← Back to Child Law
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah.
Remember that young man who objected to us when we expressed our rejection of the child law? Many of his objections have been answered in the six episodes we have published so far. Let's answer the rest of his objections in this episode.
"What does the child law have to do with it? Are you upset because it prevents hitting children? So now, are you saying that criminal fathers will hit one of their children until his face turns black, or they can break his arm or leg?"
No, no, you are remembering hitting for intimidation. The law tries to ensure that if you get close to it, all the hyenas, wolves, and foxes on earth will intervene, and you, your son, and your daughter will become enemies. Then, the hyenas on earth will come to rule between you and your child.
Pay close attention to what the law does; because this will be withdrawn from the rest of the points we will discuss.
First step: turning the son and daughter into time bombs. The law states in Article 20: "The child has the right to be protected from all forms of violence or mistreatment or neglect or exploitation or assault on his physical or psychological or sexual safety or his detention or the commission of any act involving cruelty and likely to affect the emotional or psychological balance of the child."
Yes! Who has the right according to the law to know these terms and know if you have exposed your child to any of these things? The clause continues: "The competent authorities shall take the necessary preventive measures for that." Who? "The competent authorities shall take the necessary preventive measures for that."
These competent authorities are a phrase that drips with poison, as we have shown. So that you know who the competent authorities are, read Article 2 in the beginning of the law: "The term 'competent authorities' wherever it appears in this law shall mean any public, private, or private body concerned with the child or entrusted with providing services to him in accordance with the applicable legislation."
Any public, private, or private body, thus absolutely without any condition or restriction and without any reference to the Sharia of the Lord of the Worlds. And what is the role of these unknown private bodies between me and my son and daughter? What does this phrase "any public, private, or private body" mean? It means that you as a father and you as a mother are the least people on earth who have the right to raise your children.
Who has the first right? Of course, the United Nations and its offspring, and the civil society institutions funded by it and from Western countries and Canadian, Norwegian, Spanish grants, and the Arks Foundation supporting the perverts. These funding bodies whose religion is not your religion and whose morals are not your morals.
The competent authorities include all these bodies that monitor budgets and have long years of work, establishing and holding conferences under their supervision, and buying consciences, while you are not aware and may be lazy to know more about the law.
Every public, private, or private body includes institutions and offices that boast of the number of cases presented against fathers in courts; because they receive more money from the poisoned money. And we have seen how the United Nations, which is of course at the top of the competent authorities according to the expression of the loose child law, incites girls of fifteen years old to run away from their parents' homes and never return to them so that they may live alone with their lover, practicing fornication with her in the same house with male perverts as well.
These are the competent authorities that we will not speculate or analyze to know how they will employ the texts of the child law, but we know from their record that we have presented to you and shocked you. These competent authorities, and gradually, if they see you protecting your son or daughter from fornication, they will come to protect them; because they consider your work an assault on the psychological and sexual peace of your children, especially since the World Health Organization confirms that they have the right to obtain enjoyable sexual experiences. So how do you want to deprive your children of their right?
For these deaf children, the idea of marriage and the establishment of a family is abolished. If the competent authorities see you protecting your children from going to places of debauchery and activities that pollute the mind and spread sexual lust, they will consider this a detention of your child. If you teach your children that relationships between the sexes must be legal and that romantic relationships without marriage are harmful and deadly in this world and the hereafter, they will jump and say that this affects the emotional or psychological balance of the child.
When their business of gender transformation spreads, your daughter, after you poison her mind with their poisons and convince her that you are a male trapped in the wrong body, and convince her to undergo surgery and take hormones that destroy her health, it is forbidden for you to intervene and prevent her; because you thereby disrupt her psychological balance. Do not forget that the competent authorities will include Sikhs and the IBBF, whose reference is the pedophile's treasure. These are the bodies authorized to take the preventive measures that protect my son and daughter from me if I try to protect them from the lust and diseases of these competent authorities.
And note that these bodies will not wait for you to commit any of these violations, not at all, if they see you as a strict father, it is their right to take the necessary preventive measures for that, meaning to protect your child from you as the law stipulates. And we will become like Sweden, where it is possible to take the boy or girl from the parents if they discover that they are teaching them the culture of honor.
All these poisons did not satisfy those who put the law, so they added in Article 30: "The National Council for Family Affairs shall prepare periodic reports on the rights of the child mentioned therein, and for this purpose, it may form specialized committees and national teams and seek the assistance of any body, and these reports shall be submitted to the Council of Ministers."
