← Back to The Journey of Certainty
This content has been automatically translated. View original in Arabic
Peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah.
Dear brothers, those of you who have followed the reactions to the two episodes related to the program "Al-Dahheekh" have certainly noticed - without a doubt - the great good in many of the youth who may appear to have strayed from religion. However, when they realized that their Islam is being targeted and that there are those who deceive them in the name of science to steal what remains of their faith, a good spirit of love for Allah and His religion awakened within them. I greet these brothers and say to them: By Allah, I love you for your goodness, and I reject that they laugh at you and steal your faith.
Those who follow will also notice the nature of the responses from those who defend the promotion of atheism and superstitions. Here, allow me to clarify something important so that we are precise in our speech: Not everyone who opposes me is defending the program "Al-Dahheekh"; some have objections to my style and so on, and my words are not about them; because there is something more important.
The word is about those who defend such a program, and even these, I do not consider all of them promoters of atheism or intentionally defending the promotion of atheism, but in the end, when they insist on defending such programs, they are indeed defending the promotion of atheism and superstitions, whether they know it or not.
I know that some of those who object to me were enjoying a program like "Al-Dahheekh" and do not want to be convinced that the program has a big problem; because they love the comedy of the program or love the way some scientific ideas are presented, but they do not intend to defend atheism. Some of them may defend these programs because they are not yet convinced that they spread atheism and superstitions, or perhaps - unfortunately - their hearts are tainted with doubts and have atheistic ideas. All these young people - brothers - let us take their hands and be patient with them and not scare them away with our style; perhaps Allah will guide them through us.
And I know that on the other hand, some objectors may have an intellectual rivalry with the poor servant and expose him in any way, but this fanaticism and preconceived notions - unfortunately - make him not realize that the price he is paying is defending the spread of atheism. And there may be other reasons, those who oppose us are not the same, and it is not right to put them in one pot.
Here, I am trying to convey two messages: The first message: is to emphasize that there is a bad umbrella whose goal is to spread atheism, and the program "Al-Dahheekh" is just one of these programs that work for these goals, and these projects have increased - unfortunately - in different Muslim countries, this fact must be clear without any evasion or flattery or softening of words.
The second message: is that I want everyone to pay attention to these umbrellas and shake them off, even those who rely on them, including Ahmed Al-Ghandour (Al-Dahheekh), and his team; we want them to stop promoting atheism and superstitions and get out of this system; because in the end, brothers, we are from the nation of the one to whom Allah said: "And We have not sent you except as a mercy to the worlds" [Al-Anbiya: 107]. We, brothers, must act with the understanding that we do not have a personal grudge against anyone; but we support in Allah and oppose in Allah, our goal is not to destroy people, but to call them to the path of guidance and beneficial scientific production.
So let us agree - you who oppose us - on something: Do you have a grudge against the bearded and generalize it to all of them? No problem, hate me! But do not let your hatred for me and others throw you into the arms of atheism and superstitions and make you defend their spread. Do you have an intellectual rivalry with me? No problem, let us dialogue, but I hope you do all this away from defending what causes atheism and destructive doubts for Muslim youth. Come, let us move away from this bad umbrella and differ after it as you wish.
Are you benefiting from this media umbrella and living off it? Perhaps I cannot convince you to fear Allah so that He may provide for you from where you do not expect, but at least be careful not to reach the stage of complete bias towards promoting atheism and superstitions and defending them, so that your problem changes from weakness in standing with the truth to strength in supporting falsehood! So let us - brothers - agree to neutralize our personalities during discussions of such topics.
On the other hand, there is another category, which is our main topic for this talk, which is a group of defenders of the program who, when they were unable to refute the argument with an argument, resorted to personal attacks and slander. This behavior indicates that he is not a seeker of truth but a liar who also seeks to mislead people. We will see how this category of people behaved for a long period after my last words before they came out to us with what they called: (a discussion) of the content of my speech, or (scientific responses) from their side, and we will see the truth and their claimed scientific nature at the end of the talk as well.
