor
we now need to
unveil the masked man
You, masked man, claim to start
from the denial of the Unseen
So, why do we find you
resorting to stupid Unseens
to fill the gap of the true Unseen?!
Why do you talk
about Unseen extraterrestrials
sowing the seed of life,
the existence of a mind
and will for microbes,
endless universes to explain
the fine-tuning of our universe,
and the universe creating itself?
Wait, there's another joke
So, this materialist tells you
that the universe was created
by a self-designing computer
All these are Unseen claims;
stupid Unseen claims
So, we must have the Unseen
because the story is incomplete without it
Saying that materialism does not accept
the Unseen is a false statement
You, masked man, lied to us
even on this
In fact,
you are ready to believe in the Unseen
So, why don’t you submit to the Unseen
that all sources of knowledge lead to?
Why don’t you submit to the Unseen
that we reach through a cohesive
streamlined methodology
instead of your stupid
baseless chaotic Unseens?
From the start, you claimed to
be objective and unbiased
with no prior judgments;
that you go with science
wherever it leads
So, why don’t you submit to
the existence of the Creator
as indicated by science
and its sources?
Here, the masked man shudders
to the extent that his mask dropped;
revealing his true face
He says, quoting Lewontin: "…for we
cannot allow any Divine Foot in the door."
and quoting Harold: "We should reject,
as a matter of principle
the substitution of intelligent design
for the dialogue of chance and necessity…"
And, quoting Todd:
"Even if all the data point to an
intelligent designer, such a hypothesis
is excluded from science
because it is not naturalistic."
And quoting Daniel Dennett:
"…I adopt the apparently dogmatic rule
that dualism is to be
avoided at all costs."
Dualism means the existence
of facts other than matter
Literally:
"…at all costs."
Aha!
The real face has finally appeared
So you, masked man
are nothing but atheism
We kicked you out of the door
you came back through the window
with a mask;
using the kidnapped boy as a facade
to beautify your ugliness
Your promises of neutrality
in the struggle
between religion and
atheism were all lies
to cover your truth
You believed the false Unseen
and disbelieved in the true Unseen
so you were among those
whom Allah described as:
"And they who have believed in
falsehood and disbelieved in Allah -
it is those who are the
losers." (QTM 29: 52)
You renounced innate nature,
discredited the mind,
denied rational axioms
and natural laws,
and distorted the indications
of tangible evidence;
all in order to deny the Creator
From the start
we recognized you by your voice
but gave you time and tricked you
into testifying against yourself
"..indeed you would know them by the
distortion in their saying.." (QTM 47:30)
Yes, materialism is nothing
but recycled atheism
So, in this episode, dear viewers
we revealed some very important facts:
We corrected the lineage
of Science and returned him
to his true father;
the system of "Belief in the Creator"
which is based on
innate nature, mind, testimony,
and observation in building knowledge
And we discovered
that attributing science
to materialism is a big lie
Rather, materialism itself is a big lie
It's nothing but masked atheism
that can't exist independently
or offer any benefit.
On the contrary, it's a virus
that has hijacked the system
of "Belief in the Creator"
Now that we've discovered all this
many measures are needed
to correct the situation
We'll leave these corrective measures
for next episode; another important one
Stay tuned
Peace be upon you