Specialized committees and any body, meaning that according to the law, all the hyenas and wolves on earth can be involved in monitoring the implementation of the law. So do not come and confuse me with the issue of severe beating of children.
Of course, our societies have problems, but the cause of the problems is the distance from the Sharia of the Lord of the Worlds and drowning in filth. Those who purify us from these problems and who draft the international agreements and their sponsors from our own flesh are part of the problem, not part of the solution. All our problems as Muslims, we solve them within our Islamic system, with "Allah says and the Messenger of Allah, peace be upon him," not with the competent authorities who want to destroy the family and turn society into individuals so that it is easy to turn sons and daughters into slaves of sexual lust, goods, or buyers as we have seen.
The solution to the problem of fathers who exceed the limit in disciplining children is through education on submission to Allah in all our relationships: ruler and ruled, father and son, brother and sister, husband and wife. Education on that in the house, mosque, school, university, and media, not by destroying curricula and narrowing the educational role of mosques and employing media in dancing. After that, they come with the child law.
Some individuals were wronged in the days of the Prophet, peace be upon him, so imagine if someone said: the solution is to seek help from Quraysh and the parties, the Jews of Banu Qurayza and Banu Qaynuqa, Khaybar, al-Nadir, the Ghassanids, and the Romans, meaning we seek help from the United Nations to enact legislation instead of the legislation brought by Muhammad, peace be upon him, to help those who were wronged by the Muslims. If someone said this, what would he be described as?
Despite all this, our enemies' malice does not mean that parents should take it easy in mistreating their children under the pretext that "you have no one but me" and that "I have done better for you than the United Nations and its followers." On the contrary, the severity of their agenda should make us extremely cautious, more than we were before, not to wrong our children, nor our wives, nor our husbands. Darkness represents a gap in the fortress of the family through which they infiltrate.
"And what else do you want to add, brother? Are you angry because of the child project that prevents a father from hitting his daughter if he sees her messaging boys or going out with boys? Is the solution in beating or in discussion, dialogue, and persuasion? Do you want our daughters to become hypocrites?"
Dialogue and persuasion are what we discuss among ourselves as parents who advise each other, not what drives our daughters towards corruption and removes all obstacles from their path towards the abyss of deviation, and then comes to sedate us with such talk. To see where they want to take our daughters, we must look at the bigger picture: how the poisonous words in the child law pave the way for similar ones in the United Nations Convention, which we are making the law for, and what the final outcome is in Western societies that have applied these laws.
A complete law with no clause about education in religion and morality, while there is a clause about the child's right to participate in recreational clubs. Article 18: "The child has the right to participate in gatherings and clubs through which he practices his social, cultural, and recreational activities, and engages in games, sports, and arts in a manner consistent with his age and degree of maturity according to the applicable legislation." After that, "the competent authorities for the child shall ensure the following: one, two, three: laying the foundations for selecting and training workers in recreational, educational, cultural, artistic, and scientific fields for children."
We have seen examples of these clubs, such as the association that took our children from the age of thirteen to eighteen to swimming pools and dance halls in the Zionist entity, even though it is ostensibly a cultural association, and the director of one of the schools complained about it repeatedly and was not responded to. According to the law, the father is now prohibited from preventing his son from going with these associations. There is no religion or morality, while there is arousal of instincts. What is the result? Driving towards lewdness.
The child law tells him: "What are you afraid of? What are you afraid of? Are you doing something wrong?" Wrong is what the law defines as wrong, your reference is not Islam, of course. I noticed that the words Islam, religion, Quran, and Sunnah did not appear in the child law at all.
If you act freely and fall into fornication, which the law still criminalizes in a general but soft way, you are still a child by the law's definition as long as your age is under eighteen and you are not responsible. "Are you afraid someone will see your messages? We will make the law confidential for you. If your father, mother, older brother, or sister try to see, just call us and we will discipline them for you. Are you afraid your father will punish you? The law will break his hand and punish him. Don't know how to seduce the other party? We will teach you in the sexual health lessons that we have made one of your rights according to the law. And here we have prepared programs under the auspices of the United Nations Population Fund in Jordan for comprehensive sexual education, peer training programs so that youth and girls teach each other about sex. Are you afraid to get pregnant? We don't care, we will register your son as we recently amended in the law and woe to those who stand in your way in all this or open a loophole. Your parents' role is only to feed you, give you drink, and spend on you."