If you - O speaker to the poor servant - slander me in general - away from this battle - and in what does not serve atheism and superstitions, then from me, I do not engage with you nor do I pay attention to you. But if you want to lie and slander in personal attacks to defend atheism, or you do not care if your lie defends atheism and superstitions, then yes! I am obliged to reveal your truth, obliged to reveal your lies, your ignorance, and your lack of integrity so that we can later ask: Do those who behave in this way have credibility? Can they be trusted with science or media? Do they deserve that the youth listen to them? I am obliged to show that when you lie and slander to undermine the credibility of those who expose atheism, you are gambling with the minds and beliefs of the youth for your personal problems: your intellectual hostility towards others, your psychological complexes, your livelihood, or defending an atheism that you are fanatically attached to and do not want to abandon. See - O brothers - the one who defends falsehood will be forced to lie, and the more he speaks, the more his lies will be exposed. Let us see who this rule applies to.
I will speak about three axes that the group of superstitions and slander worked on: intellectual positions (for the servant of Allah), attempts to get rid of him, and his scientific competence. Let us start with the intellectual positions.
Look, my dear ones! When I pointed out that the "Dahheek" program promotes atheism and superstitions, I went back to (18) episodes of its episodes and brought his speech with sound and image. The first response - expected from the massive media machine behind "Dahheek" with its various arms and open budget - was that it would deny my claims and respond to me scientifically as well to maintain its credibility. It is not possible, well, no problem.
This media machine could have turned away from the topic and avoided confrontation, and tried to undermine my scientific credibility, meaning do not respond to my speech about "Dahheek", no, let them go and find scientific mistakes - I am the second - from other episodes not related to responding to "Dahheek"! (46) episodes in "Journey of Certainty" - in which I fight atheism and doubts and build faith on scientific bases - it was possible for them to take these episodes, listen to them word by word, and try to find mistakes in them, to make me wrong in anything, and to confuse my response to "Dahheek". If they did that, it would not be a scientific method, but they did not do it either, because they would not be able to, because I - praise be to Allah - do not publish a single word except after verifying it myself, verifying it myself, and returning to the sources, and consulting specialists.
So what do they do? People came out who left everything related to science that I speak about, and came to my personality as (Iyad), and did not start from the scientific competence, no; they went to dig up my intellectual and political positions that are not to their liking before (6) years, meaning from the days of the Arab revolutions. Of course - O brothers - this in itself is a cowardly escape and a devastating defeat: that I speak to you with science and research, and you go to respond to me with my legal positions. This in itself is a sign of complete bankruptcy and total failure, and that you are not a seeker of truth. But never mind, no problem, they personalized the issue, we will continue with you to see the extent of your integrity and credibility.
Those who escape from scientific discussion, who worked on personalization, took advantage of the fact that most people do not know anything at all about my positions and articles before (6) years and therefore it is easy for these escapists to distort as they wish, as if there is no archive preserved from my words and videos that we will show now.
First: They started with the stereotypical image and ready-made molds: (Daeshism)! There are those who published articles with this call, but their article received ridicule and extreme mockery from the aware people, so the page was forced to withdraw the article, then they deleted it, the mockery of the people increased - the mockery of the people - and the responses to them intensified, they deleted the article a second time and published a post in which they expressed their disappointment with the comments and blamed the ignorant and fanatical Arab citizen! Meaning either you agree with their slander, or you are ignorant and fanatical! No, never mind.
If you, those interested in humanity - according to your page - are confident in your words, leave them, defend them, and bring evidence from (my archive). My archive is available. Or did you not notice when you returned to my archive that I was one of the first to criticize this group with detailed legal criticism in incident after incident, to the extent that I was harmed and attacked because of that. Or did you not read in the archive the article (The Holocaust) whose credibility we saw in reality? Or did you not read the word (The Innocence of Islam) in which I cleared Islam of all the crimes committed in its name? Or dozens of articles that show the clear methodological separation with any group that harmed the image of Islam, and we will put excerpts in the comments for those who do not know anything about this speech so that they can see how liars do not feel ashamed, and "If you do not feel ashamed, do what you want" (narrated by Bukhari). Everyone who uses the stereotypical image of Daeshism will be told: Do not delete your articles, go back and republish them and bring evidence for them, either you apologize to your readers for lying, or do not expect the youth to believe you after you have revealed your true nature.
