← Back to Videos
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Poisonous Child Law - Live Broadcast
#Shameful_Confession #Child_Law_Poisoned
#Shameful_Confession #Child_Law_Poisoned
O my Lord, expand my chest for me and make my affair easy and loosen the knot from my tongue that they may understand my speech. May God reward you with good, dear brothers, and may God bless you and your time. Today we gather to discuss the law that is on the table for debate in parliament for approval in the next session. As you know, this popular momentum has an effect - God willing - in preventing the passage of this law, or at least amending its clauses to please God Almighty and His Messenger and to protect Muslim families.
With us today is a group of distinguished individuals to discuss the law and urge you to play the important role entrusted to all of us in attempting to respond to it. Our meeting agenda includes:
I would like to remind you that we are participating with the hashtag: #PoisonousChildLaw and the hashtag #ShameOnApproval. The law is currently being discussed, and there is a committee accepting comments. We want to convey the word "Fear God" to those who are responsible for these amendments; fear God in families and in the children of Muslims.
In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, and praise be to God, Lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon Muhammad and his family and companions. May God reward those who have been working on this campaign since its inception. The title of my speech: "Between Reality and Illusion... Is It Worth It?" I will try to extract the reality with neutrality and say that those who are in favor of the law and those who are against it live in a mix of reality and illusion.
Some people say, "You are exaggerating, the law is in the interest of the child, and who hates the rights of children?" This psychological debate affects many who do not understand the reality. I will play the role of "devil's advocate" and ask those who support the law (and I am among them): What do you have? The reality is that there are fathers and mothers who are unjust, and there are families that deprive girls of their rights. This is a reality that cannot be denied, and these people need a deterrent, as it is said: "God enforces with authority what is not enforced with the Quran."
However, on the other hand, there is an illusion that the other party lives. They think we are exaggerating, while we see in the West how women have become commodities, and how families have disintegrated. The reality that supporters of the law ignore is that many of those who are at the forefront of these laws need education themselves, and some of them suffer from psychological issues that they want to export to society.
This law is derived from the swamps of the West, filled with social filth. In Canada and Europe, they have begun to return to what they call "reasonable force" in upbringing after realizing the failure of their theories, while those who are infatuated with the West come to us to apply laws that even the West has surpassed. The law wants to turn family relationships from "tribal" to "digital contractual" (1+1=2), which tears apart the social fabric. Yes, we need to control reality, but with divine, legal laws that stem from our values, not with poisonous drops from external swamps.
One of the most important features of this campaign is revealing the path of criminals, which is a legitimate goal. Knowing evil for prevention is more important than searching for a cure after the disease occurs. I will talk about the "secret words" used to pass evils under bright names.
God Almighty forbade the believers from saying "protect us" because the Jews used it to harm, and commanded them to say "look at us." The terms in our current battle are crucial:
We must be aware of these terms and not be deceived by their pleasant appearance, as they are keys to great evil doors.
The most dangerous thing about this law is its "generality" and vague expressions. Someone reading the clauses on education and health may not see a problem, but the point is in the interpretation adopted by international organizations.
I will stop at two points from a psychological perspective: First: The Criterion of Right and Wrong: The law gives the child the right to express, participate, and determine privacy. In Western culture, forbidden relationships in adolescence are considered "normal," and their absence is "abnormal." How can we bring a scale from a completely different society to weigh our morals and values? This is a reckless approach to the minds.
Second: Cognitive Competence: Cognitive psychology (such as Jean Piaget's theories) confirms that a child before the age of 12 is incapable of understanding abstract concepts such as "freedom" and "identity." The global law deprives the child of financial and legal competence because he is not mature, so how can we give him "full competence" to determine his religion, gender, and orientations away from his parents? This is a stark contradiction even with the science they claim to follow. The law turns parents into "aggressors" if they practice their natural role in guidance and protection.
The most serious accusation against opponents of the law is that they do not care about children's rights or that their thinking is dark. This is deceit; we oppose the "poisonous child rights law" and do not oppose "children's rights" themselves. Rather, our motivations are Islamic and value-based, and Islam honored the child even before he was born.
Come to a fair word; let us refer to Islam. Happiness is in the Book of God, which guides to what is most upright. God Almighty forbade the burial of girls and the killing of children for fear of poverty, and the Prophet peace be upon him taught us mercy through kissing and love, and said to Al-Aqra' bin Habis: "Whoever does not show mercy will not be shown mercy." This prophetic kiss contains educational and rights meanings deeper than thousands of lines in positive laws.
Islam has granted the child rights even before the marriage of his parents, by choosing the righteous spouse. And granted him the right of inheritance while he is a fetus, the right to life, a good name, breastfeeding, upbringing, and discipline on noble morals. It even made the provision for parents better than the provision in the way of God. The Islam that took care of the rights of animals and insects (as in the hadith of the bird's hen and the ant's village), does it neglect the rights of children? Those who bring in laws from the West are ignorant of the greatness of our divine legislation that links rights with duties, while their law strikes duties and destroys the family.
The gist of this poisonous law is to remove the child from the care of his parents to become the property of the international system and public institutions, with the role of the father and mother being reduced to a marginal form. The wording in the law appears innocent (health, education, social life), but they are "time bombs" that will explode in our faces.
You will bite your fingers in regret if you do not reject it now. You will cry when you see your children practicing vice while you are shackled by the law, and you may even be imprisoned if you try to stop them. This law contradicts the Sharia of Allah in one word. My message to those who wrote it: Fear Allah and prepare an answer for the question on the Day of the Greatest Assembly.
What is the duty of the Muslim household now?
What we are experiencing today is a result of our weakness and feeling of subjugation to the dominant Western culture, which emerged from the womb of atheism and hostility to religion. This law is a tool of "new Orientalism" that employs social sciences to serve hegemony and impose control, under the guise of "instrumental knowledge."
The new colonialism disguises itself with the mask of "enlightenment and liberation," and its most wicked means is dividing Islam into "good" and "extremist" to pave the way for accepting international subjugation. They say the law has good aspects; and we say that alcohol has benefits for people, but its sin is greater than its benefit. Thus, this law; its inherent evil drowns any claimed benefit within it.
We reject the application of this law, even partially. As for the inclusion of "philosophy" in the curricula, we say: if philosophy is taught, let our children know the truth about these atheist philosophers (Nietzsche, Marx, Durkheim) whose theories were based on "the will to power," "the death of God," and "biological determinism" that justifies the annihilation of peoples.
This is the arena of the people of truth, and we appeal to the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the government: Fear Allah in your people, do not betray your religion, and do not allow a greedy group to pass this poisonous decision.
Dear brothers and sisters following, we ask you to share short video clips (15 seconds) to support the campaign, and follow our platforms on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. We will publish in sequence the details of the law's articles and the legal and Sharia responses to them.
Use the link (nochildlaw.com) to add the slogan "The Child Law is Poisonous" to your profile pictures on social media. Do not stop publishing and raising awareness in your councils and with your relatives. The matter is serious and affects the future of our generations.
We ask Allah the Almighty to protect us from the evil of this law, and to preserve our religion, security, and faith for us. Glory be to You, O Allah, and praise. We bear witness that there is no god but You. We seek Your forgiveness and repent to You. Peace be upon you, and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.