If the girl replies: "No, I want to get married in a halal way." Forbidden, forbidden to marry under eighteen, you are a minor. This method is the one that produces hypocritical girls, even rebellious in sin, in the way of the lost girls in the West. And then they come to tell us about dialogue and persuasion. What dialogue if you want to pollute our sons and daughters with poisonous ideas and incite them to reject the reference of the Sharia and to legalize what Allah has permitted and prohibit what He has forbidden, so that there is no common language for dialogue. You plant the poison and then ask us to remove the poison with dialogue. What dialogue do you incite the children against their parents and leave them in a relationship of challenge and hostility.
"What else do you want to add, brother? Are you angry because the law requires educating boys and girls about sexual life? Come on, do you want the boy and girl to get married and be ignorant about sexual life so that their marriage succeeds?"
And you have noticed that even its name is sexual health, meaning what do we have to do with our women, brother? They mean what they want, we interpret sexual health in the law in our own way. No, this is extreme naivety. The competent authorities referred to by the law are equipped with cadres, curricula, books, clips, and guidelines for teaching obscenities, and they have long experience in entering different countries and influencing people of different religions through concealment and gradualism, as we have seen directly and through intermediaries from civil society organizations supported by them, and it will follow up on the implementation of the law and ensure that the boy and girl have learned sex in the way they want, which they have placed in the law. Do they have a sexual health curriculum derived from the Sharia and achieves its purposes? If they do, let them present it to us instead of always referring to the competent authorities whose reality and morals we have seen.
"What else do you have? Don't you like the freedom of expression stipulated in the draft child law? Do you want the child to remain repressed, oppressed, and stifled so that you can breathe your psychological complexes and feelings of inferiority on the poor thing?"
We have repeatedly shown that Islam honors the child, and at the same time, Islam is not based on absolute freedom but on the obedience of Allah the Almighty. We have shown that the countries that raise the banner of absolute freedom are liars, in the end, there must be limits and prohibitions, but the difference is that these limits are either from humans, making the matter enslavement of humans to humans, or from the Lord of humans, the Wise, the Knowing. The difference is that in Islam there are real sanctities that deserve to be sanctified and no one is allowed to violate them, while in human systems, sanctities are fabricated and freedoms are determined to preserve them.
In Western countries, you find the teacher in school free to poison the minds of children to convince them of gender transformation, while when the child returns from school, if the father tries to remove these poisons, he is criminalized by the law and deprived of freedom of expression. You find the burning of the Mushaf and the insult to Islam is allowed in the name of freedom of expression, while talking about perverts is criminalized and deprived of freedom of expression. This is what the competent authorities want to reach us, and we have seen their videos directed at Muslims in the Arabic language on how freedom of expression for them is the expression of the boy or girl about being perverted or their desire or her desire to change gender after they have played with their minds.
If in an Arab or Muslim country a person is rude to the sanctities of religion, it is possible to overlook it in the name of freedom of expression, while if he expresses his rejection of the ruling system in his country, he is deprived of freedom of expression. So do not try to laugh at us with the issue of freedom of expression.
"Hey, what else do you have to say, guys? Don't you like that the law states that the child's privacy should be respected in their correspondence? Do you want to spy on them and consider your children's privacy as permissible? Isn't spying forbidden?"
You're bringing this up again because when someone leads my son towards corruption, they are poison. You want to corrupt our children, destroy their morals, steal them from us, and prevent us from protecting them from you. We've seen how the United Nations produces media content to lure Muslim girls and laugh at them until they take them out of their homes to turn them into sexual commodities in the hands of sex traffickers. Do they want us to look at the private correspondence through which they lure our sons and daughters?
We've seen how the relevant authorities, as per the vague child law, consider pornographic films part of sexual health. For years, the sensible people in the country have been demanding the blocking of pornographic sites, and their demands are not being met. However, if a boy enters politically undesirable sites and posts a comment they don't like, certain authorities come and harass him and those behind him, and they expose his correspondence, accounts, relationships, and contacts, and there is no privacy in this case. Don't laugh at us with the privacy clause that comes in the child law within a completely corrupt system. It is my duty to protect my son and daughter from sex mafias and systematic brainwashing, in accordance with the saying of Allah the Almighty.
"What else do you have to say, guys? Bring us one clause in the law that explicitly contradicts our Islamic religion and our noble values. Just one."