Therefore, this lie did not work with the group of superstitions and slander, and those who use it become a laughing stock for the aware youth, and their credibility is undermined. They resorted to other means.
A writer in "Al-Arabi Al-Jadid" - I don't care to mention his name, but I mention his words because he represents another style used by the group of superstitions - this writer writes an article saying: "Al-Qanibi, who has always spoken about the Islamic State organization (ISIS) leniently and appeasingly even while criticizing their excesses in the blood of Muslims, and who has always also refused to fight them whether by the Syrian factions or by the international coalition..." Yes, so you admit that I criticize the excesses in blood, but your problem is that I am lenient with them and refused to fight them!
Come on - brothers - let's apply the rule: when someone defends falsehood - as the group of superstitions does - everything they try to defend, they will have to lie more and more. First of all: our friend says that I refused to fight them, and the truth is that I refused any fighting among Muslims, and the first fighting I refused and condemned was the fighting of this organization against other factions, and I commented on incident after incident, by name, and denied those who kill their Muslim brothers, and they are the enemy and the judge, and that this is not from the Sharia - which they raise its banner - in any way.
Secondly: our friend wants to convince you that I refused to fight them because they are (brothers in methodology) as he says in some places in his articles. Go, sir, watch for me the word (Brotherhood in Religion or Brotherhood in Methodology) go, by God, watch it which I published on: 25\04\2014 and in which I warn against loyalty and disavowal based on the group, and I emphasize that the common Muslims who love their religion and the Sharia of their Lord are more beloved to us and more honorable to us than those who claim to belong to a group that calls itself Islamic, but their morals are bad or they are lax in the blood of Muslims.
So, why then did I refuse to fight a whole group? Because I explained in many words such as the word: (God, God, O assembly of Muslims) on 24\05\2013. And the word: (Waiting for the First Shot) on 03\01\2014 I explained that the extermination fighting of a whole group will not exterminate it but will lead to a conflagration that will destroy everyone, and that whoever makes a forbidden blood permissible deserves punishment and has no dignity, no dignity, but fighting on the basis of belonging to a group of groups will not lead to the punishment of the sinner alone, but the blood of all parties will be lost.
Of course - brothers - all these positions so that you understand them correctly, you must see their context; because years have passed over them, and many events have happened afterwards, and the goal is not to reopen the topic, nor to enter into a discussion with them: what should or should not have been done before (6) years! I will not stand with the statement of this writer where he said: "Al-Qanibi refused to side with those who fight on behalf of the international system and the functional states" as if this refusal blames me! And I will not talk about what these factions did, which he talks about, which wants to side with what they did after years; so that we do not deviate from the subject, I will not go into details; because this is what some of them may wish, that we enter into a discussion, and the main issue is lost: the issue of promoting atheism and superstitions and lying and forgery that they use to attack those who reveal their reality and the reality of those who are fanatical about them.
The big problem that Muslims are currently facing, in addition to the wars against them, their enslavement, the plundering of their wealth, and their ignorance, is the fight against their religion, and the spreading of doubts and suspicions among their children to shake them from within, and we will not allow you - O those who participate in this intellectual war with knowledge or ignorance - to distract us with another matter. Our goal - brothers - is to repel the attack on all Muslims from all intellectual trends: those we see have excess, or those we see have negligence, those who have shed forbidden blood in the past, or those who have sided with those who have done injustice, we do not exclude anyone, but we want to unite on the truth; because we are facing a war that targets Islam itself and Muslims of all spectrums.
Notice - brothers - that our friend who is making his case afraid of "Al-Dahhi" something happens to him from the people who turned against him and did not like that we say no to fighting among Muslims for fear of the blood of their innocent ones, (God, God, O assembly of Muslims) (May you not be the owner of the first shot) and he considers this appeasement an accusation! No, let them kill "Al-Dahhi" is important, but thousands of Muslims who will not go to Fayis, no problem "Al-Dahhi" is important to our friend, but thousands of Muslims will not go to Fayis, no problem!
And this brings us to the third lie: our friend says: "Al-Qanibi, who has always spoken about the Islamic State organization (ISIS) leniently and appeasingly", and he implies that I am lenient because I am inclined towards them. Praise be to God, my archive is preserved to show the truth about these writers, in an article (Clearing Islam) - published on 15\08\2014 - I said clearly: "My leniency with some of the youth of these groups in speech is only to attract them to the truth and guidance; they are not equal, and I know that a number of them have been influenced - by the grace of God - and left this group, and not for my leniency in speech out of ignorance of the crimes that some members of the groups commit, nor out of ignorance of the deviation and corruption of their leaders and the security personnel within them", our friend does not like this speech! "Al-Dahhi" if he makes a mistake and tries to convince the people that the universe is arranged by chance, and that life has no purpose, and that pornographic films have a great virtue on them, we must be lenient with him and not criticize him, no one should attack him while he is going to get some apples for his program! While the youth who went astray thinking they are serving Islam, no, we are not lenient with them, nor do we fear for them, nor do we discuss with them, no and he tells you about (The slave of Allah): "And who has always also refused to fight them, whether by the Syrian factions or by the international coalition"! Meaning you have to play the tunes required of you, otherwise you are accused!
I - brothers - just as I am lenient with the youth who have fallen into atheism and who may come in and insult me and mock me, I am also lenient with the youth who have been deceived and followed deviant directions, and who we can win over by convincing and argument, and just as there are youth who became atheists and then returned by the grace of God after watching episodes of (Journey of Certainty), there are also youth who left extremism and stopped their hands from Muslims after reading my words in that period, by the grace of God the Most High. Let me tell you something? Do you see (Ahmad Al-Ghandour) himself? By God, his guidance is one of the most beloved things to us, and by God, O (Dahhi) if you retreat from what you publish and correct yourself and explain and take care of the honesty in addressing the people, by God we will celebrate with you, rejoicing that one who was destroying the faith of our youth has become beneficial to them. We - brothers - have a message, we have a goal, we love the guidance of the people, we do not tell the people that life has no purpose.
The fourth lie by the article's author - and I remind you again that this writer does not concern me, but his article has gathered lies that are scattered among others, making my task of revealing his truth and the truth of his likes easier - the fourth lie: he tries to make you think that I am against (democracy), which means freedom and the people's choice of their representatives; to make you feel that I am in favor of authoritarian rule, imposing oneself on others, and he includes in his references the phrase: (For the Unity of Ranks), seemingly relying on the fact that few will return to the sources.
Of course, those who have followed me since the days of the (Egyptian Revolution) know very well from my articles and the series (In Defense of the Sharia) that my issue with (democracy) is not that people participate in choosing their representatives, as the liars imply, but rather that democracy is a trap to bring people back into the pen of the (international system), to entrench their servitude, and to deprive them of the Sharia by which their worldly and hereafter affairs are rectified. As for imposing oneself on people and declaring that you have established a state, and come and pledge allegiance to me! I was among the first to condemn this behavior when a state was claimed in Iraq and Syria. I published a statement on (13/04/2013) titled: (For the Unity of Ranks), and another on (18/07/2014) when the (Caliphate) was announced, and I explained in both statements that Muslims need to unite their word and restore their sovereignty over their lands. When you declare a state or a caliphate from your side, you are participating in the violation of the rights of Muslims, causing their division, and you are not actually establishing a state, nor the (true Caliphate) according to the Prophetic Method, which the Prophet - peace be upon him - gave good tidings of.
Another point - dear brothers: the defenders of the "Dahhik" program ask us for justice; indeed, brother, the program has good things and useful information, so why this exclusionary attitude? Why the neglect of the good aspects and the focus on the negatives?! Well, apart from the misfortune that these people talk about atheistic statements as if they were minor mistakes, we say to them: yes, simplifying sciences is a good and required thing, but it must be based on sound scientific foundations, not a mixture of superstitions that turn people into intellectual and psychological monsters.
Also, let us ask you, if you will: since you are just with those who spread atheistic ideas, why are you angry with our justice towards the youth we used to dialogue with to stop them from fighting Muslims?! Is it not selective justice with those you like? When a group liberates Muslims and Muslim women from prisons, we rejoice in that and praise it, then we say on 15/02/2014: "At the same time, any good deed by any party does not confer legitimacy on systematic corrupt policies practiced by it, but it is said to them: 'And be not like she who unraveled her spun thread after it was strong' [Al-Nahl: 92]. We also remind the brothers who were liberated that God has blessed you with deliverance from the hands of criminals, so thank God's blessing upon you, fear God regarding your Muslim brothers, and let no one tempt you to aggression against them and the spilling of their blood; for the favor is upon you in your deliverance to God alone, so do not obey anyone in His disobedience." Is this not the justice that enhances the good side in people and fights the bad side in them?! Or is your justice according to your demand?
In conclusion, dear respected ones: those who defend with falsehood will lie more and more, acting on the saying of (Joseph Goebbels) - Hitler's media man - "Lie, then lie until people believe you, then lie more until you believe yourself!" Our Prophet - peace be upon him - said: "A man will keep lying and seeking lies until he is written with Allah as a liar" (Reported by Bukhari and Muslim). Writers who defame others out of bias towards the brothers of the methodology in order to obscure the fact that they are the ones who are biased and defending falsehood against those who promote atheism and superstitions, we are with them, but only against the promoters of atheism and superstitions! They should be pitied and guided, but with the promoters of justice, and they should focus on the positive points, but only with the promoters of atheism and superstitions! As for others, there is lying, deception, exclusion, and incitement without any moral restraint! They call for democracy and acceptance of the other, but not when the other exposes their lies and superstitions, objectively; if an atheist brings information, there is no problem, we separate his atheism from his knowledge, whereas if a Muslim exposes their superstitions - with knowledge as well - then, we do not separate at all, we go and search his history and find something to condemn him? There is no problem, we turn his words 180 degrees, and we also slander him! They mock the conspiracy theory, but when someone exposes their superstitions with science, they come out saying: they are conspiring against Al-Dahhik! His intention is to expose an atheist to incite against him, so someone goes and harms him, glory be to Allah the Great!
All of this - dear brothers - is related to the first axis that the defenders of promoting atheism and superstitions worked on.
The second axis: is the incitement to expulsion from the university and the imprisonment of (the slave of Allah)! And among the justifications: "(Qunibi) separates male students from female students in study halls"! And this is a statement published by a page - that encourages girls to reveal themselves - in the context of defending "Al-Dahhik" who talks about the virtues of porn "Porn" images and pornographic content, meaning moral problems, dishonesty, poor teaching, cheating, and other things that are often from atheist or non-religious doctors, all of this is not a problem, but the problem is when a doctor is performing his duty, keen on teaching his students, and kindly and paternally asks them to separate males and females, and the students respond with all ease and respect, is this your scientific response to my lectures? "Why don't you go to prison?!" "Expel them from your town. Indeed, they are a people who purify themselves" [Al-A'raf: 82].
The third method used by the group of superstitions is: doubting the scientific competence of your brother; doubting his competence to delve into scientific topics. Of course, brothers, the scientific methodology requires that the importance lies in the evidence, not in its bearer; the importance is not in the number of certificates, because the holder of certificates may, in the end, be a person with a personal agenda and distort science according to his whims. It is possible for a person to strive in a field outside his university specialization and come up with respectable scientific output. Nevertheless, let us see how these people act even in this aspect!
The founder of a secular page - which claims to be about science and research - published a post on this matter. Some brothers showed it to me, but the author of the post then deleted it. It is strange how they publish and delete, publish and delete! However, it is not appropriate to spend too much time talking about deleted posts.
But I will say briefly, brothers: when you want to get information about any researcher, you can go to ResearchGate or Google Scholar, type in the person's name, and look at the research they have published and the journals they have published in. You will find that the poor servant has more than 20 research papers and 15 abstracts published in internationally peer-reviewed journals, not local ones, internationally. You will also find that the research published in Houston, in which I was a co-researcher, was published in the journal "Molecular Pharmacology," which has an impact factor of 4, not 1 as someone claimed. This research has been cited 159 times so far, thanks to Allah the Almighty, meaning that 159 other researchers have referred to it. It was a turning point in its field.
In addition to the two registered invention patents that I published pictures of in the episode "The Abducted," participation in conferences, the award for best researcher in my university, and in addition to being one of the 3 academic reviewers for the most widely circulated pharmacology book in the world, "Lippincott Pharmacology," and in addition to having done my doctoral research at the Texas Medical Center, which is one of the strongest medical research centers in the world, then comes the group of superstitions - like the writer of Al-Arabi Al-Jadid - after their fabrications about my legal positions to say: "Qanibi wore the mask of a scientist who speaks with foreign sources." The journey of academic excellence - by the grace of Allah the Almighty - began at the age of 25, when I enjoyed reading biology books for hours and contemplating the creation of Allah. My grades in Biology 1 and Biology 2 were 100 and 99, respectively, the top of all medical specialties students, including medicine, pharmacy, nursing, and sciences, then the top in the bachelor's degree and the top in the PhD, by the grace of Allah the Almighty. And these people say that I have recently worn the mask of a scientist!
With all of this, I do not argue with you using my certificates, and I have not responded to those who disagree with me on any day by saying that you are not experts, or by asking: Where is your scientific output? The question that arises insistently after all this, brothers, is: If these people lie about information that can be verified so easily, how can they be trusted with science? How can we take any information from them? Don't you see, honorable ones, that these people are doing exactly what the early pagans did? The early pagans, when they avoided discussing the message, would attack the people who carried it: "He is mad," "He is a poet," "He is a priest," "He is taught by humans," and so on. These people have fled from responding to the scientific evidence and have started to diagnose and attack those who expose the spread of superstition and atheism. And when they diagnosed, they did not come up with real things, but with lies that are easy to verify.
Of course, brothers, most of the following brothers objected to this evasion practiced by the group of superstitions, even though most of my brothers are not aware that it is not just evasion, but a lie and fabrication about my thoughts and legal positions. The repeated phrase for more than ten days was: "Respond to Dr. Eyad with a scientific response." It was necessary to respond, so the responses started to come out, claiming to be scientific. Let us apply the rule again: the one who defends falsehood, the more he defends, the more falsehood he will say.
The first response was from a writer of "Al-Arabi Al-Jadid" - no one else whose article we discussed together - he said to you: "I will discuss the scientific content of Iyad's episodes," then he mentioned eight points. By Allah - my brothers - his responses hardly lack falsehood, lies, or ignorance, summarized in three things: attributing to me what I did not say, then attacking this imaginary statement, or what is known as the "straw man" fallacy. Mentioning shameful superstitions that mock the owners of these responses - unfortunately. Mentioning doubts that I have already responded to in detail in the episodes of "Journey of Certainty."
Let's move past the first point because the writer tells you: "It is true that 'Ad-Dahiyeh' made mistakes in information such as the design of the eye network being wrong, but he apologized." Of course - my brothers - 'Ad-Dahiyeh' publishes his false speech in front of millions on YouTube, then apologizes on his personal Facebook account, which is viewed by a very small percentage. Speech that criticizes creation, a ridiculous doubt from the known doubts of the atheists. You don't have to watch a video and correct the mistake! You don't have to remove the episode, correct it, and then return it. No, just an apology on your personal account. As our saying goes: "He hit me on the head and made it better under the stairs!" But let's move past this point; the writer admits that there are mistakes. Let me present to you some problems in the second point out of eight points; respecting my time and your time, our friend says to prove the "theory of evolution": "Even in our local area, we have in Egypt, by Allah, the Valley of the Whales in Fayoum, a fossil mine and evidence of evolution, for example, they found there whales with feet and other episodes." Of course - my brothers - I have explained - in detail and clearly - that the statement "whales with feet" is a ridiculous superstition that has been refuted for more than 130 years, and that these "bones for mating" are not feet. I explained this in the episode "The Truth of Sleep." So we say to the respected one: Wake up, my dear, go watch the episode so people don't laugh at you! And I hope you return to this episode.
Second example: Our friend from "Al-Arabi Al-Jadid" says: "Since 'Iyad' accuses Western scientists of forgery, it is not useful for him to say: Come, let's refer to institutional science and see what this paper says," and our friend objects to my reference to a paper in Nature; because Nature magazine is evolutionary, and its writer is an evolutionist - meaning he believes in the theory of evolution. Of course - my brothers - I responded to this doubt in the episode: "Rent Me Your Mind," and other episodes from "Journey of Certainty"; where I explained that we do not rent our minds to anyone, but we benefit from Western sciences and contribute to them, but we distinguish between real sciences and false sciences according to the evidence, and we explain how the implications of correct sciences are sometimes distorted in favor of false beliefs, this is our work throughout "Journey of Certainty." So our reference to research by adherents of the evolution myth strengthens our argument, in the manner of: "From your mouth, we condemn you," if a researcher publishes useful results and draws a false conclusion that serves his evolutionary belief, I am not obliged to take everything from him. If you, who blame us, want to rent your mind to them, you are free. As for us, we do not rent our minds to anyone.
Thirdly: Our friend in his scientific response asks: "Why does Al-Qanbi consider adherents of the theory of evolution to be against Islam in the first place? For many years, and there are publications and documentation written by Muslims (or written by Muslims) considering evolution as a tool of creation." First of all - brothers - I do not consider those who say: "Evolution is a tool of creation" to be against Islam; and I explained in detail in the episode: "Why does the theory of evolution conflict with Islam?" that our main problem is with the claim of "randomness and spontaneity," and I distinguished between them and those who say the possibility of the development of creatures by a Creator, and I discussed their saying in detail.
You are observing - my brothers - what is happening?! We are dealing with people who repeat - like a parrot - the same superstitions that we have responded to repeatedly, and they tell us what we did not say, and they raise doubts that have been responded to in detail. By Allah, if I remain in this state, I will spend my entire life reaffirming what has been affirmed and repeating what has been mentioned. All of this - meaning only the points - in the second point out of (8) points written by our friend, and by Allah, hardly a point or sentence is free from falsehood.
The same thing happened exactly with the second response, which its writer claimed was scientific, and the third response as well, and this is what I have reviewed so far, three responses claiming that they are scientific or discuss the content of my episodes, and we will put for you in the comments what shows that these responses are also - unfortunately - of the kind: "The important thing is to respond and that's it," Do you want a scientific response? I have given a scientific response!
In conclusion, by Allah, O you who forge to defend falsehood, your return to the right path is more beloved to us, and we present to you to stand with yourselves in a sincere stance that does not blind you with fanaticism, and to correct what you have corrupted, and we say to you: Come, let us cooperate with you in righteousness and piety, your nation needs you, it needs your energies and your sciences, and we remind you that Allah has condemned those who tried to deceive the Prophet and those who believed, saying: "And do not argue on behalf of those who betray themselves. Indeed, Allah does not like anyone who is a treacherous sinner. They hide from the people, but they do not hide from Allah, and He is with them when they [falsely] devise at night what He does not approve. And Allah is ever encompassing of what they do." [An-Nisa: 107-108] And Allah has deterred from defending them, saying: "Behold, it is you who have argued on their behalf in the worldly life. Then who will argue with Allah on their behalf on the Day of Resurrection, or who will be their advocate?" [An-Nisa: 109] After the Quran has explained the magnitude of the crime and deterred from defending their owners, it opened the door of repentance for them; it opened the door of repentance for them, saying: "And whoever does an evil or wrongs himself but then seeks forgiveness of Allah will find Allah Forgiving and Merciful." [An-Nisa: 110] We ask Allah to open their hearts to the truth.
And peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah and His blessings.