All the law is in conflict with our religion as long as it makes the reference to the relevant authorities, this poisonous phrase repeated everywhere in the law. The relevant authorities that incite girls to run away from their conservative societies and their highly religious fathers. The secret was that my mother's husband was highly religious, and we lived in a small conservative society where I had to hide my true self and needed to escape.
The Lord of the Worlds says, meaning when there are people who do not spare any effort to bring harm and trouble to you and want your destruction, do not take them as close friends, do not confide in them about your affairs, and do not entrust them with any tasks. So how, when the law makes these relevant authorities the reference, the decision-maker, the arbiter, and the one who sets the curricula and judges between us and our children? Not only are they a fifth column, but they control our lives. Is there a greater crime than that? Is there a greater violation of our religion than that?
"What else do you have to say, guys? Do you really think the world is targeting you as Muslims, coming to fight your religion and destroy the morals of your children? Brother, the world doesn't care about you, doesn't see you, and isn't afraid of you because you are weak and backward."
Of course, we have seen ample evidence that the Islamic world is not only being targeted but is a priority for organizations hostile to religion and morals, such as ARKS Foundation with its huge budgets. In many countries, they publish drawings of hijab-wearing women who are deviant in the streets, and the German media announces the first mosque in such and such an area celebrating homosexuals. And clips from the United Nations and others promote deviance among Muslims in their own language.
Our nation is weak now, yes, weak, but what distinguishes it is that it has the scale that reminds humanity of its innate nature. Just as the people of Lot said, "Expel them from your town, for they are people who purify themselves." The world is now a small village, and the slogan of the global war on innate nature is, "Expel them from your world, for they are people who purify themselves." And since expelling Muslims from the planet is impossible, they must kill the innate nature within us. Muslims, with the preserved revelation in their hands, are the last hope for humanity, the last refuge. Therefore, it is necessary to destroy this hope, demolish this refuge, and destroy the absolute truth standard that is enormously between us and them in morals and human dignity. Therefore, it poses a threat to their plans around the world, not just in our country.
"What else do you have to say, guys? Everything you do is a conspiracy theory, a conspiracy theory. The United Nations has convictions that it sees as good for humanity. You are free not to agree with these convictions, but do not accuse them of conspiring against us."
We have presented in detail and with compelling evidence from their sources that the issue is not wrong convictions but a systematic plan that uses deception, misinformation, pseudo-science, human trafficking, bribery, inducement, intimidation, and blackmail, all forms of treachery and betrayal in the interest of capitalism. The issue is not a difference in convictions and good intentions. No. The issue is a conspiracy indeed.
"What else do you have to say? Even come on. Aren't the Muslim countries members of the United Nations? So the laws they draft are not the infidels. Those who draft them, as you call and incite people. No. These laws are drafted through agreement and consultation between Muslim and non-Muslim representatives from all over the world."
By Allah, after what we have seen, we have the right to ask the representatives of Muslim countries: What are you doing in the United Nations? Where were you when these agreements were written? "If you do not know, that is a calamity, and if you know, the calamity is greater." You are either participating in the crime or you are letting it happen while you are asleep or on WhatsApp during United Nations sessions, and you are driving generations towards hell, and you have no idea. What were you doing? Your role is only that when the United Nations interrogates you about how far you have come in implementing the agreements, you respond to them like a submissive student. This is again about the reality of the United Nations and who controls it, and that it has only increased the miseries of Muslims as a burden.
"What else do you have to say, guys? Why don't you like the child law? Are you afraid for your children from it? What is this fragile religion that you raise your children on and cannot protect them from a slight change in the laws? Raise them on religion and leave them, and may the mountain not shake you with wind."
This talk is an anesthetic when it comes from those who kill the factors of immune defense, both contractual and intellectual, in children, and preoccupies the father and mother with the high cost of living so that their role diminishes greatly in influencing the children, and then comes after that to enact laws that prevent parents from raising children and tells them to raise them. The inputs have an effect and change ideas, otherwise, why do you find countries regulating and legalizing what is said in the media and holding accountable the article and the video? Tell them to the countries: What is this fragile state that an article shakes and makes it punish? You, the state, raise people on what you want and do not hold accountable those who speak against your policies, and may the mountain not shake you with wind. Do countries accept this talk? Of course not.
"Also, do you stand with this specific child law project? Aren't you the ones saying that these laws are positive and contrary to the rulings of Islamic law? What's new in the matter? According to your words, it's all ruined."
Of course, our sole reference is the Sharia, but at least we were able to close the door on our own, raise our children, and implement as much of Allah's Sharia as we can in our personal affairs, benefiting from the remnants of it in the personal status law. The child law breaks the door on us and enters our personal lives and our children. It is an advanced stage of secularism that may allow something of the private environment for upbringing. In this case, we say it is not all ruined, but this is the last of our silence, laziness, and negligence in commanding good and forbidding evil. They have entered our homes and want to steal our children from us. This must make us wake up, not just reject the law, but also work to rectify the situation and rebuild the fortifications that were destroyed, which allowed them to enter our first fortress.
"What else do you have, young man? Isn't the religion of Allah victorious, and by Allah, its light is spreading? Will a few changes in the laws erase Islam from existence?"
Of course, Islam is undoubtedly victorious, whether with honor or humiliation. However, the question is, where will we and our children be at that time? In the ranks of the honored or the humiliated? On the ship of salvation or on the road to the trash heap of history? If we remain silent about the corruption of generations, how many of them will perish and be lost before Islam is victorious? Will your children be among those with whom Muhammad, peace be upon him, will boast, or will you have regrets on the day you realize you have fattened them for the Fire? Do not laugh at us with the issue of Islam being victorious; we know.
"What else do you have, young man? Do you want Jordan and the rest of the Muslim countries to reject any amendment to the laws, even if it leads to depriving us of the aid of the United Nations fund? Do you mean that you are ready to pay millions of dinars instead of these humanitarian aids that one of you cannot even eat?"
After what we have seen of the morals and plans of those who legislate international treaties, the one who says that it is necessary to implement them, otherwise we will lose foreign aid, is actually saying that it is necessary to sell religion, morals, and dignity for the sake of money. If you are like that, then you represent only yourself. As for us and the general Muslim people, the noble, dignified, chivalrous, and proud of their religion and history, we say to you that we will sell you and your problems, but we will not sell our religion, morals, dignity, and the future of our children. And we, as a Muslim people, have not forgotten that the Provider is Allah, the Giver and the Withholder, Glorified and Exalted be He.
"What else do you have? The agreements, agendas, news, past and present history, in addition to the religious reading of the Book and the Sunnah. If a sheikh or a veiled woman or anyone who claims to be Muslim defends the child law after all this talk, I think he is either ignorant of all that we have said and is philosophizing to others who do not read, or he is one of those whom Allah has warned us about greatly in the Quran, saying: {And when it is said to them, "Do not cause corruption on the earth," they say, "We are but reformers." Unquestionably, it is they who are the corrupters, but they perceive [it] not} [Al-Baqarah: 11-12]. And those whom Allah said about: {Have you not seen those who claim, "We believe in what was revealed to you and what was revealed before you," but they wish to refer to the Taghut for judgment, while they were commanded to reject it; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray. And when it is said to them, "Come to what Allah has revealed and to the Messenger," you see the hypocrites turning away from you in aversion. But how [worse] will it be when disaster strikes them for what their hands have put forth, and they come to you swearing by Allah, "We wanted only goodness and conciliation." Those are the ones of whom Allah knows what is in their hearts, so turn away from them and advise them and speak to them a profound word} [An-Nisa': 60-63]."
Those who defend the child law after its true nature has been revealed are not providing a valid argument for the law. We have seen how institutions like ARC, for example, support religious figures who advocate for deviance, and we will see, God willing, how the US Agency for International Development will employ and export Islamic feminists to bring about the change that the United Nations desires. Thus, we have responded to this young man. May God guide you.
And I say, esteemed guests, this is the seventh episode we are publishing on the topic. The previous six episodes are filled with information and arguments. Why haven't we heard a single supporter of the child law come out to respond to any of these episodes and discuss argument with argument, refuting our evidence? Or accept our debate in a discussion broadcast on all media outlets as we have offered? "Say, 'Do you have any knowledge, so bring it forth to us?'" Knowledge, not personalization and fabrication of lies and fabrications about the speaker. We await your response.
And I say to my brothers and sisters, speaking the truth does not shorten one's lifespan or distance one from sustenance, but it raises your status and increases your reward. Allah the Almighty says: {O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah, witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness} [Al-Ma'idah: 8]. In the end, the truth is victorious after it proves those who prove themselves in these trials and fails those who fail. Choose for yourself a place between the two groups. {And Allah is dominant over His affair, but most of the people do not know} [Yusuf: 21].
Peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah.